Background:Sports-related groin injuries are common among athletes. However, traumatic proximal adductor avulsion injuries are relatively rare groin injuries in the athletic population, with limited case reports describing suture anchor repair.Purpose:To report on the outcomes of surgical reattachment of proximal adductor avulsion injuries in athletes utilizing a suture anchor repair technique.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Prospective data were collected on patients undergoing surgical reattachment of proximal adductor avulsion injuries from December 2012 to May 2015 by a single surgeon. Six athletes presented after a traumatic sports-related injury with disabling groin pain, adductor weakness, and magnetic resonance imaging confirmation of fibrocartilage avulsion of the proximal adductor with retraction. Patient-reported outcomes (Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living [HOS-ADL] and Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific [SS] subscales, modified Harris Hip Score [mHHS], and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain) were collected preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up.Results:The latest follow-up of each patient averaged 33.4 months postoperatively (range, 25-42.5 months). All patients returned to sporting activities, with 1 minor wound complication that resolved. Paired-samples t tests indicated that the mean latest postoperative scores for all patients were significantly better than their mean preoperative scores (HOS-ADL: 99.0 vs 43.2, HOS-SS: 98.9 vs 8.3, and mHHS: 97.1 vs 44.6, respectively; P < .001 for all). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in mean postoperative VAS scores for all patients (from 89.2 to 2.2; P < .001).Conclusion:Patient-reported outcomes offer an objective measure of hip function and pain control. Surgical reattachment utilizing a multiple suture anchor technique is a successful procedure that allows for a safe return to athletic performance and a predictable return to sport.

The quality of online pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials may affect communication with patients and their caregivers, and further investigation and modification of quality are needed.

Background: Avulsion injuries of the lesser trochanter apophysis are relatively uncommon injuries and there have been no peer-reviewed case series dedicated to the evaluation and treatment of this injury. The purpose of this study is to characterize avulsion injuries of the lesser trochanter apophysis, review treatment protocols, and time to return to sport.Methods: We reviewed 30 confirmed avulsion fractures of the lesser trochanter. Clinical data were reviewed to evaluate treatment protocols, duration, and time to return to sport. Radiographs were reviewed to confirm lesser trochanter avulsion and fracture displacement.Results: There were 26 males and 4 females, with the average age at the time of injury being 14.2 years. Treatment modalities consisted of protective weight-bearing, discontinuation of the patient's sport in all cases, and formal physical therapy in 18 cases. The average treatment duration was 30.7 days. The mean follow-up time was 102 days. The radiographic assessment demonstrated an average fracture displacement of 5.1 mm. The average return to sport was 11 weeks.Conclusion: This is the first large case series studying avulsion injuries of the lesser trochanter. We have shown that these athletes can be managed non-surgically and can successfully return back to sport within three months.

Background: Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia is controversial. Recently, there has been increased awareness of a prominent anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) resulting in subspinous impingement. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to report outcomes of arthroscopic subspinous decompression in patients with symptomatic hip impingement and borderline hip dysplasia compared with a matched cohort with nondysplastic FAI. Addressing a prominent subspinous region and cam/pincer lesion in the borderline dysplastic hip may lead to favorable outcomes comparable with those of patients undergoing arthroscopic management of nondysplastic FAI. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with symptomatic hip impingement, borderline dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA], 18°-24°), and prominent AIIS (BDSI group) whose nonoperative management failed and who subsequently underwent arthroscopic subspinous decompression were retrospectively identified. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging was used to categorize AIIS morphology into type 1, 2, or 3 (Hetsroni classification). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores consisting of the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) were obtained preoperatively and at an average of 44 months postoperatively (range, 23-61 months). Exclusion criteria were Tönnis osteoarthritis grade >1 and a history of previous hip procedures. An age-, sex-, and body mass index–matched cohort of patients without dysplasia (LCEA, >25°) who underwent arthroscopic FAI surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up were selected to serve as the control group. Results: Eighteen patients, 19 hips (14 women and 4 men; average age, 28 years) were included. Of the 19 hips in the BDSI group, the average LCEA and alpha angle were 21.8° and 66.2°, respectively; 14 hips were Hestroni type 2, and 5 hips were type 1. There were no postoperative complications or additional procedures performed since the last follow-up. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant improvement in all PRO scores from preoperatively to the last follow-up: mHHS, 64.7 to 87.7 ( P < .001); HOS-ADL, 62.1 to 92.1 ( P < .001); HOS-SSS, 26.5 to 87.1 ( P < .001). An analysis of covariance revealed that patients with type 2 AIIS had a significantly higher postoperative mHHS than those with a type 1 morphology (88.3 and 95.6, respectively; P < .01) The BDSI group had a significantly lower preoperative HOS-SSS (26.5; P < .001) in comparison with the control group. However, there was no significant difference in postoperative outcome scores between groups. The BDSI group underwent significantly more microfracture, capsular plication, and ligamentum teres debridement (15.8%; P = .04). Conclusion: Arthroscopic AIIS decompression in patients with coexisting borderline dysplasia and subspinous impingement is a safe and effective method of treatment that produces outcomes comparable with those of a cohort with nondysplastic FAI.

Object The Internet has become a widespread source for disseminating health information to large numbers of people. Such is the case for spine surgery as well. Given the complexity of spinal surgeries, an important point to consider is whether these resources are easily read and understood by most Americans. The average national reading grade level has been estimated to be at about the 7th grade. In the present study the authors strove to assess the readability of open spine surgery resources and minimally invasive spine surgery resources to offer suggestions to help improve the readability of patient resources. Methods Online patient education resources were downloaded in 2013 from 50 resources representing either traditional open back surgery or minimally invasive spine surgery. Each resource was assessed using 10 scales from Readability Studio Professional Edition version 2012.1. Results Patient education resources representing traditional open back surgery or minimally invasive spine surgery were all found to be written at a level well above the recommended 6th grade level. In general, minimally invasive spine surgery materials were written at a higher grade level. Conclusions The readability of patient education resources from spine surgery websites exceeds the average reading ability of an American adult. Revisions may be warranted to increase quality and patient comprehension of these resources to effectively reach a greater patient population.