The objective of this study was to assess how the relative efficiency of N95 respirators and surgical masks might vary with different challenge aerosols, utilizing a standardized manikin head form as a surrogate to human participation. A Collision nebulizer aerosolized B. anthracis Sterne strain endospores and polystyrene latex (PSL) particles to evaluate 11 models of N95 respirators and surgical masks. An automated breathing simulator, calibrated to normal tidal volume and active breathing rate, mimicked human respiration. A manikin head form with N95 respirators or surgical masks, and manikin head form without N95 respirators or surgical masks were placed in the bioaerosol chamber. An AGI-30 sampler filled with phosphate buffered water was fitted behind the mouth of each manikin head form to collect endospore bioaerosol samples. PSL aerosols concentrations were quantified by an ARTI Hand Held Particle Counter. Geometric Mean (GM) relative efficiency of N95 respirators and surgical masks challenged with endospore bioaerosol ranged from 34-65%. In PSL aerosol experiments, GM relative efficiency ranged from 35-64% for 1.3 μm particles. GM filtration efficiency of all N95 and surgical N95 respirators filter media evaluated was ≥99% when challenged with particles ≥0.1 μm. GM filtration efficiency of surgical mask filter media ranged from 70-83% with particles ≥0.1 μm and 74-92% with 1.3 μm PSL particles. Relative efficiencies of N95 respirators and surgical masks challenged with aerosolized B. anthracis endospores and PSL were similar. Relative efficiency was similar between N95 respirators and surgical masks on a manikin head form despite clear differences in filtration efficiency. This study further highlights the importance of face seal leakage in the respiratory protection provided by N95 respirators, and demonstrates it on a human surrogate.
Aerosolized disinfectant use has appealing qualities for inactivation and remediation of biologically contaminated materials. Their ability to reach exterior and interior spaces of walls and difficult to access areas has potential as a simple and cost effective remediation technique. Stachybotrys chartarum was used as a test organism against four disinfectants: chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite, thiabendazole, and cupric sulfate – sodium hydroxide solution. Tests were conducted independently. The organism was exposed for 4 and 8 h periods to the aerosolized disinfectant. The building material was commercially available gypsum board with paper facing. This material was inoculated under sterile conditions. The commercially available treatments were administered as aerosols generated from a collison nebulizer directed into a sterile growth chamber housing inoculated gypsum board. Surface samples were collected before and after exposures to determine treatment effects. The aerosolized chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite treatments successfully inactivated the organism after 8 h of continuous exposure. Key words: Stachybotrys chartarum, aerosolized disinfectant, gypsum board, fungi.
The ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) dose necessary to inactivate fungal spores on an agar surface and the efficacy of UVGI were determined for cultures of Stachybotrys chartarum (ATCC 208877). This study employed a UVGI testing unit consisting of four chambers with a 9-W, Phillips, low pressure, mercury UVGI lamp in each chamber. The testing unit's apertures were adjusted to provide 50, 100, 150, and 200 microW/cm2 of uniform flux to the Petri dish surfaces, resulting in a total UVGI surface dose ranging from 12 to 144 mJ/cm2. The UVGI dose necessary to inactivate 90% of the S. chartarum was greater than the maximum dose of 144 mJ/cm2 evaluated in this study. While UVGI has been used to inactivate several strains of culturable fungal spores, S. chartarum was not susceptible to an appropriate dose of UVGI. The results of this study may not correlate directly to the effect of UVGI on airborne fungal spores. However, they indicate that current technology may not be efficacious as a supplement to ventilation unless it can provide higher doses of UVGI to kill spores, such as S. chartarum, traveling through the irradiated zone.
Aerosol droplet- and airborne-transmitted diseases are an important healthcare concern. The anthrax attacks of 2001, severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreaks in 2003 which resulted in transmission to numerous healthcare personnel (HCP) and concerns about smallpox as a bioterrorist agent have contributed to heightened concern about airborne infectious agents. Respirators and surgical masks can provide respiratory protection against such airborne diseases but their efficacy needs to be assessed. This study describes a method for quantitatively assessing the relative efficiency of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) when challenged with a bioaerosol. Five surgical masks, three N95 respirators and three surgical N95 respirators were evaluated. All are commercially available and used in US healthcare settings. Bacterial aerosols of vegetative Bacillus anthracis strain Sterne 34F2 (a surrogate for pathogenic B. anthracis) were generated with a six-jet Collison nebuliser. To mimic human respiratory breathing, an automated breathing simulator (ABS) calibrated to normal tidal volume and active breathing rate (500 mL/breath and 20 breath/min, respectively) was used. Respirators were placed on manikin head-forms designed for use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and used in our investigation as surrogates for HCP. The method showed that a Collison nebuliser could generate monodisperse bacterial aerosol to effectively test RPE total inward leakage. Also, the AGI-30 air samplers, combined with the ABS, provided an accurate method of quantifying RPE relative efficiency. For the 11 RPE this ranged from 34% to 69% with statistically significant differences between several RPE models. We conclude that neither RPE type nor brand name was an indicator of RPE relative efficiency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.