Prostatic subclinical inflammation is not associated with high urinary PSA. Unless associated with glandular epithelial disruption, density of prostatic interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate is not significantly correlated with serum PSA concentration. We believe that this issue should be considered when interpreting a prostate biopsy.

Objectives  To determine the acceptability by patients of ultrasound‐guided prostatic biopsy without anaesthesia. Patients and methods  From January 1995 to January 1996, 81 patients in our department undergoing transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsy were asked to assess the tolerability of the procedure using an immediate post‐operative questionnaire including a 10 cm linear visual analogue scale (VAS). Results  The mean VAS score was 3 (standard error 0.24) and 16% of the patients had a VAS score of ≥5. Responses to the questionnaire showed that 6% of patients judged that the procedure should have been performed under general anaesthesia, while 19% would not agree to undergo it again without some form of anaesthesia. Conclusions  Even when anaesthesia‐free, transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostatic biopsy was felt to be only mildly uncomfortable by most patients, but 19% judged that it should be accompanied by some form of anaesthesia. Consequently, local anaesthetic techniques to enhance tolerance to this type of intervention without sacrificing the advantages of the current out‐patient setting should be reassessed.

Optimizing kidney preservation is a primary issue in transplantation, particularly in relation to new donor sources, such as expanded criteria donors (ECDs) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). Kidneys from these donors are highly sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion injuries--the emblematic lesions encountered during transplantation. Despite years of research, static cold storage, with solutions designed in the 1980s, remains the gold standard in kidney transplantation. This kind of preservation, however, is unable to fully protect an ECD or DCD kidney, highlighting the need for novel strategies to improve kidney preservation or promote kidney recovery. This Review provides an overview of the emerging strategies to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injuries in donor kidneys and describes strategies that are aimed at the donor, organ or recipient to improve graft outcome. These approaches include management of donors, preconditioning of the kidney, improvements in organ preservation solutions, postconditioning and regenerative therapies of the kidney graft following transplantation. In addition, machine perfusion provides an interesting opportunity to evaluate kidney graft quality before transplantation. Overall, a combination of therapeutic approaches seem to provide the best outcome, but preclinical studies using relevant models are needed before these approaches can be incorporated into clinical practice.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a useful method in the diagnostic work-up of adrenal mass with excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy.

No abstract

Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) are highly sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion injury and thus require careful reconditioning, such as normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). However, the optimal NRP protocol remains to be characterized. NRP was modeled in a DCD porcine model (30 minutes of cardiac arrest) for 2, 4, or 6 hours compared to a control group (No-NRP); kidneys were machine-preserved and allotransplanted. NRP appeared to permit recovery from warm ischemia, possibly due to an increased expression of HIF1α-dependent survival pathway. At 2 hours, blood levels of ischemic injury biomarkers increased: creatinine, lactate/pyruvate ratio, LDH, AST, NGAL, KIM-1, CD40 ligand, and soluble-tissue-factor. All these markers then decreased with time; however, AST, NGAL, and KIM-1 increased again at 6 hours. Hemoglobin and platelets decreased at 6 hours, after which the procedure became difficult to maintain. Regarding inflammation, active tissue-factor, cleaved PAR-2 and MCP-1 increased by 4-6 hours, but not TNF-α and iNOS. Compared to No-NRP, NRP kidneys showed lower resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), likely associated with pe-NRP eNOS activation. Kidneys transplanted after 4 and 6 hours of NRP showed better function and outcome, compared to No-NRP. In conclusion, our results confirm the mechanistic benefits of NRP and highlight 4 hours as its optimal duration, after which injury markers appear.

Multivariate analysis of lesion biomarkers during kidney perfusion using NMR data could be an interesting tool to assess graft quality, particularly because analyses times (2 hr total) are compatible with clinical application.

Despite the fact that a significant fraction of kidney graft dysfunctions observed after transplantation is due to ischemia-reperfusion injuries, there is still no clear consensus regarding optimal kidney preservation strategy. This stems directly from the fact that as of yet, the mechanisms underlying ischemia-reperfusion injury are poorly defined, and the role of each preservation parameter is not clearly outlined. In the meantime, as donor demography changes, organ quality is decreasing which directly increases the rate of poor outcome. This situation has an impact on clinical guidelines and impedes their possible harmonization in the transplant community, which has to move towards changing organ preservation paradigms: new concepts must emerge and the definition of a new range of adapted preservation method is of paramount importance. This review presents existing barriers in transplantation (e.g., temperature adjustment and adequate protocol, interest for oxygen addition during preservation, and clear procedure for organ perfusion during machine preservation), discusses the development of novel strategies to overcome them, and exposes the importance of identifying reliable biomarkers to monitor graft quality and predict short and long-term outcomes. Finally, perspectives in therapeutic strategies will also be presented, such as those based on stem cells and their derivatives and innovative models on which they would need to be properly tested.