Comparison was made between platelet concentrates prepared from pools of buffy coats removed from standard blood donations and stored in a glucose-free, commercially available crystalloid solution (BC-PCs) and standard platelet concentrates prepared from platelet-rich plasma (PRP-PCs). Platelet yield in BC-PCs and PRP-PCs was 59 and 75 percent of donated platelets, respectively. The number of total white cells in 1 BC-PC unit, prepared from a pool of 7 buffy coats, was 21 x 10(6), i.e., 50 times lower than that of 7 units of PRP-PCs. The in vitro values of adequate platelet quality were maintained for 10 days in BC-PCs stored in 1000-mL polyolefin bags. Prolonged bleeding times were reduced or corrected in three of three thrombocytopenic leukemic patients evaluated before and after transfusion of stored BC-PCs. Pretransfusion and 1- and 24-hour posttransfusion median platelet counts in 57 leukemic recipients during 4 months of routine transfusion of BC-PCs (n = 93) were 14, 35, and 27 x 10(9) per L, while those of PRP-PCs (n = 246) were 13, 37, and 31 x 10(9) per L, respectively. No reactions to BC-PCs were reported, but a 1.3 percent rate of reaction to PRP-PC transfusions was reported. This study indicates that BC-PCs are a good alternative to PRP-PCs for platelet support of thrombocytopenic patients.
Guidelines, algorithms and recommendations have been issued in the attempt to ensure appropriateness of transfusion practice, but the results are less than satisfactory, mainly due to the difficulty to turn paper procedures into actual practice. In our hospital we have tried to overcome this difficulty through the implementation of a quality assurance programme which includes giving the privilege of nonurgent blood prescription to a limited number of physicians and a computerized prospective audit of blood requests. The latter is performed through verification of the compliance of blood requests, which are designed to include a patient's laboratory and clinical data, with hospital guidelines for the proper use of blood. In the 12 months since implementation of the computerized prospective audit the transfusion service has evaluated 7884 requests. Of these, 63.4% (n = 4998) were for red blood cells, 21.1% (n = 1664) for platelets and 15.5% (n = 1222) for fresh frozen plasma. The prospective audit showed that 96.8% and 98.1% of requests for red units and platelets were appropriate, respectively. Conversely, approximately 27% of plasma requests did not comply with guidelines, mainly because the evidence of coagulopathy was missing. However, inappropriateness of plasma requests for elective general surgery decreased from 39% at the onset of the programme to 14% in the last trimester considered. Moreover, the evaluation by retrospective audit of the proportion of patients transfused with both red blood cells and plasma in the perioperative period out of those transfused with red blood cells only, as an indicator of unwanted reconstitution of whole blood, showed that this proportion decreased from 47.6% (320/672) in the 12 months before implementation of computerized audit to 37.8% (244/646) in the following 12 months (difference = -9.8%, 95% confidence interval of the difference from -4.5% to -15.1%; P < 0.005 by chi 2 test). Our initial experience, together with the present system, shows that (1) the restriction of nonurgent blood prescription to a group of clinicians more educated in transfusion medicine than average clinicians practicing in a large multispecialty hospital is feasible; (2) prospective audit is a useful tool for assuring the quality of blood requesting.
A program of quality assurance (QA) was adopted to improve blood transfusion practice in elective surgery at a large urban hospital. For this purpose, a cooperative multidisciplinary group was formed, key indicators were identified, and an organization was set up. Data collected by this organization in the 1-year period needed for implementation of the program indicated that blood misuse was common practice. In fact, overrequest, overtransfusion, excessive reconstitution of whole blood (i.e., concurrent transfusion of red cells and fresh-frozen plasma), and underuse of predeposit were found in all ten surgical departments of the hospital. In a pilot study, data were collected from one surgical department during and after the implementation phase of the QA program; comparison of these data showed a postimplementation reduction of about two thirds in overtransfusion, whereas overrequest, reconstitution of whole blood, and predeposit rates remained unchanged. These results prompted continuation of the program in order to reach a definitive evaluation of its effectiveness. TRANSFUSION 1988;28:166-169.
A program of quality assurance (QA) was adopted to improve blood transfusion practice in elective surgery at a large urban hospital. For this purpose, a cooperative multidisciplinary group was formed, key indicators were identified, and an organization was set up. Data collected by this organization in the 1-year period needed for implementation of the program indicated that blood misuse was common practice. In fact, overrequest, overtransfusion, excessive reconstitution of whole blood (i.e., concurrent transfusion of red cells and fresh-frozen plasma), and underuse of predeposit were found in all ten surgical departments of the hospital. In a pilot study, data were collected from one surgical department during and after the implementation phase of the QA program; comparison of these data showed a postimplementation reduction of about two thirds in overtransfusion, whereas overrequest, reconstitution of whole blood, and predeposit rates remained unchanged. These results prompted continuation of the program in order to reach a definitive evaluation of its effectiveness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.