Receptors for prostanoids on platelets include the EP3 receptor for which the natural agonist is the inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) produced in atherosclerotic plaques. EP3 is implicated in atherothrombosis and an EP3 antagonist might provide atherosclerotic lesion-specific antithrombotic therapy. DG-041 (2,3-dichlorothiophene-5-sulfonic acid, 3-[1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-5-fluoro-3-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl]acryloylamide) is a direct-acting EP3 antagonist currently being evaluated in Phase 2 clinical trials. We have examined the contributions of EP3 to platelet function using the selective EP3 agonist sulprostone and also PGE(2), and determined the effects of DG-041 on these. Studies were in human platelet-rich plasma or whole blood and included aggregometry and flow cytometry. Sulprostone enhanced aggregation induced by primary agonists including collagen, TRAP, platelet activating factor, U46619, serotonin and adenosine diphosphate, and enhanced P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation. It inhibited adenylate cyclase (measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation) and enhanced Ca(2+) mobilization. It potentiated platelet function even in the presence of aspirin and/or AR-C69931 (a P2Y(12) antagonist). DG-041 antagonized the effects of sulprostone on platelet function. The effect of PGE(2) on platelet aggregation depended on the nature of the agonist and the concentration of PGE(2) used as a consequence of both pro-aggregatory effects via EP3 and anti-aggregatory effects via other receptors. DG-041 potentiated the protective effects of PGE(2) on platelet aggregation by inhibiting the pro-aggregatory effect via EP3 stimulation. DG-041 remained effective in the presence of a P2Y(12) antagonist and aspirin. DG-041 warrants continued investigation as a potential agent for the treatment of atherothrombosis without inducing unwanted bleeding risk.
The effects of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) on platelet function are believed to be the result of opposing mechanisms that lead to both enhancement and inhibition of platelet function. Enhancement of platelet function is known to be via EP3 receptors linked to G(i) and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. However, the receptors involved in inhibition of platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation, calcium signaling and P-selectin expression to assess platelet function induced by platelet activating factor (PAF), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP-6) and the thromboxane A(2) mimetic U46619 respectively, to determine the effects of PGE(2) and of selective prostanoid receptor agonists on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation were also determined. We also assessed the ability of selective prostanoid receptor antagonists to modify the effects of PGE(2). The agonists and antagonists used were iloprost (IP agonist), ONO-DI-004 (EP1 agonist), ONO-AE1-259 (EP2 agonist), sulprostone (EP3 agonist), ONO-AE1-329 (EP4 agonist), CAY10441 (IP antagonist), ONO-8713 (EP1 antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist). Using the agonists available to us we demonstrated that EP3, EP4 and IP receptors elicit functional responses in platelets. The EP3 receptor agonist promoted platelet aggregation, calcium signaling and P-selectin expression and this was associated with a reduction in VASP phosphorylation. Conversely agonists acting at IP and EP4 receptors inhibited platelet function and this was associated with an increase in VASP phosphorylation. The effects on platelet function and VASP phosphorylation of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists used in conjunction with PGE(2) were consistent with PGE(2) interacting with EP3 receptors to enhance platelet function and with EP4 receptors (but not IP receptors) to inhibit platelet function. This is the first demonstration of the involvement of EP4 receptors in platelet responses to PGE(2).
Platelet and vascular stimulation leads to release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are known to influence vascular reactivity and thrombosis. Dipyridamole is a vasodilator and platelet inhibitor that has previously been shown to have direct antioxidant properties. The antioxidant effects of dipyridamole on vascular cell-derived ROS are not known; therefore, dipyridamole was incubated with endothelial cells and platelets and cellular redox status and release of endogenous ROS were assessed. Dipyridamole decreased intracellular basal ROS generation from endothelial cells as measured by DCFDA (2Ј,7Ј-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate) oxidation. Incubation of endothelial cells with dipyridamole also attenuated t-butylhydroperoxide-induced oxidative stress. Using a redox-sensitive fluorescent dye, dipyridamole improved cellular activity after treatment with t-butylhydroperoxide. Incubation with dipyridamole did not alter platelet release of nitric oxide or hydrogen peroxide but significantly attenuated superoxide release. Using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, dipyridamole decreased platelet ROS generation. Dipyridamole also suppressed platelet-soluble CD40 ligand release. In summary, at therapeutically relevant concentrations, dipyridamole suppresses the formation of ROS in platelets and endothelial cells and improves cellular redox status. These data suggest that the redox-dependent properties of dipyridamole have a direct effect on vascular cells.
Essentials Nitric oxide synthesis controls protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) function. Nitric oxide (NO) modulation of PDI controls endothelial thrombogenicity. S-nitrosylated PDI inhibits platelet function and thrombosis. Nitric oxide maintains vascular quiescence in part through inhibition of PDI. SUMMARY: Background Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) plays an essential role in thrombus formation, and PDI inhibition is being evaluated clinically as a novel anticoagulant strategy. However, little is known about the regulation of PDI in the vasculature. Thiols within the catalytic motif of PDI are essential for its role in thrombosis. These same thiols bind nitric oxide (NO), which is a potent regulator of vessel function. To determine whether regulation of PDI represents a mechanism by which NO controls vascular quiescence, we evaluated the effect of NO on PDI function in endothelial cells and platelets, and thrombus formation in vivo. Aim To assess the effect of S-nitrosylation on the regulation of PDI and other thiol isomerases in the vasculature. Methods and results The role of endogenous NO in PDI activity was evaluated by incubating endothelium with an NO scavenger, which resulted in exposure of free thiols, increased thiol isomerase activity, and enhanced thrombin generation on the cell membrane. Conversely, exposure of endothelium to NO carriers or elevation of endogenous NO levels by induction of NO synthesis resulted in S-nitrosylation of PDI and decreased surface thiol reductase activity. S-nitrosylation of platelet PDI inhibited its reductase activity, and S-nitrosylated PDI interfered with platelet aggregation, α-granule release, and thrombin generation on platelets. S-nitrosylated PDI also blocked laser-induced thrombus formation when infused into mice. S-nitrosylated ERp5 and ERp57 were found to have similar inhibitory activity. Conclusions These studies identify NO as a critical regulator of vascular PDI, and show that regulation of PDI function is an important mechanism by which NO maintains vascular quiescence.
In the present study, we have analysed the mechanisms of Ca(2+) entry and release in platelets obtained from BDL (bile-duct-ligated) rats, 11-13 days and 4 weeks after surgery. Platelets were washed and loaded with fura-2, and [Ca(2+)](i) (cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration) was determined in cell suspensions by means of fluorescence spectroscopy. Basal [Ca(2+)](i) was similar in platelets from BDL rats compared with those from their respective controls, both in the absence and presence of extracellular Ca(2+). Platelet stimulation with thrombin in the absence and presence of extracellular Ca(2+) induced a rapid rise in [Ca(2+)](i) that was of greater magnitude in platelets from BDL rats than in controls. Ca(2+) storage was significantly elevated in platelets from BDL rats, as well as the activity of SERCA (sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic-reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase). Capacitative Ca(2+) entry, as evaluated by inhibition of SERCA with thapsigargin, was also altered in platelets from BDL rats, having lower rates of Ca(2+) entry. In conclusion, chronic BDL alters intracellular Ca(2+) homoeostasis in platelets, such that an enhanced Ca(2+) release is evoked by thrombin, which may be due to an increased amount of Ca(2+) stored in the intracellular organelles and secondary to an enhanced activity of SERCA. These alterations are already evident before cirrhosis has completely developed and occurs during the cholestasis phase.
Objective-To investigate whether adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-derived adenosine might inhibit platelet aggregation, especially in the presence of a P2Y 12 antagonist, where the effects of ADP at the P2Y 12 receptor would be prevented. Methods and Results-Platelet aggregation was measured in response to thrombin receptor activator peptide by platelet counting in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood in the presence of ADP and the P2Y 12 antagonists cangrelor, prasugrel active metabolite, and ticagrelor. In the presence of a P2Y 12 antagonist, preincubation of PRP with ADP inhibited aggregation; this effect was abolished by adenosine deaminase. No inhibition of aggregation occurred in whole blood except when dipyridamole was added to inhibit adenosine uptake into erythrocytes. The effects of ADP in PRP and whole blood were replicated using adenosine and were directly related to changes in cAMP (assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation). All results were the same irrespective of the P2Y 12 antagonist used. Conclusion-ADP inhibits platelet aggregation in the presence of a P2Y 12 antagonist through conversion to adenosine.Inhibition occurs in PRP but not in whole blood except when adenosine uptake is inhibited. None of the P2Y 12 antagonists studied replicated the effects of dipyridamole in the experiments that were performed. Key Words: antiplatelet drugs Ⅲ arterial thrombosis Ⅲ blood cells Ⅲ cell physiology Ⅲ g proteins Ⅲ hemostasis Ⅲ platelet receptor blockers Ⅲ platelets Ⅲ thrombosis Ⅲ P2Y 12 antagonists Ⅲ adenosine A DP is a well-known platelet agonist that induces platelet aggregation. It is secreted from platelets themselves when they undergo a release reaction and potentiates the aggregatory effects of other platelet agonists, such as thrombin and collagen. [1][2][3] The proaggregatory effects of ADP on platelets are via interaction with P2Y 1 and P2Y 12 receptors, 1-4 and one of the main effects of ADP at the P2Y 12 receptor is the inhibition of adenylate cyclase, leading to a reduction in cAMP levels and subsequent promotion of the aggregation response. Antagonists that act at P2Y 12 receptors markedly inhibit platelet aggregation, specifically by blocking the effects of ADP at this receptor, 5 thereby preventing inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Such antagonists include cangrelor, ticagrelor, and the thienopyridines clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are in use or in development as antithrombotic agents. 6 -8 Although ADP is conventionally regarded as a platelet agonist, the molecule can be broken down first to AMP and then to adenosine in blood and plasma. 9 -11 Adenosine, of course, is an inhibitor of platelet aggregation acting via A 2A and A 2B receptors on platelets to activate adenylate cyclase and increase cAMP, 12-14 and both ADP removal and adenosine production might be expected to modulate platelet function. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Such modulation may be particularly evident in the presence of a P2Y 12 antagonist that blocks the ability of the ADP to inhibit ad...
Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) has intriguing effects on platelet function in the presence of agents that raise cyclic adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate (cAMP). PGE(2) reverses inhibition of platelet aggregation by agents that stimulate cAMP production via a G(s)-linked receptor, but adds to the inhibition of platelet function brought about by agents that raise cAMP through other mechanisms. Here, we used the EP receptor antagonists DG-041 (which acts at the EP3 receptor) and ONO-AE3-208 (which acts at the EP4 receptor) to investigate the role of these receptors in mediating these effects of PGE(2). Platelet aggregation was measured in platelet-rich plasma obtained from healthy volunteers in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) using single platelet counting. The effects of a range of concentrations of PGE(2) were determined in the presence of (1) the prostacyclin mimetic iloprost, which operates through G(s)-linked IP receptors, (2) the cAMP PDE inhibitor DN9693 and (3) the direct-acting adenylate cyclase stimulator forskolin. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation was also determined as a measure of cAMP. PGE(2) reversed the inhibition of aggregation brought about by iloprost; this was prevented in the presence of the EP3 antagonist DG-041, indicating that this effect of PGE(2) is mediated via the EP3 receptor. In contrast, PGE(2) added to the inhibition of aggregation brought about by DN9693 or forskolin; this was reversed by the EP4 antagonist ONO-AE3-208, indicating that this effect of PGE(2) is mediated via the EP4 receptor. Effects on aggregation were accompanied by corresponding changes in VASP phosphorylation. The dominant role of EP3 receptors circumstances where cAMP is increased through a Gs-linked mechanism may be relevant to the situation in vivo where platelets are maintained in an inactive state through constant exposure to prostacyclin, and thus the main effect of PGE(2) may be prothrombotic. If so, the results described here further support the potential use of an EP3 receptor antagonist in the control of atherothrombosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.