A new polyvalent melanoma cell vaccine (MCV) was administered to 136 stage IIIA and IV (American Joint Committee on Cancer) melanoma patients. Induction of cell-mediated and humoral immune responses to common melanoma-associated antigens present on autologous melanoma cells was observed in patients receiving the new MCV. This was accompanied by increased activation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Survival correlated significantly with delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity (p = 0.0066) and antibody responses to MCV (p = 0.0117). Of 40 patients with evaluable disease, nine (23%) had regressions (three complete). From our historical database of 126 stage IIIA and 1275 stage IV melanoma patients, there were no significant changes in the natural history of metastatic melanoma during the past 20 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated prognostic significance for site of metastases (p = 0.0001) and immunotherapy with the new MCV (p = 0.0001). Overall our new MCV increased the median and 5-year survival of stage IIIA melanoma patients with regional soft tissue metastases twofold (p = 0.00024), and stage IV patients threefold (p = 0.0001) compared with previous immunotherapy and other treatments.

Background. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) uses both Breslow thickness and Clark level in its staging system for malignant melanoma. Stage I corresponds to Breslow thicknesses less than 1.5 mm and Clark levels II and III. Stage II corresponds to Breslow thicknesses of at least 1.5 mm and Clark levels IV and V. However, most investigators have found Clark level to be of no prognostic significance once Breslow thickness has been taken into consideration by multivariate analysis. Methods. The authors examined the prognostic significance of Clark level by studying patients in the large database of the John Wayne Cancer Institute. Among 5575 patients with melanoma seen during the past 20 years, complete data on microstaging by both Clark and Breslow methods were available for 3323 patients. The 5‐year survival rates were as follows: Clark II, 95%; III, 81%; IV, 68%; V, 47%. The Breslow thicknesses were as follows: < 0.75 mm, 95%; 0.75–1.49 mm, 85%; 1.5–3.99 mm, 66%;±4.0 mm, 46%. Results. By univariate analysis, both Clark level and Breslow thickness were highly significant prognostic indicators (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, Breslow thickness remained significant (P < 0.0001). However, even when Breslow thickness was included in the model, Clark level also remained highly significant (P < 0.0015). Conclusions. Decisions regarding therapy for patients with clinical Stage I melanoma should consider both Clark level and Breslow thickness of the primary lesion. When there is a discordance between the two methods of microstaging, the AJCC stage should be amended to reflect the least favorable of the two prognostic indicators.

No abstract

No abstract