To demonstrate the safety of transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI) with autologous MSCs and BMCs in patients with ICM.• To assess prespecified outcomes of efficacy.

Administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to diseased hearts improves cardiac function and reduces scar size. These effects occur via the stimulation of endogenous repair mechanisms, including regulation of immune responses, tissue perfusion, inhibition of fibrosis, and proliferation of resident cardiac cells, although rare events of transdifferentiation into cardiomyocytes and vascular components are also described in animal models. While these improvements demonstrate the potential of stem cell therapy, the goal of full cardiac recovery has yet to be realized in either preclinical or clinical studies. To reach this goal, novel cell-based therapeutic approaches are needed. Ongoing studies include cell combinations, incorporation of MSCs into biomaterials, or pre-conditioning or genetic manipulation of MSCs to boost their release of paracrine factors, such as exosomes, growth factors, microRNAs, etc. All of these approaches can augment therapeutic efficacy. Further study of the optimal route of administration, the correct dose, the best cell population(s), and timing for treatment are parameters that still need to be addressed in order to achieve the goal of complete cardiac regeneration. Despite significant progress, many challenges remain.

BACKGROUND Both bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and c-kit+ cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve left ventricular remodeling in porcine models and clinical trials. We previously showed, using xenogeneic (human) cells in immunosuppressed animals with acute ischemic heart disease, that these 2 cell types act synergistically in combination. OBJECTIVES To more accurately model the clinical situation, we tested whether the combination of autologous MSCs and CSCs produced greater improvement of cardiac performance than MSCs alone in a nonimmunosuppressed porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS Three months after ischemia/reperfusion infusion injury, Gottingen mini-swine were injected transendocardially with MSCs alone (n = 6) or in combination with cardiac-derived CSCs (n = 8), MSCs, or placebo (vehicle; n = 6). Cardiac functional and anatomic parameters were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline and before and after therapy. RESULTS Both groups of cell-treated animals exhibited significantly reduced scar size (MSCs: −44.1 ± 6.8%; CSC/MSC: −37.2 ± 5.4%; placebo: −12 ± 4.2%; p < 0.0001), increased viable tissue, and improved wall motion relative to placebo 3 months post-injection. Ejection fraction (EF) improved (MSCs: +2.9 ± 1.6; CSC/MSC: +6.9 ± 2.8; placebo: +2.5 ± 1.6 EF units; p = 0.0009), as did stroke volume, cardiac output, and diastolic strain, but only in the combination-treated animals, which also exhibited increased cardiomyocyte mitotic activity. CONCLUSIONS These findings illustrate that interactions between MSCs and CSCs enhance cardiac performance more than MSCs alone, establish the safety of autologous cell combination strategies, and support the development of second-generation cell therapeutic products.

Background The combination of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cardiac stem cells (CSCs) synergistically reduces scar size and improves cardiac function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Whereas allogeneic (allo-)MSCs are immunoevasive, the capacity of CSCs to similarly elude the immune system remains controversial, potentially limiting the success of allogeneic cell combination therapy (ACCT). Objective We tested the hypothesis that ACCT synergistically promotes cardiac regeneration without provoking immunologic reactions. Methods Gottingen swine with experimental ischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to receive transendocardial injections of either allo-MSC + allo-CSC (ACCT: 200 million MSCs/1 million CSCs, n=7), 200 million allo-MSC (n=8), 1 million allo-CSC (n=4), or placebo (Plasma-Lyte A, n=6)]. Swine were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMR) and pressure volume catheterization. Immune response was tested by histological analyses. Results Both ACCT and allo-MSCs reduced scar size by −11.1±4.8%, (p=0.012) and −9.5±4.8 (p=0.047), respectively. Only ACCT, but not MSC or CSC, prevented ongoing negative remodeling by offsetting increases in chamber volumes. Importantly, ACCT exerted the greatest effect on systolic function, improving the end-systolic pressure volume relation (+0.98±0.41 mmHg/mL, p=0.016) The ACCT group had more phospho-histone H3 (pHH3)+ (a marker of mitosis) cardiomyocytes (p=0.04), and non-cardiomyocytes (p=0.0002) compared to the placebo group in some regions of the heart. Inflammatory sites in ACCT and MSC swine contained immunotolerant CD3+/CD25+/FoxP3 regulatory T cells (p<0.0001). Histologic analysis showed absent to low grade inflammatory infiltrates without cardiomyocyte necrosis. Conclusion ACCT demonstrates synergistic effects to enhance cardiac regeneration and left ventricular functional recovery in a swine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy without adverse immunological reaction. Clinical translation to humans is warranted.

BACKGROUND Pim1 kinase plays an important role in cell division, survival, and commitment of precursor cells towards a myocardial lineage, and overexpression of Pim1 in ckit+ cardiac stem cell (CSC) enhances their cardioreparative properties. OBJECTIVES We sought to validate the effect of Pim1-modified CSCs in a translationally relevant large animal preclinical model of myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS Human CSCs (hCSCs, n = 10), hckit+ CSCs overexpressing Pim1 (Pim1+; n = 9), or placebo (n = 10) were delivered by intramyocardial injection to immunosuppressed Yorkshire swine (n = 29) 2 weeks after MI. Cardiac magnetic resonance and pressure volume loops were obtained before and after cell administration. RESULTS Whereas both hCSCs reduced MI size compared to placebo, Pim1+ cells produced a ~3-fold greater decrease in scar mass at 8 weeks post-injection compared to hCSCs (−29.2 ± 2.7% vs. −8.4 ± 0.7%; p < 0.003). Pim1+ hCSCs also produced a 2-fold increase of viable mass compared to hCSCs at 8 weeks (113.7 ± 7.2% vs. 65.6 ± 6.8%; p < 0.003), and a greater increase in regional contractility in both infarct and border zones (both p < 0.05). Both CSC types significantly increased ejection fraction at 4 weeks but this was only sustained in the Pim1+ group at 8 weeks compared to placebo. Both hCSC and Pim1+ hCSC treatment reduced afterload (p=0.02 and p=0.004, respectively). Mechanoenergetic recoupling was significantly greater in the Pim1+ hCSC group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Pim1 overexpression enhanced the effect of intramyocardial delivery of CSCs to infarcted porcine hearts. These findings provide a rationale for genetic modification of stem cells and consequent translation to clinical trials.

The mechanism by which stem cell-based therapy improves heart function is still unknown, but paracrine mechanisms seem to be involved. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) secrete several factors, including insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which may contribute to myocardial regeneration. Our aim was to investigate whether the overexpression of IGF-1 in ADSCs (IGF-1-ADSCs) improves treatment of chronically infarcted rat hearts. ADSCs were transduced with a lentiviral vector to induce IGF-1 overexpression. IGF-1-ADSCs transcribe100-to 200-fold more IGF-1 mRNA levels compared to nontransduced ADSCs. IGF-1 transduction did not alter ADSC immunophenotypic characteristics even under hypoxic conditions. However, IGF-1-ADSCs proliferate at higher rates and release greater amounts of growth factors such as IGF-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Importantly, IGF-1 secreted by IGF-1-ADSCs is functional given that Akt-1 phosphorylation was remarkably induced in neonatal cardiomyocytes cocultured with IGF-1-ADSCs, and this increase was prevented with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor treatment. Next, we tested IGF-1-ADSCs in a rat myocardial infarction (MI) model. MI was performed by coronary ligation, and 4 weeks after MI, animals received intramyocardial injections of either ADSCs (n = 7), IGF-1-ADSCs (n = 7), or vehicle (n = 7) into the infarcted border zone. Left ventricular function was evaluated by echocardiography before and after 6 weeks of treatment, and left ventricular hemodynamics were assessed 7 weeks after cell injection. Notably, IGF-1-ADSCs improved left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac contractility index, but did not reduce scar size when compared to the ADSC-treated group. In summary, transplantation of ADSCs transduced with IGF-1 is a superior therapeutic approach to treat MI compared to nontransduced ADSCs, suggesting that gene and cell therapy may bring additional benefits to the treatment of MI.

Therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are lacking. Growth hormone-releasing hormone agonists (GHRH-As) have salutary effects in ischemic and nonischemic heart failure animal models. Accordingly, we hypothesized that GHRH-A treatment ameliorates chronic kidney disease (CKD)-induced HFpEF in a large-animal model. Female Yorkshire pigs (n = 16) underwent 5/6 nephrectomy via renal artery embolization and 12 wk later were randomized to receive daily subcutaneous injections of GHRH-A (MR-409; n = 8; 30 µg/kg) or placebo (n = 8) for 4 to 6 wk. Renal and cardiac structure and function were serially assessed postembolization. Animals with 5/6 nephrectomy exhibited CKD (elevated blood urea nitrogen [BUN] and creatinine) and faithfully recapitulated the hemodynamic features of HFpEF. HFpEF was demonstrated at 12 wk by maintenance of ejection fraction associated with increased left ventricular mass, relative wall thickness, end-diastolic pressure (EDP), end-diastolic pressure/end-diastolic volume (EDP/EDV) ratio, and tau, the time constant of isovolumic diastolic relaxation. After 4 to 6 wk of treatment, the GHRH-A group exhibited normalization of EDP (P = 0.03), reduced EDP/EDV ratio (P = 0.018), and a reduction in myocardial pro-brain natriuretic peptide protein abundance. GHRH-A increased cardiomyocyte [Ca2+] transient amplitude (P = 0.009). Improvement of the diastolic function was also evidenced by increased abundance of titin isoforms and their ratio (P = 0.0022). GHRH-A exerted a beneficial effect on diastolic function in a CKD large-animal model as demonstrated by improving hemodynamic, structural, and molecular characteristics of HFpEF. These findings have important therapeutic implications for the HFpEF syndrome.

BackgroundGrowth hormone–releasing hormone agonists (GHRH‐As) stimulate cardiac repair following myocardial infarction (MI) in rats through the activation of the GHRH signaling pathway within the heart. We tested the hypothesis that the administration of GHRH‐As prevents ventricular remodeling in a swine subacute MI model.Methods and ResultsTwelve female Yorkshire swine (25 to 30 kg) underwent transient occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (MI). Two weeks post MI, swine were randomized to receive injections of either 30 μg/kg GHRH‐A (MR‐409) (GHRH‐A group; n=6) or vehicle (placebo group; n=6). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and pressure–volume loops were obtained at multiple time points. Infarct, border, and remote (noninfarcted) zones were assessed for GHRH receptor by immunohistochemistry. Four weeks of GHRH‐A treatment resulted in reduced scar mass (GHRH‐A: −21.9±6.42%; P=0.02; placebo: 10.9±5.88%; P=0.25; 2‐way ANOVA; P=0.003), and scar size (percentage of left ventricular mass) (GHRH‐A: −38.38±4.63; P=0.0002; placebo: −14.56±6.92; P=0.16; 2‐way ANOVA; P=0.02). This was accompanied by improved diastolic strain. Unlike in rats, this reduced infarct size in swine was not accompanied by improved cardiac function as measured by serial hemodynamic pressure–volume analysis. GHRH receptors were abundant in cardiac tissue, with a greater density in the border zone of the GHRH‐A group compared with the placebo group.ConclusionsDaily subcutaneous administration of GHRH‐A is feasible and safe in a large animal model of subacute ischemic cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, GHRH‐A therapy significantly reduced infarct size and improved diastolic strain, suggesting a local activation of the GHRH pathway leading to the reparative process.