In the critical care setting, α-2 agonists present a multifaceted profile: sedation combined with arousability, suppression of delirium, preservation of respiratory drive, reduced O(2) consumption, preserved renal function, and reduced protein metabolism. In addition, this review details the reduced arterial impedance, improved left ventricular performance, preserved vascular reactivity to exogenous amines, preserved cardiac baroreflex reactivity, preserved vasomotor baroreflex activity combined with a lowered pressure set point: these features may explain the good tolerance observed when α-2 agonists are used as continuous infusion without any loading dose. Reviewing the literature allows one to suggest that a new management appears possible with arousable sedation. However, it remains to be demonstrated whether this arousable sedation can be combined with the preservation of spontaneous ventilation, in the setting of severe respiratory distress, as opposed to conventional controlled mechanical ventilation combined with conventional sedation. Should such a speculative view be confirmed, then α-2 agonists will move from second-line sedative agents to first-line sedative agents. However, key studies are lacking to demonstrate the effect of α-2 agonists on physiological endpoints and outcome. Presently, the existing body of data suggests a niche for the use of α-2 agonists in the critical care setting.

Background We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on mental health of professionals working in the intensive care unit (ICU) according to the intensity of the epidemic in France. Methods This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 77 French hospitals from April 22 to May 13 2020. All ICU frontline healthcare workers were eligible. The primary endpoint was the mental health, assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Sources of stress during the crisis were assessed using the Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units (PS-ICU) scale. Epidemic intensity was defined as high or low for each region based on publicly available data from Santé Publique France. Effects were assessed using linear mixed models, moderation and mediation analyses. Results In total, 2643 health professionals participated; 64.36% in high-intensity zones. Professionals in areas with greater epidemic intensity were at higher risk of mental health issues (p < 0.001), and higher levels of overall perceived stress (p < 0.001), compared to low-intensity zones. Factors associated with higher overall perceived stress were female sex (B = 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08–0.17), having a relative at risk of COVID-19 (B = 0.14; 95%-CI = 0.09–0.18) and working in high-intensity zones (B = 0.11; 95%-CI = 0.02–0.20). Perceived stress mediated the impact of the crisis context on mental health (B = 0.23, 95%-CI = 0.05, 0.41) and the impact of stress on mental health was moderated by positive thinking, b = − 0.32, 95% CI = − 0.54, − 0.11. Conclusion COVID-19 negatively impacted the mental health of ICU professionals. Professionals working in zones where the epidemic was of high intensity were significantly more affected, with higher levels of perceived stress. This study is supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRC-COVID 2020).

No abstract

Progress over the last 50 years has led to a decline in mortality from ≈70% to ≈20% in the best series of patients with septic shock. Nevertheless, refractory septic shock still carries a mortality close to 100%. In the best series, the mortality appears related to multiple organ failure linked to comorbidities and/or an intense inflammatory response: shortening the period that the subject is exposed to circulatory instability may further lower mortality. Treatment aims at reestablishing circulation within a “central” compartment (i.e., brain, heart, and lung) but fails to reestablish a disorganized microcirculation or an adequate response to noradrenaline, the most widely used vasopressor. Indeed, steroids, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, or donors have not achieved overwhelming acceptance in the setting of septic shock. Counterintuitively, α 2-adrenoceptor agonists were shown to reduce noradrenaline requirements in two cases of human septic shock. This has been replicated in rat and sheep models of sepsis. In addition, some data show that α 2-adrenoceptor agonists lead to an improvement in the microcirculation. Evidence-based documentation of the effects of alpha-2 agonists is needed in the setting of human septic shock.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: In the setting of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO 2 to F i O 2 ratio < 100), the cut-off point for switching from non-invasive ventilation to tracheal intubation combined with mechanical ventilation is poorly defined. Results:The swift resolution over 10 h of a severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (PaO 2 /F i O 2 = 57) caused by aspiration following heroin overdose, using non-invasive ventilation with high positive end expiratory pressure 15−20 cm H 2 O) along with low pressure support (8 cm H 2 O) is reported. The success in treating non-invasively severe hypoxia was presumably linked to a highly restricted subset: healthy young patient, minimal alteration of consciousness, non-combativeness, absence of severe metabolic acidosis, quick resolution of supraventricular arrhythmia, one-to-one supervision by the intensivist in the critical care unit. Conclusion: Given the complications associated with tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation on the one hand, and with delayed intubation on the other hand, high PEEP-NIV may warrant study in a restricted set of patients closely monitored in a critical care environment.