Donor selection in lung transplantation (LTx) is historically based upon clinical urgency, ABO compatibility, and donor size. HLA matching is not routinely considered; however, the presence or later development of anti‐HLA antibodies is associated with poorer outcomes, particularly chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Using eplet mismatches, we aimed to determine whether donor/recipient HLA incompatibility was a significant predictor of CLAD. One hundred seventy‐five LTx undertaken at the Alfred Hospital between 2008 and 2012 met criteria. Post‐LTx monitoring was continued for at least 12 months, or until patient death. HLA typing was performed by sequence‐based typing and Luminex sequence‐specific oligonucleotide. Using HLAMatchmaker, eplet mismatches between each donor/recipient pairing were analyzed and correlated against incidences of CLAD. HLA‐DRB1/3/4/5+DQA/B eplet mismatch was a significant predictor of CLAD (hazard ratio [HR] 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–8.29 p < 0.001). When bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) were analyzed independently, HLA‐DRB1/3/4/5 + DQA/B eplet mismatch was shown to significantly predict RAS (HR 8.3, 95% CI: 2.46–27.97 p < 0.001) but not BOS (HR 1.92, 95% CI: 0.64–5.72, p = 0.237). HLA‐A/B eplet mismatch was shown not to be a significant predictor when analyzed independently but did provide additional stratification of results. This study illustrates the importance of epitope immunogenicity in defining donor–recipient immune compatibility in LTx.

No abstract

No abstract

Background. Currently, the assessment of immunological risk in lung transplantation (LTx) does not completely consider HLA compatibility at the molecular level. We have previously demonstrated the association of HLA eplets in predicting chronic lung allograft dysfunction following LTx; however, the associations between HLA eplet mismatch (epMM) loads and overall survival are unknown. Methods. In this retrospective, single-center study, 277 LTx donor-recipient pairs were high resolution HLA typed and analyzed for HLA epMMs using HLAMatchmaker (version 3.1). LTx pairs were also assessed for the presence of the previously described risk epitope mismatches DQ2-DQA1*05 and DQ7-DQA1*05. Results. HLA class I epMMs were not associated with deleterious outcomes; however, lower HLA class II (≤19), DQA1 (≤2), and combined HLA class I and II (≤29) epMM demonstrated an association with increased time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction and improved overall survival. The presence of a risk epitope mismatch was not associated with worse clinical outcomes. Conclusions. HLA epMM can risk-stratify LTx recipients and potentially guide donor-recipient matching and immunosuppression strategies.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract