Adults with type 2 diabetes using WellDoc's software achieved statistically significant improvements in A1c. HCP and patient satisfaction with the system was clinically and statistically significant.

No abstract

This study compares the effects of a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) on in vivo insulin sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension. Forty-six patients with mild and moderate hypertension were studied. After a 2-week single-blind placebo phase, they were randomly assigned to double-blind therapy with either amlodipine (2.5 to 10 mg/day) or enalapril (5 to 40 mg/day) for 16 weeks. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, degree of obesity, metabolic parameters, and arterial blood pressure. Insulin sensitivity was measured at baseline and at week 16 during the active phase using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps. Arterial blood pressure decreased similarly in both groups. Whole body glucose uptake (M-value) increased with amlodipine from 3.63 +/- 0.32 (mean +/- SEM) to 3.97 +/- 0.31 mg/kg/min (P = .02). A similar tendency was observed with enalapril: from 3.59 +/- 0.32 to 3.94 +/- 0.30 mg/kg/min (P = .09). A trend to lower steady-state insulin level during the second clamp (compared to baseline) was observed in both groups. The clamp-derived insulin sensitivity index (that corrects for steady-state insulin levels and glucose levels during the clamp) increased similarly in both groups: from 1.15 +/- 0.11 to 1.39 +/- 0.13 with amlodipine (P = .03) and from 1.25 +/- 0.13 to 1.49 +/- 0.16 with enalapril (P = .01). LDL cholesterol decreased with amlodipine (mean change, -11.3 mg/dL, P = .004). Amlodipine and enalapril were associated with increments in insulin sensitivity. Amlodipine provided an additional benefit with decreased low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Essential hypertension is associated with multiple metabolic abnormalities, among them, hyperinsulinemia. This hyperinsulinemia is attributed to the presence of decreased insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance) with consequent compensatory insulin secretion. We tested the hypothesis that decreased insulin clearance is present in hypertensive subjects and contributes to hyperinsulinemia independently of the degree of insulin resistance. Seventy-five subjects were studied (48 hypertensive and 27 normotensive). Both groups were comparable in terms of age, body fat content, waist-to-hip ratio, and sex distribution. A primed continuous insulin infusion at 40 mU/m2 per minute was performed. Glucose was maintained at baseline levels with the euglycemic clamp technique. Hypertensive subjects were characterized by decreased insulin sensitivity (insulin-mediated glucose uptake: 5.14 +/- 0.28 versus 7.26 +/- 0.61 mg glucose/kg fat-free mass per minute, hypertensive versus normotensive, P = .002), increased insulin levels during the insulin infusions (804 +/- 36 versus 510 +/- 38 pmol/L, hypertensive versus normotensive, P < .001), and decreased insulin metabolic clearance rate (328 +/- 15 versus 521 +/- 30 mL/min per meter squared, hypertensive versus normotensive, P < .001). In an ANCOVA (including sex, degree of obesity, waist-to-hip ratio, and insulin sensitivity as covariates) the differences in insulin metabolic clearance rate between normotensive and hypertensive subjects remained highly significant (P < .001). Insulin metabolic clearance rate was significantly associated with fasting insulin levels. We conclude that essential hypertension is independently associated with decreased insulin metabolic clearance rate in addition to insulin resistance. A low insulin metabolic clearance rate may be a contributory factor to the hyperinsulinemia observed in essential hypertension.

Patient participation in decision-making is associated with better understanding of care. Participation in decision-making plays a key role in patient understanding of diabetes self-management and subsequent self-care practices. Patients with limited education need specific instruction in foot care, food choices, and monitoring hemoglobin A1c.

The metabolic syndrome is a public health concern because its prevalence is increasing in the United States, and it is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We discuss epidemiologic trends in and causes of the metabolic syndrome. The relationships among the cardiometabolic risk factors that contribute to the metabolic syndrome-obesity, insulin resistance, proinflammatory and prothrombotic states, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hypertension-and between these risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are explained. Currently available interventions to modify these risk factors and the importance of preventive strategies and early detection efforts are also addressed.

The adrenergic response to high physiological hyperinsulinemia was studied in 39 hypertensive subjects (28 men and 11 women) and 25 normal volunteers (15 men and 10 women), using the euglycemic clamp technique. Control studies using 0.45% saline infusions (sham studies) were also performed. Before and during the clamp procedure, plasma norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) were measured using a high performance liquid chromatographic method (HPLC). The association between the increment in NE and E levels and insulin sensitivity, steady-state insulin level during the clamps, waist to hip ratio (WHR), baseline NE levels and gender was studied. NE levels increased during the hyperinsulinemic period (mean increase 46 +/- 6 pmol P < .001 upsilon baseline and P < .01 upsilon sham studies). E levels did not differ between the insulin clamps and the sham studies. Insulin sensitivity was not significantly associated with the increment in NE. Hypertensive subjects had a higher NE increase than the normotensive individuals (55 +/- 7 upsilon 30 +/- 10 pmol, P = .03), but also had higher insulin levels during the clamps (839 +/- 43 upsilon 522 +/- 38 pmol, P < .001). Insulin levels accounted for most of the differences in NE increase between the normotensive and hypertensive groups. Gender, adiposity and WHR were also associated with NE increment. We conclude that the insulin mediated sympathetic activation is not affected in the presence of decreased insulin sensitivity for glucose utilization. The greater degree of sympathetic activation observed in hypertensive subjects is a function of the level of insulinemia obtained during the clamps.

The use of the heating device upon administration of short-acting insulin analogues in pump-treated type 1 diabetic patients was found to enhance insulin absorption. This heating device may therefore serve to achieve better meal insulin coverage.