Adult development is becoming an important field of study for psychology and other disciplines. Little has been done, however, to conceptualize the nature of adult development and to define the major issues in this field. The author summarizes his own formulations of life course, life cycle, life structure, and the adult development of the life structure in early and middle adulthood. He then discusses six major issues that must be dealt with by every structural approach to adult development: What are the alternative ways of defining a structural stage or period? What relative emphasis is given to the structures as compared to the transitional periods? How can we make best use of the distinction between hierarchical levels and seasons of development? Are there age-linked developmental periods in adulthood? What are the relative merits and limitations of various research methods? How can we bring together the developmental perspective and the socialization perspective?

No abstract

AND PHYLLIS E, HUFFMAN, Western Reserve UmversttyTHE PROBLEM 1 HIS PAPER IS concerned with current ways of thinking, or ideologtcal orientatwns, regarding family structure and functioning These orientations can be labeled and grouped in many ways, none of which will do full justice to their individual distinctiveness In the present study they are placed along an autocratic-democratic continuum The autocratic extreme is represented by various forms of "traditional family ldeolc^jy"-^viewpoints which involve an hierarchical conception of familial relationships, emphasis on discipline in child-rearing, sharp dichotomization of sex roles, and the like The democratic orientations tend to decentralize authonty within the family, to seek greater equality m husband-wife and parent-child relationships, and to maximize individual self-determination The terms "democratic" and "autocratic" refer not to a simple dichotomy but to antipodes of a broad and internally complex continuum Moreover, there are important qualitative variations within each ideological camp and there are numerous "intermediate" positions The present study focuses only on certain gross differences between the two extreme positions and is therefore only a first step in the analysis of the total continuum This study has one technological and several theoretical aims The former involves the construction of a device-the Traditional Family Ideology (TFI) Scale-^for assessing an individual's position on the democratic-autocratic continuum The theoretical aims ln-'The initial research was earned out by the authors at Western Reserve University m 1949/1950 The present paper is a revision of an earlier report and contains additional data obtained at the Laboratory of Social Relations, Harvard University The study was facilitated by a grant from the Laboratory of Social Relations

For the past nine years my colleagues and I have been working on a theory of adult psychosocial development in men (Levinson et al., 1974, 1977; Levinson, 1977). We have started some research on women (Stewart, 1977), but it is too early yet to report definitive theory or findings. Our aim is to encompass the many components of a man's life-all of his relationships with individuals, groups, and institutions that have significance for him. The components of life include his occupation and its evolution over the years, his love relationships, marriage, and family life, his various other roles and careers in numerous social contexts. This psychosocial approach includes the man's personality and the ways in which it influences and is influenced by the evolution of his careers in occupation, family, and other systems. The resulting theory is not a theory of personality development, nor of occupational development, nor of development in any single aspect of living. It deals, rather, with the development of the individual life in the broadest sense, encompassing all of these segments. This theory provides a context within which we can study in more detail the development of personality and of particular careers. I shall briefly describe the developmental periods we discovered in early and middle adulthood, giving major emphasis to one period, the Mid-life Transition. Like childhood and adolescence, these periods are found in the lives of all men. Of ourse, men traverse them in myriad ways, as a result of differences in class, ethnicity, personality, and other factors. My primary aim is to present some of our major concepts, hypotheses, findings, and ways of thinking about adult development. None of them have been fully validated. Together, they comprise a framework for the analysis of adult development. No doubt the theory will be modified an extended as a result of further investigation.

This is a preliminary statement of a theory of psychosocial periods in the development of men from the end of adolescence to the middle 40s. The theory has emerged from a study of 40 men currently in the mid-life decade (age 35-45). The method was biographical: through a series of interviews we constructed the adult life course of each man and looked for a sequential order underlying the highly diverse, unique individual biographies. (a) The first period, Leaving the Family, is a bridge between adolescent life and full entry into the adult world. (b) Getting Into the Adult World extends from the early 20s until 27-29, its major developmental tasks are to build an initial life structure, to form an occupation, and to work on the ego stage of Intimacy vs. Aloneness. (c) This is followed by the Age Thirty Transition which lasts for some four to six years and provides an opportunity to modify or drastically change the provisional first structure. (d) Settling Down extends from the early 30s until age 39-41 Its tasks are to build a second and more stable early adult life structure and, in the late 30s, to "Become One's Own Man." (e) The Mid-Life Transition involves the termination of early adulthood and the initiation of middle adulthood, and is part of both Its tasks are to reappraise and modify the late 30s' life structure, to rediscover important but neglected parts of the self and. toward the end, to make choices that provide the basis for a new life structure. (f) The Mid-Life Transition ordinarily gives way in the mid-40s to a period of building and living within a first provisional life structure for middle adulthood. Though our study ends at this point, we assume that there is a further evolution, involving periods of transition and of relative stability, throughout the life cycle.