Background While human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have been tested in ischemic cardiomyopathy, few studies exist in chronic non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Objectives The POSEIDON-DCM trial is a randomized comparison of safety and efficacy of autologous (auto) vs. allogeneic (allo) bone marrow-derived hMSCs in NIDCM. Methods Thirty-seven patients were randomized to either allo- or auto-hMSCs in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were recruited between December 2011 and July 2015 at the University of Miami Hospital. Patients (age: 55.8 ± 11.2; 32% female) received hMSCs (100 million) by transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI) in ten left ventricular sites by NOGA Catheter. Treated patients were evaluated at baseline, 30 days, 3-, 6-, and 12-months for safety: serious adverse events (SAE), and efficacy endpoints: Ejection Fraction (EF), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), MACE, and immune-biomarkers. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT01392625. Results There were no 30-day treatment-emergent (TE)-SAEs. 12-month SAE incidence was 28.2% (95% CI: 12.8, 55.1) in allo, and 63.5% (95% CI: 40.8, 85.7; p=0.1004) in auto. One allo-group patient developed an elevated donor specific cPRA. EF increased in allo by 8.0 units (95% Cl: 2.8, 13.2; p=0.004), and in auto: 5.4 units (95% Cl: −1.4, 12.1; p=0.116, allo vs. auto p=0.4887). 6MWT increased for allo: 37.0 meters (95% Cl: 2.0 to 72.0; p=0.04), but not auto: 7.3 meters (95% Cl: −47.8, 33.3; p=0.71, auto vs. allo p=0.0168). MLHFQ score decreased in allo (p=0.0022), and auto (p=0.463; p=0.172). The MACE rate was lower in allo vs. auto (p=0.0186). Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) decreased (p=0.0001 for each), to a greater extent in allo vs. auto at six-months (p=0.05). Conclusion These findings demonstrate safety and support greater, clinically meaningful efficacy of allo-hMSC vs. auto-hMSC in NIDCM patients. Pivotal trials of allo-hMSCs are warranted based on these results.

BackgroundAging frailty, characterized by decreased physical and immunological functioning, is associated with stem cell depletion. Human allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (allo-hMSCs) exert immunomodulatory effects and promote tissue repair.MethodsThis is a randomized, double-blinded, dose-finding study of intravenous allo-hMSCs (100 or 200-million [M]) vs placebo delivered to patients (n = 30, mean age 75.5 ± 7.3) with frailty. The primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TE-SAEs) at 1-month postinfusion. Secondary endpoints included physical performance, patient-reported outcomes, and immune markers of frailty measured at 6 months postinfusion.ResultsNo therapy-related TE-SAEs occurred at 1 month. Physical performance improved preferentially in the 100M-group; immunologic improvement occurred in both the 100M- and 200M-groups. The 6-minute walk test, short physical performance exam, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved in the 100M-group (p = .01), not in the 200M- or placebo groups. The female sexual quality of life questionnaire improved in the 100M-group (p = .03). Serum TNF-α levels decreased in the 100M-group (p = .03). B cell intracellular TNF-α improved in both the 100M- (p < .0001) and 200M-groups (p = .002) as well as between groups compared to placebo (p = .003 and p = .039, respectively). Early and late activated T-cells were also reduced by MSC therapy.ConclusionIntravenous allo-hMSCs were safe in individuals with aging frailty. Treated groups had remarkable improvements in physical performance measures and inflammatory biomarkers, both of which characterize the frailty syndrome. Given the excellent safety and efficacy profiles demonstrated in this study, larger clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy of hMSCs in this multisystem disorder.Clinical Trial Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov: CRATUS (#NCT02065245).

BACKGROUND Both bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and c-kit+ cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve left ventricular remodeling in porcine models and clinical trials. We previously showed, using xenogeneic (human) cells in immunosuppressed animals with acute ischemic heart disease, that these 2 cell types act synergistically in combination. OBJECTIVES To more accurately model the clinical situation, we tested whether the combination of autologous MSCs and CSCs produced greater improvement of cardiac performance than MSCs alone in a nonimmunosuppressed porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS Three months after ischemia/reperfusion infusion injury, Gottingen mini-swine were injected transendocardially with MSCs alone (n = 6) or in combination with cardiac-derived CSCs (n = 8), MSCs, or placebo (vehicle; n = 6). Cardiac functional and anatomic parameters were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline and before and after therapy. RESULTS Both groups of cell-treated animals exhibited significantly reduced scar size (MSCs: −44.1 ± 6.8%; CSC/MSC: −37.2 ± 5.4%; placebo: −12 ± 4.2%; p < 0.0001), increased viable tissue, and improved wall motion relative to placebo 3 months post-injection. Ejection fraction (EF) improved (MSCs: +2.9 ± 1.6; CSC/MSC: +6.9 ± 2.8; placebo: +2.5 ± 1.6 EF units; p = 0.0009), as did stroke volume, cardiac output, and diastolic strain, but only in the combination-treated animals, which also exhibited increased cardiomyocyte mitotic activity. CONCLUSIONS These findings illustrate that interactions between MSCs and CSCs enhance cardiac performance more than MSCs alone, establish the safety of autologous cell combination strategies, and support the development of second-generation cell therapeutic products.

Although protein S-nitrosylation is increasingly recognized as mediating nitric oxide (NO) signaling, roles for protein denitrosylation in physiology remain unknown. Here, we show that S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), an enzyme that governs levels of S-nitrosylation by promoting protein denitrosylation, regulates both peripheral vascular tone and β-adrenergic agonist-stimulated cardiac contractility, previously ascribed exclusively to NO/cGMP. GSNOR-deficient mice exhibited reduced peripheral vascular tone and depressed β-adrenergic inotropic responses that were associated with impaired β-agonist-induced denitrosylation of cardiac ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2), resulting in calcium leak. These results indicate that systemic hemodynamic responses (vascular tone and cardiac contractility), both under basal conditions and after adrenergic activation, are regulated through concerted actions of NO synthase/GSNOR and that aberrant denitrosylation impairs cardiovascular function. Our findings support the notion that dynamic S-nitrosylation/denitrosylation reactions are essential in cardiovascular regulation.excitation-contraction coupling | nitroso-redox imbalance G uanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent and -independent signaling by nitric oxide (NO) has been described in many organ systems, including the cardiovascular (CV) system (1, 2). Accumulating evidence indicates that the principal non-cGMP signal is effected by the covalent attachment of NO to the thiol group of cysteine (Cys) residues (Snitrosylation) (3) and that this posttranslational modification may influence cardiac contractility (4) and peripheral vascular resistance (5) through effects on ion channels (6) and adrenergic receptors (7). Because deletion or inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) diminishes all forms of NO bioactivity and thus impairs both cGMP and S-nitrosylation signaling, it has been difficult to elucidate the exact roles of S-nitrosylation vs. cGMP in CV regulation.Investigation of the role of S-nitrosylation in cellular signaling has been aided by discovery of enzymes that metabolize Snitrosothiols (SNOs) without affecting NOS activity or levels of NO itself (mammalian enzymes that directly metabolize NO have not been identified) (8-10). In particular, S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), an enzyme involved in the removal of NO groups from Cys thiols in proteins (SNO-proteins) through metabolism of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO, which is in equilibrium with SNO-proteins), has been ascribed an indispensable role in regulating S-nitrosylation in the CV system (9). Although GSNOR does not affect baseline blood pressure, it mitigates hypotension induced by anesthetics and infectious agents (5) and plays an essential role in regulating both β-adrenergic receptor expression and responsiveness in the heart (7). These studies suggest that SNOs may exert physiological roles in the control of systemic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility.In the CV system, endothelial NOS (NOS3, eNOS) and neuronal NOS (NOS1, nNOS) subserve endothe...

BackgroundEndothelial dysfunction, characterized by diminished endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) function and flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), is a clinically significant feature of heart failure (HF). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which have pro-angiogenic properties, have the potential to restore endothelial function. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that MSCs increase EPC function and restore flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD).MethodsIdiopathic dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy patients were randomly assigned to receive autologous (n = 7) or allogeneic (n = 15) MSCs. We assessed EPC-colony forming units (EPC-CFUs), FMD, and circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients before and three months after MSC transendocardial injection (n = 22) and in healthy controls (n = 10).FindingsEPC-colony forming units (CFUs) were markedly reduced in HF compared to healthy controls (4 ± 3 vs. 25 ± 16 CFUs, P < 0.0001). Similarly, FMD% was impaired in HF (5.6 ± 3.2% vs. 9.0 ± 3.3%, P = 0.01). Allogeneic, but not autologous, MSCs improved endothelial function three months after treatment (Δ10 ± 5 vs. Δ1 ± 3 CFUs, P = 0.0067; Δ3.7 ± 3% vs. Δ-0.46 ± 3% FMD, P = 0.005). Patients who received allogeneic MSCs had a reduction in serum VEGF levels three months after treatment, while patients who received autologous MSCs had an increase (P = 0.0012), and these changes correlated with the change in EPC-CFUs (P < 0.0001). Lastly, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with impaired vasculogenesis due to pharmacologic nitric oxide synthase inhibition, were rescued by allogeneic MSC conditioned medium (P = 0.006).InterpretationThese findings reveal a novel mechanism whereby allogeneic, but not autologous, MSC administration results in the proliferation of functional EPCs and improvement in vascular reactivity, which in turn restores endothelial function towards normal in patients with HF. These findings have significant clinical and biological implications for the use of MSCs in HF and other disorders associated with endothelial dysfunction.

Rationale Accumulating data supports a therapeutic role for mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy; however, there is no consensus on the optimal route of delivery. Objective We tested the hypothesis that the route of MSC delivery influences the reduction in infarct size (IS) and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and Results We performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of MSC therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) preclinical studies (58 studies; n=1165 mouse, rat, swine) which revealed a reduction in IS and improvement of LVEF in all animal models. Route of delivery was analyzed in AMI swine studies and clinical trials (6 clinical trials; n=334 patients). In AMI swine studies, transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI) reduced IS (n=49, 9.4% reduction 95%CI −15.9, −3.0), whereas intramyocardial injection (DI), intravenous infusion (IV), and intracoronary infusion (IC) indicated no improvement. Similarly, TESI improved LVEF (n=65, 9.1% increase 95%CI 3.7, 14.5), as did DI and IV, while IC demonstrated no improvement. In humans, changes of LVEF paralleled these results, with TESI improving LVEF (n=46, 7.0% increase 95%CI 2.7, 11.3), as did IV, but again IC demonstrating no improvement. Conclusions MSC therapy improves cardiac function in animal models of both AMI and ICM. The route of delivery appears to play a role in modulating the efficacy of MSC therapy in AMI swine studies and clinical trials, suggesting the superiority of TESI due to its reduction in IS and improvement of LVEF, which has important implications for the design of future studies.

BackgroundImpaired endogenous stem cell repair capacity is hypothesized to be a biologic basis of frailty. Therapies that restore regenerative capacity may therefore be beneficial. This Phase 1 study evaluated the safety and potential efficacy of intravenous, allogeneic, human mesenchymal stem cell (allo-hMSC)-based therapy in patients with aging frailty.MethodsIn this nonrandomized, dose-escalation study, patients received a single intravenous infusion of allo-hMSCs: 20-million (n = 5), 100-million (n = 5), or 200-million cells (n = 5). The primary endpoint was incidence of any treatment-emergent serious adverse events measured at 1 month postinfusion. The secondary endpoints were functional efficacy domains and inflammatory biomarkers, measured at 3 and 6 months, respectively.ResultsThere were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events at 1-month postinfusion or significant donor-specific immune reactions during the first 6 months. There was one death at 258 days postinfusion in the 200-million group. In all treatment groups, 6-minute walk distance increased at 3 months (p = .02) and 6 months (p = .001) and TNF-α levels decreased at 6 months (p < .0001). Overall, the 100-million dose showed the best improvement in all parameters, with the exception of TNF-α, which showed an improvement in both the 100- and 200-million groups (p = .0001 and p = .0001, respectively). The 100-million cell-dose group also showed significant improvements in the physical component of the SF-36 quality of life assessment at all time points relative to baseline.ConclusionsAllo-hMSCs are safe and immunologically tolerated in aging frailty patients. Improvements in functional and immunologic status suggest that ongoing clinical development of cell-based therapy is warranted for frailty.

Although nitric oxide (NO) signaling promotes differentiation and maturation of endothelial progenitor cells, its role in the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into endothelial cells remains controversial. We tested the role of NO signaling in MSCs derived from WT mice and mice homozygous for a deletion of S -nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR −/− ), a denitrosylase that regulates S -nitrosylation. GSNOR −/− MSCs exhibited markedly diminished capacity for vasculogenesis in an in vitro Matrigel tube–forming assay and in vivo relative to WT MSCs. This decrease was associated with down-regulation of the PDGF receptorα (PDGFRα) in GSNOR −/− MSCs, a receptor essential for VEGF-A action in MSCs. Pharmacologic inhibition of NO synthase with L-N G -nitroarginine methyl ester ( L -NAME) and stimulation of growth hormone–releasing hormone receptor (GHRHR) with GHRH agonists augmented VEGF-A production and normalized tube formation in GSNOR −/− MSCs, whereas NO donors or PDGFR antagonist reduced tube formation ∼50% by murine and human MSCs. The antagonist also blocked the rescue of tube formation in GSNOR −/− MSCs by L -NAME or the GHRH agonists JI-38, MR-409, and MR-356. Therefore, GSNOR −/− MSCs have a deficient capacity for endothelial differentiation due to downregulation of PDGFRα related to NO/GSNOR imbalance. These findings unravel important aspects of modulation of MSCs by VEGF-A activation of the PDGFR and illustrate a paradoxical inhibitory role of S -nitrosylation signaling in MSC vasculogenesis. Accordingly, disease states characterized by NO deficiency may trigger MSC-mediated vasculogenesis. These findings have important implications for therapeutic application of GHRH agonists to ischemic disorders.