No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine growth and yield responses of Pisum sativum L. to defoliation by adult Sitona lineatus (L.). Seedlings grown under conventional (moldboard plowed) and conservation (chisel plowed) tillage treatments were infested for a 1‐week period with 0, 1 and 8 weevils per plant at two times: at 75% field emergence and 1 week later. After the early infestation, defoliation for the control, low and high weevil densities was about 0, 15 and 50%, respectively, while defoliation after the late infestation was about 0, 10 and 35%. An undercompensatory growth response was observed in one experiment after seedlings were subjected to moderate levels of early defoliation. Exact compensation was observed in two experiments after early infestations of low and high Sitona densities. Sitona defoliation reduced the number of pods per plant and pod length in two experiments. However, seed biomass was never significantly reduced. Averaged over all experiments, reduction in seed biomass due to high Sitona densities was 10 and 5% for early and late infestations, respectively. Tillage treatments did not affect Pisum compensatory growth response, although yield components were sometimes greater in conservation tillage than in conventional tillage, possibly due to slightly greater soil moisture in the conservation tillage plots.

The pea leaf weevil, Sitona lineatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is an important pest of pea, Pisum sativum L., in northern Idaho. Previous research revealed greater relative pea leaf weevil abundance and feeding damage in peas grown using conventional-tillage compared with no-tillage practices. However, the effects of tillage practices on early season colonization and activity by the pea leaf weevil on pea are not fully understood. Aerial traps and pitfall traps were used to assess adult colonization and relative density of adult pea leaf weevil into conventional-tillage and no-tillage pea in northern Idaho during 2005 and 2006. Feeding damage to the crop also was evaluated. During both years, aerial traps captured more pea leaf weevil in May, when crop establishment and early growth occurred, than in later months. Significantly more adult pea leaf weevils were captured in aerial traps in conventional-tillage than in no-tillage plots in May of both years. Significantly more pea leaf weevil were captured in pitfall traps in conventional-tillage plots than in no-tillage plots during the period immediately after peak aerial adult colonization in late May and early June. Crop feeding damage was significantly greater in conventional-tillage than in no-tillage plots in late May and early June. The patterns suggest that more adult pea leaf weevil colonize conventional-tillage pea than no-tillage pea. Pea plants in conventional-tillage emerged earlier and were larger than those in no-tillage during the pea leaf weevil colonization period, possibly accounting for the differences in colonization rates. This leads to greater early season pea leaf weevil infestation of conventional-tillage plots at a critical period for pea development that might ultimately influence crop yield.

Field experiments were conducted in 1997 and 1998 to evaluate the impact of resistance to Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko), on the cereal aphid complex in wheat. Two spring wheats were planted: the variety "Centennial" (Russian wheat aphid susceptible) and the advanced line IDO488 (Russian wheat aphid resistant). IDO488 incorporates the resistance found in PI 294994 into a Centennial background. Field plots were artificially infested with adult D. noxia and sampled weekly. The most abundant aphid species in 1997 were Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker), Sitobion avenae (F.), D. noxia, and Rhopalosiphum padi (L.). In 1998, the order of abundance was M. dirhodum, R. padi, S. avenae, and D. noxia. The resistant genotype had significantly fewer D. noxia than the susceptible one during both years. However, plant genotype had no significant effect on the other aphid species in either year. Both the initial density of D. noxia and plant growth stage, had a significant effect on D. noxia population development, but had no effect on the other aphid species. There was no interaction between D. noxia resistance and the population density of the other aphid species observed.

No abstract