Arthroscopic Management of Subspinous Impingement in Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Outcomes Compared With a Matched Cohort With Nondysplastic Femoroacetabular Impingement

Feghhi, Daniel; Shearin, Jonathan; Bharam, Srino

doi:10.1177/0363546520951202

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many authors have noted excellent short- to midterm results after hip arthroscopy in these patients. 1,2,4-10,16-18,26,34 Patient selection is important, as multiple risk factors for poorer outcomes have been cited. These include increasing age, 13,14,17 hip osteoarthritis, 13,22,29 ligamentum teres tears, 23 untreated FAI, 5 labral debridement, 15 a smaller vertical-center-anterior angle, 13 and cartilage injury.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ten-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The role of hip arthroscopy in the treatment of patients with borderline hip dysplasia is controversial and evolving. Purpose: To evaluate outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in a hip with borderline dysplasia. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All hips that underwent labral repair between June 2006 and March 2009 for femoroacetabular impingement with borderline dysplasia were included if they had a lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25°, had primary hip arthroscopy for the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement, and were aged 18 to 70 years. Patients were excluded if they had previous hip surgery, avascular necrosis, or fracture. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was performed, with survivorship defined as avoidance of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Results: A total of 45 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 38 were contacted at a minimum 10 years postoperatively (84%; mean ± SD, 12 ± 1.3 years). There were 23 women and 15 men with an average age of 41 ± 9.6 years (range, 25-69). Twenty patients were ≥40 years of age. In this patient cohort, survivorship was 87% at 5 years and 79% at 10 years for conversion to THA. Of the 38 patients included, 9 were converted to THA (24%), and 3 required revision hip arthroscopy (7%). Patient age, Tönnis grade, microfracture of cartilage lesions, and Tönnis angle >15° were associated with conversion to THA. No statistically significant differences were found between those who underwent conversion to THA and those who did not regarding lateral center-edge angle, Sharp angle, or alpha angle. Significant improvements were seen at follow-up of 12 years (range, 10-13) for the modified Harris Hip Score (58 to 83; P = .002), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (70 to 87; P = .003), Hip Outcome Score–Sport (47 to 76; P = .004), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (31 to 10; P = .001). At follow-up, >80% maintained the minimal clinically important difference for the Hip Outcome Score (Activities of Daily Living and Sport) with no differences between patients aged <40 and ≥40 years. Conclusion: Risk factors for conversion to THA after hip arthroscopy in the borderline dysplastic hip included older age, higher Tönnis grades, grade 4 chondral lesions that were microfractures, and Tönnis angle >15°. In those patients who did not convert to THA, improvement in outcome measures was seen at 10 years. Careful patient selection is critical to the success of this procedure.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ten-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of the present study in athletes echo those of previous studies in the general population. Feghhi et al 17 evaluated outcomes of arthroscopic subspine decompression in patients with symptomatic hip impingement and borderline dysplasia as compared with a matched cohort with nondysplastic FAIS. In their study, patients with borderline dysplasia and SSI demonstrated significantly more intra-articular damage and underwent more microfracture, capsular plication, and ligamentum teres debridement than the control group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimum 2-Year Outcomes and Return to Sports of Competitive Athletes Who Undergo Subspine Decompression During Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Subspine Impingement: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and return to sports (RTS) have not been established in athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy and subspine decompression for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and subspine impingement (SSI). Purpose: (1) To report minimum 2-year PROs and RTS in competitive athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAIS with subspine decompression for treatment of SSI and (2) to compare clinical results with a matched control group of athletes without SSI. Study Design: Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were reviewed for professional, collegiate, and high school athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with arthroscopic subspine decompression for SSI between February 2011 and October 2018. Inclusion criteria included preoperative and minimum 2-year follow-up scores for the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale for pain. Rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also calculated. For comparison, athletes in the SSI group were propensity matched according to age at the time of surgery, sex, body mass index, lateral center-edge angle, alpha angle, sport level, acetabular labrum articular disruption grade, and sport type to a control group of athletes without SSI. Results: A total of 30 SSI athletes were included in the study, with a mean plus or minus standard deviation follow-up of 32.1 ± 7.1 months and age of 20.9 ± 5.7 years. The SSI cohort demonstrated significant improvement in all recorded PROs ( P < .001), returned to sports at high rates (88.5%), and achieved the MCID for the Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific Subscale at a high rate (80.0%). Furthermore, these patients had a low rate of undergoing revision surgery (6.7%). When compared with a propensity-matched control group of 59 athletes, the SSI group demonstrated similar rates of RTS, revision, and achieving the MCID for all PROs. Conclusion: Competitive athletes with FAIS and SSI who underwent primary hip arthroscopy and subspine decompression had favorable outcomes and high RTS rates at minimum 2-year follow-up. These results were comparable with those of a control group of athletes without SSI undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.

show abstract

“…A recent study that compared AIIS impingement with borderline hip dysplasia and nondysplastic FAIS revealed that arthroscopic AIIS decompression is a safe and effective treatment. 10 A clinical issue is the decision regarding the area of decompression within the AIIS lesion. In this regard, an important cadaveric study was conducted by Hapa et al 14 They showed that the direct head of the rectus tendon has a broad insertion on the AIIS; however, the area devoid of tendon provides a “safe zone” for subspine decompression in cases of symptomatic AIIS impingement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Imaging Diagnosis, Prevalence, and Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kobayashi

Kamono

Yamamoto

et al. 2022

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Subspine impingement, or anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) impingement, is a type of extra-articular pathology associated with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and often requires subsequent arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To examine the diagnostic accuracy, prevalence, and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for AIIS impingement. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist was applied. We searched for studies on the prevalence, diagnostic accuracy, and results of surgical treatment for AIIS impingement. For each included study, data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed to identify pooled prevalence, calculate clinical outcome scores, and estimate adverse events. The QUADAS (a quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies) was used to assess the quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies, and the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies was used to assess the quality of the studies on arthroscopic treatment efficacy. Results: Out of an initial 791 studies, 23 were included. AIIS impingement was diagnosed by plain radiography with 76% to 86% sensitivity, 3-dimensional computed tomography with 80% to 81.8% sensitivity, magnetic resonance imaging with 80% sensitivity, and ultrasound with 92.5% sensitivity. For patients who underwent hip arthroscopy, the pooled prevalence of AIIS impingement was 18%. Significant improvement between pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes was observed: 25.75 points for the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), 46.88 points for the Hip Outcome Score–Sport subscale, 20.85 points for the Nonarthritic Hip Score, and -2.92 points for the pain visual analog scale. The minimal clinically important difference on the mHHS was exceeded by 94% of patients. The pooled incidence of surgical complications was 1%. Of 6 included studies on diagnostic accuracy, 2 were identified as having a low risk of bias, and 4 included >2 factors with a high risk of bias. All 9 included studies on treatment outcomes had at least 1 factor with a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Several imaging modalities assist in the diagnosis of AIIS impingement. The overall prevalence of AIIS impingement in patients that underwent hip arthroscopy was 18%. Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic AIIS decompression were generally favorable, with a relatively low rate of surgical complications.

show abstract

Arthroscopic Management of Subspinous Impingement in Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Outcomes Compared With a Matched Cohort With Nondysplastic Femoroacetabular Impingement

Cited by 9 publications

References 35 publications

Ten-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia

Ten-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia

Minimum 2-Year Outcomes and Return to Sports of Competitive Athletes Who Undergo Subspine Decompression During Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Subspine Impingement: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Study

Imaging Diagnosis, Prevalence, and Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About