With an increasing number of patients on maintenance haemodialysis treatment, providing satisfactory, long-lasting vascular access becomes critically important. There are a large number of reports of the relative success rates of various forms of vascular access, but there is general agreement that the Brescia-Cimino wrist fistula ( I ) is the most satisfactory. For the patient whose wrist fistula has failed, the surgeon has a choice of reconstructing the fistula when possible, constructing another fistula in the contralateral wrist, a brachial fistula (2) or inserting a graft of biological or synthetic origin. Grafts can be autologous (3) or allogeneic vein (4), umbilical vein ( 5 ) , bovine carotid artery (6) or synthetics such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (7) and Dacron (8). Experience has shown that long term results are poor for vein loops (9, 10) and bovine heterografts ( 1 I), although with aggressive treatment of the frequent complications of bovine grafts, it is possible to achieve a 2-year patency rate of 77 per cent (12). Umbilical vein is relatively untried, though a I-year patency rate of 50 per cent has been reported (13). Patency rates for PTFE vary from 62 per cent at I year (14) to 83 per cent (15). Reports of long term patency for PTFE are harder to find; a 2-year patency rate of 76 per cent has been reported (10) and a 3-year patency rate of 63 per cent (10).The difficulty in drawing any conclusions from these studies is that the selection criteria are unknown-grafts have a greater patency rate if inserted as a primary procedure rather than in patients whose access sites are nearing exhaustion. The first aim of the present study was to examine the need for more complex procedures than simple arteriovenous fistulas in a population without previous surgery. Thus, all patients undergoing firsttime fistula operations have been studied, rather than all fistulas, regardless of whether they were first, second or subsequent procedures. The second aim of the study was to attempt to correlate fistula failure with possible aetiological factors, in the hope of predicting those likely to have subsequent thrombotic problems. Patients and methodsBetween January 1976 and May 1981 157 consecutive patients in chronic renal failure requiring access procedures were accepted on to the dialysis programme. Six patients were excluded from analysis because of previous fistula operations elsewhere. One hundred and forty-eight patients had a first-time wrist fistula constructed, 2 patients had an exploration of the wrist revealing no suitable vessels and 1 patient had a primary brachial fistula due to bilateral cephalic cutdowns in the past. Five patients with functioning fistulas were excluded due to inadequate data; 3 were transferred to other units and 2 died. Using actuarial analysis (16). fistula patency curves were calculated for the remaining 145 patients undergoing an attempt at a first-time wrist fistula. This included the two patients undergoing an exploration of the wrist to avoid biasing the results favo...
A prospective study of the influence of blood flow at the time of operation on subsequent performance of dialysis fistulas is reported. Flow was measured in 33 consecutive arteriovenous fistulas using an electromagnetic flowmeter. During the mean follow‐up time of 7 months (range, 2–12 months), 19 fistulas were used for dialysis, 9 have not yet been used, 4 were never used because of thrombosis or failure to develop adequately, and 1 patient died before using the fistula for hemodialysis. There were 9 complications (thrombosis, stenosis, and failure to develop). Operative blood flow for these 9 fistulas averaged 221 ml/min as compared to 214 ml/min for the group with no subsequent problems. No critical flow rate below which the fistula would not develop could be defined. An analysis of influences on flow rate at the time of operation showed that there was a significant correlation between flow and blood pressure, vessel dimensions, and whole blood viscosity, but it was not possible to predict fistula failure from these data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.