Background: Universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water and adequate sanitation and hygiene in Indonesia are vital to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
Objectives: To quantify subnational regional inequality in access to improved drinking water and sanitation in Indonesia.
Methods: Data about access to improved drinking water and sanitation were derived from the 2015 Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS) and disaggregated by 510 districts across the 34 provinces of Indonesia. Two summary measures of inequality, mean difference from mean and weighted index of disparity, were calculated to quantify within-province absolute and relative inequality, respectively.
Results: While the majority of Indonesian households had access to improved drinking water (71.0%) and sanitation (62.1%), there were large variations between and within provinces. Access to improved drinking water ranged from 93.4% in DKI Jakarta to 41.1% in Bengkulu, and access to improved sanitation ranged from 89.3% in Jakarta to 23.9% in East Nusa Tenggara. Provinces with similar numbers of districts and similar overall averages showed variable levels of absolute and/or relative inequality. Certain districts reported very low levels of access to improved drinking water and/or sanitation.
Conclusions: There are inequalities in access to improved drinking water and sanitation by subnational region in Indonesia. Monitoring within-country inequality in these indicators serves to identify underserved areas, and is useful for developing approaches to improve inequalities in access that can help Indonesia make progress towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) systems are the optimal source for data on births, deaths and causes of death for health policy, program evaluation, and research. In Indonesia, indicators such as life expectancy at birth, infant and maternal mortality rates, and cause-specific death rates need to be routinely monitored for national health policy. However, the CRVS system has not yet been fully established, which creates a challenge for evidence-based health action. In 2019, the Indonesian government released a national strategy for accelerating the CRVS system, with targets for improved coverage and data quality by 2024. This article describes findings from a program of formative and implementation research to guide the application of the national strategy. At first, a detailed CRVS assessment and gap analysis was undertaken using an international framework. The assessment findings were used to develop a revised business process model for reporting deaths and their causes at village, sub district and district level. In addition, a field instruction manual was also developed to guide personnel in implementation. Two field sites in Java – Malang District and Kudus Regency were selected for pilot testing the reporting procedures, and relevant site preparation and training was carried out. Data compilations for Malang in 2019 and Kudus in 2020 were analyzed to derive mortality indicators. High levels of death reporting completeness (83 to 89%) were reported from both districts, along with plausible cause-specific mortality profiles, although the latter need further validation. The study findings establish the feasibility of implementing revised death reporting procedures at the local level, as well as demonstrate sustainability through institutionalization and capacity building, and can be used to accelerate further development of the CRVS system in Indonesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.