This study evaluated bone regeneration and osseointegration of hydroxyapatite (HA) coated and titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) implants placed in sockets immediately after extraction in 36 adults, mean age 55.2 years (range 26 to 81 years). Twelve TPS and 10 HA‐coated implants in 20 patients were grafted with demineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft (DFDBA), covered with a barrier material, and the facial flap coronally positioned to attain primary closure (experimental). The remaining 11 TPS and 10 HAcoated implants were placed similarly, except that no DFDBA was used (control). Osseous structures were measured at the initial placement and 6‐month re‐entry surgeries. At the 6‐month re‐entry, all implants placed were clinically osseointegrated. Bone resorption at the most coronal socket crest was −1.53 mm for the grafted group and −1.59 mm for the control group. Crestal bone apposition of 1.39 mm was noted at the most apical socket crest (ASC) for the grafted group, whereas crestal resorption of −0.11 mm was noted in the ungrafted control group (P < 0.02). Bone fill from the base of the deepest osseous defect was 5.68 mm for the grafted group and 3.18 mm for the control group (P < 0.04). Complete resolution of osseous defects occurred at 15 of 22 sites in the grafted group and at 9 of 21 sites in the control group. Clinical exposure of the barrier material and a subsequent inflammatory response at 27 of 43 sites, required removal of the material prior to the 6‐month re‐entry and was associated with significantly more bone loss at the ASC sites (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference for any of the parameters when comparing the TPS with the HA‐coated implants. J Periodontol 1994;65:881–891.
The non-inferiority of the peer outcomes and the mentioned improvements in this group suggest that volunteer trained peer educators and ongoing support can be successful. This approach provides an effective alternative method of education, especially in areas with limited availability of professionals and economic resources.
Dental implants placed in irradiated bone have a greater risk for failure. Survival is significantly influenced by the location of the implant (maxilla or mandible, anterior or posterior).
Systemic BMD and osteoporotic status are not associated with local jawbone quality. Implants placed in good-quality bone, as assessed subjectively by the surgeon at the time of implant placement, have significantly better survival characteristics than implants placed in moderate-/poor-quality bone.
There was no significant difference in survival when implants were placed in native or grafted bone in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. For implants placed in native bone, survival was significantly influenced by the location of the implant (maxilla or mandible, anterior or posterior).
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a structured teaching/treatment programme on the clinical and metabolic control of non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetic patients. The programme was aimed at improving the overall treatment quality in these patients through measures involving self-care, diet, exercise and weight reduction. Four theoretical-practical teaching units were given once a week to group of 5-8 ambulatory patients by previously trained general practitioners. Clinical and biochemical parameters were recorded at the beginning of the course and 1 year after its completion in 40 patients attending the programme and in 39 patients of similar clinical characteristics under conventional diabetes treatment, but receiving no structured teaching before or during the survey period (control group). The drop-out percentage in the intervention group (25%) was significantly lower than in the control group (45%, P < 0.05), suggesting an incentive toward greater compliance in the former. At the end of the 1-year follow-up, the mean differences observed in the control and in the intervention groups were: body weight loss -2.4 +/- 0.5 kg vs -0.4 +/- 0.5 (P < 0.001); haemoglobin HbA1 -0.2% +/- 0.4% vs +0.8% +/- 0.4% (NS); number of daily oral hypoglycaemic agent intake -1.4 +/- 0.2 vs +0.9 +/- 0.2 tablets (P < 0.001). Our results strongly suggest that this programme, applied through family doctors, may constitute an efficient tool to improve the compliance and clinico-metabolic control of type 2 patients at the primary health care level.
The purpose of the study was to compare clinical parameter changes and osseous regeneration in 12 pairs of comparable Class II mandibular molar furcation invasion defects using either a bioabsorbable demineralized laminar bone allograft membrane or a non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane as a barrier in guided tissue regeneration. Measurements with calibrated periodontal probes were made to determine soft tissue recession, probing depth, and attachment levels. Defects within each pair were randomly selected for treatment with either bioabsorbable demineralized bone allograft membrane or ePTFE membrane. All defects were concurrently grafted with particulate demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). Additional measurements were made at surgery to determine crestal resorption and the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the osseous defects. The temporal course and extent of membrane exposures were also recorded. The non-resorbable membrane was retrieved 6 weeks following placement. Six months following initial surgical treatment, each site was surgically re-entered and all soft and hard tissue measurements repeated. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that both treatments resulted in significant within-group mean vertical and horizontal osseous fill, but no statistical difference emerged between the groups. As based on this pilot study, laminar bone membrane may be as effective as ePTFE when used in conjunction with DFDBA for treatment of Class II mandibular molar furcation bone defects. This pilot study of low power suggests that these two materials may be equivalent when used in conjunction with DFDBA. Further studies of much higher power and of the laminar bone alone as compared to positive and negative controls are required. Laminar bone does not require a secondary surgical procedure for removal and may undergo less frequent instances and degrees of exposure during healing.
The purposes of this study were two‐fold: to compare the DNA probe and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) microbial identification tests and correlate the levels of microorganisms with adult periodontitis. A single plaque sample was taken from each of 2 sites in 52 patients. Twelve of these patients were also sampled during and after treatment. The experimental site had clinical indicators of disease (bleeding on probing, probing and attachment loss of ≥ 6 mm) and the contralateral site (control) was clinically healthy. A total of 176 plaque samples were collected, divided, processed, and sent for both types of quantitative microbial analyses. All of these samples were used to compare the DNA probe and ELISA methods while only the initial 104 pretreatment sites were used to correlate microorganisms/method with clinical indicators of adult periodontitis. DNA probes were used to assay for A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, E. corrodens, F. nucleatum, T. denticola, and C. rectus. An ELISA utilizing monoclonal antibodies was used to assay for P. gingivalis, E. corrodens, T. denticola, and C. rectus. Comparison of the two methods revealed that the ELISA test identified P. gingivalis and C. rectus significantly more often than the DNA probe method and that T. denticola was detected more frequently with the DNA probe. The sensitivities and specificities varied widely among organisms and by test. P. gingivalis, as identified by ELISA, had the highest degree of sensitivity and specificity (0.90 and 0.82 respectively) to clinical indicators of adult periodontitis. J Periodontol 1994;65:576–582.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.