This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of information contained in a proposal submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to a proposal of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The proposal must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write Librarian, SPE,
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractA key difficulty associated with modeling faulted reservoirs is honoring both the structure and stratigraphy while simultaneously generating models that are acceptable in terms of practical simulation run times. In this paper, we describe our approach for designing finely gridded, faulted simulation models which we then scale up using a flow based nonuniform coarsening technique that takes into account the impact of the faults. Two field examples of faulted reservoirs are presented to demonstrate the new grid design and upscaling tools and, also, to investigate the impact of faults on flow behavior.An important characteristic of our work process to generate faulted simulation models is that all of the tasks, from horizon and fault mapping to geostatistical reservoir characterization to scale up, are performed within an integrated earth modeling environment. Our grid design and scale up calculations accommodate complex fault networks and non-vertical faults (including reverse faults), although in the current implementation we allow only "logically-vertical" faults; i.e., faults with slip along the w or nominally vertical coordinate in a u, v, w stratigraphic grid. The rationale for specifying logically vertical faults is that they represent a compromise between accurately modeling fault geometry while maintaining computational efficiency when simulating flow in faulted reservoirs.Although fault geometry, which we capture with our grid design and upscaling tools, is an important component of fault transmissibility, it is not the only one. Consequently, we present a technique for modifying fault transmissibility by introducing transmissibility multipliers at fault locations in the grid. We use this technique to generate sealing faults. We then compare reservoir performance predictions based on sealing, partially communicating, and no-fault formulations. Plots of individual well performance from the field examples reveal significant differences between the three formulations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.