Patients with advanced incurable cancer face complex physical, psychological, social, and spiritual consequences of disease and its treatment. Care for these patients should include an individualized assessment of the patient's needs, goals, and preferences throughout the course of illness. Consideration of disease-directed therapy, symptom management, and attention to quality of life are important aspects of quality cancer care. However, emerging evidence suggests that, too often, realistic conversations about prognosis, the potential benefits and limitations of disease-directed therapy, and the potential role of palliative care, either in conjunction with or as an alternative to disease-directed therapy, occur late in the course of illness or not at all. This article addresses the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) vision for improved communication with and decision making for patients with advanced cancer. This statement advocates an individualized approach to discussing and providing disease-directed and supportive care options for patients with advanced cancer throughout the continuum of care. Building on ASCO's prior statements on end-of-life care (1998) and palliative care (2009), this article reviews the evidence for improved patient care in advanced cancer when patients' individual goals and preferences for care are discussed. It outlines the goals for individualized care, barriers that currently limit realization of this vision, and possible strategies to overcome these barriers that can improve care consistent with the goals of our patients and evidence-based medical practice.

No abstract

No abstract

A clinical trial was undertaken to improve the therapeutic index of cis-platinum diammine dichloride with a concomitantly administered mannitol induced diuresis. Sixty patients, heavily pretreated, were entered; fifty-one are evaluable. The technique of concomitant osmotic diuresis and CPDD administration is described in detail. Doses ranged from 3 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg. At 5 mg/kg, dose-limiting renal, marrow and ototoxicity were seen, and resulted in one drug death. Marrow toxicity was moderate. Renal toxicity was limited to transient elevations in serum creatinine levels, except in some patients who had renal impairment prior to CPDD treatment. These patients had moderate renal toxicity. Serial treatments as frequently as once every 3 weeks were used to maintain responses. Serial high dose CPDD produced only mild renal dysfunction. Ototoxicity, usually subclinical, was quantitated audiometrically, and found to be dose related, but not clinically prohibitive at 4 mg/kg or less. The overall response rate (PR/MR) was 42%. Clinically significant responses in epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck, adenocarcinoma of the ovary, and germ cell tumors of the testis were seen. All six responding patients with germ cell tumor of the testis, had been resistant to low dose (1mg/kg) CPDD. Two responding patients with ovarian adenocarcinoma had been resistant to alkylating agents.