Receptors for prostanoids on platelets include the EP3 receptor for which the natural agonist is the inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) produced in atherosclerotic plaques. EP3 is implicated in atherothrombosis and an EP3 antagonist might provide atherosclerotic lesion-specific antithrombotic therapy. DG-041 (2,3-dichlorothiophene-5-sulfonic acid, 3-[1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-5-fluoro-3-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl]acryloylamide) is a direct-acting EP3 antagonist currently being evaluated in Phase 2 clinical trials. We have examined the contributions of EP3 to platelet function using the selective EP3 agonist sulprostone and also PGE(2), and determined the effects of DG-041 on these. Studies were in human platelet-rich plasma or whole blood and included aggregometry and flow cytometry. Sulprostone enhanced aggregation induced by primary agonists including collagen, TRAP, platelet activating factor, U46619, serotonin and adenosine diphosphate, and enhanced P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation. It inhibited adenylate cyclase (measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation) and enhanced Ca(2+) mobilization. It potentiated platelet function even in the presence of aspirin and/or AR-C69931 (a P2Y(12) antagonist). DG-041 antagonized the effects of sulprostone on platelet function. The effect of PGE(2) on platelet aggregation depended on the nature of the agonist and the concentration of PGE(2) used as a consequence of both pro-aggregatory effects via EP3 and anti-aggregatory effects via other receptors. DG-041 potentiated the protective effects of PGE(2) on platelet aggregation by inhibiting the pro-aggregatory effect via EP3 stimulation. DG-041 remained effective in the presence of a P2Y(12) antagonist and aspirin. DG-041 warrants continued investigation as a potential agent for the treatment of atherothrombosis without inducing unwanted bleeding risk.

BackgroundThe United Nations Millennium Development Goals galvanized global efforts to alleviate suffering of the world’s poorest people through unprecedented public-private partnerships. Donor aid agencies have demonstrably saved millions of lives that might otherwise have been lost to disease through increased access to quality-assured vaccines and medicines. Yet, the introduction of these health interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) continues to face a time lag due to factors which remain poorly understood.Methods and FindingsA recurring theme from our partnership engagements was that an optimized regulatory process would contribute to improved access to quality health products. Therefore, we investigated the current system for medicine and vaccine registration in LMICs as part of our comprehensive regulatory strategy. Here, we report a fact base of the registration timelines for vaccines and drugs used to treat certain communicable diseases in LMICs. We worked with a broad set of stakeholders, including the World Health Organization’s prequalification team, national regulatory authorities, manufacturers, procurers, and other experts, and collected data on the timelines between first submission and last approval of applications for product registration sub-Saharan Africa. We focused on countries with the highest burden of communicable disease and the greatest need for the products studied. The data showed a typical lag of 4 to 7 years between the first regulatory submission which was usually to a regulatory agency in a high-income country, and the final approval in Sub-Saharan Africa. Two of the three typical registration steps which products undergo before delivery in the countries involve lengthy timelines. Failure to leverage or rely on the findings from reviews already performed by competent regulatory authorities, disparate requirements for product approval by the countries, and lengthy timelines by manufacturers to respond to regulatory queries were key underlying factors for the delays.ConclusionsWe propose a series of measures which we developed in close collaboration with key stakeholders that could be taken to reduce registration time and to make safe, effective medicines more quickly available in countries where they are most needed. Many of these recommendations are being implemented by the responsible stakeholders, including the WHO prequalification team and the national regulatory authorities in Sub-Saharan Africa. Those efforts will be the focus of subsequent publications by the pertinent groups.

Poor adherence to medicines in clinical trials can undermine the value of the trials; for example, by compromising estimates of the benefits and risks of a medicine. In this article, we highlight such consequences and also discuss approaches to tackle this problem.

• Access to essential medicines is a key pillar of any health system seeking to deliver universal health coverage. Science-based, independent regulation of medical products is a critical part of ensuring that only quality essential medicines reach the patients who need them.

EP3 receptor antagonists may provide a new approach to the treatment of atherothrombotic disease by blocking the ability of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) to promote platelet function acting via EP3 receptors. DG-041 is an EP3 antagonist in the early stage of clinical development. Here, we quantitated effects on platelet function of DG-041 in-vitro and ex-vivo after administration to man when given alone and concomitantly with clopidogrel or clopidogrel and aspirin. With its unique mechanism of action, it was anticipated that DG-041 would potentiate inhibition of platelet function when given in combination with clopidogrel without materially increasing bleeding time. Initially, in-vitro studies were performed to determine inhibitory effects of DG-041 (3 µM) used alone or in combination with the P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor (1 µM), both without and with aspirin (100 µM). Platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression were measured in whole blood (n = 10) following stimulation with the thromboxane A2 (TXA2) mimetic U46619 (0.3 or 1 µM) in combination with either the EP3 agonist sulprostone (0.1 µM), or PGE2 (1 µM). DG-041 alone partially inhibited platelet function in-vitro, as did cangrelor. Addition of both DG-041 and cangrelor in combination provided significantly greater inhibition. An ex-vivo study was then performed using the same experimental approaches. This clinical study was a prospective, randomised, blinded (for DG-041/matching placebo), blocked, crossover study designed to compare the effects of DG-041, clopidogrel, or the combination of DG-041 with either clopidogrel or clopidogrel and aspirin. Healthy volunteers (n = 42) were randomly assigned to receive no background treatment, clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose plus 75 mg daily) or clopidogrel and aspirin (75 mg daily) for 10 days alongside DG-041 (200 mg twice daily) or placebo for 5 days, crossed over to placebo or DG-041 for the next 5 days. Platelet effects and bleeding time were measured at baseline, days 5 and 10. DG-041 partially inhibited platelet function ex-vivo, as did clopidogrel, while administration of both DG-041 and clopidogrel provided significantly greater inhibition. Administration of DG-041 alone did not increase bleeding time, and did not significantly affect the increased bleeding time seen with clopidogrel or clopidogrel with aspirin. Using these experimental approaches, the antiplatelet effects of DG-041 and a P2Y12 antagonist used alone and in combination can be determined both in-vitro and ex-vivo. Results show inhibitory effects of DG-041 on platelet function acting via EP3 receptor blockade, confirmed to be additional to those brought about by P2Y12 blockade. In both in-vitro and ex-vivo studies, aspirin neither promoted nor negated the effects of the other drugs.