VegT and beta-Catenin are key players in the hierarchy of factors that are required for induction and patterning of mesendoderm in Xenopus embryogenesis. By descending the genetic cascades, cells lose their pluripotent status and are determined to differentiate into distinct tissues. Mammalian Oct-3/4, a POU factor of subclass V (POU-V), is required for the maintenance of pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. However, its molecular function within the early embryo is yet poorly understood. We here show that the two maternal Xenopus POU-V factors, Oct-60 and Oct-25, inhibit transcription of genes activated by VegT and beta-Catenin. Maternal POU-V factors and maternal VegT show an opposite distribution along the animal/vegetal axis. Oct-25, VegT and Tcf3 interact with each other and form repression complexes on promoters of VegT and beta-Catenin target genes. We suggest that POU-V factors antagonize primary inducers to allow germ layer specification in a temporally and spatially coordinated manner.

No abstract

No abstract

The Xvent-2B promoter is regulated by a BMP-2/4-induced transcription complex comprising Smad signal transducers and specific transcription factors. Using a yeast one-hybrid screen we have found that Oct-25, a Xenopus POU domain protein related to mammalian Oct-3/4, binds as an additional factor to the Xvent-2B

The active form of the Xenopus X-box binding protein 1 (xXBP1) partially synergizes and partially antagonizes with BMP-4 signaling. xXBP1 overexpression inhibits mesoderm differentiation and formation of neural tissues. A functional knockdown promotes differentiation of lateral and dorsal mesoderm but not of ventral mesoderm and of neuroectoderm. We show that the active form of xXBP1 in gastrula and early neurula stage embryos is generated by removal of exon 4 and not by an endoribonuclease activity in the endoplasmic reticulum. The N-terminal region of xXBP1 which contains the basic leucine-zipper also contains a nuclear localization signal and both, the N-terminal as well as the C-terminal regions are required for xXBP1 function. The effects of xXBP1 are in part correlated to a regulatory loop between xXBP1 and BMP-4. xXBP1 and BMP-4 stimulate mutually the transcription of each other, but xXBP1 inhibits the BMP-4 target gene, Xvent-2. Both, in vitro and in vivo assays demonstrate that xXBP1 interacts with BMP-4 and Xvent-2B promoters. GST-pulldown assays reveal that xXBP1 can interact with c-Jun, the transcriptional co-activator p300 and with the BMP-4 responsive Smad1. On the other hand, xXBP1 also binds to the inhibitory Smads, Smad6 and Smad7, that can act as transcriptional co-repressors. Based on these data, we conclude that xXBP1 might function as an inhibitor of mesodermal and neural tissue formation by acting either as transcriptional activator or as repressor. This dual activity depends upon binding of co-factors being involved in the formation of distinct transcription complexes.

No abstract

Development and patterning of neural tissue in the vertebrate embryo involves a set of molecules and processes whose relationships are not fully understood. Classical embryology revealed a remarkable phenomenon known as vertical signalling, a gastrulation stage mechanism that copies anterior-posterior positional information from mesoderm to prospective neural tissue. Vertical signalling mediates unambiguous copying of complex information from one tissue layer to another. In this study, we report an investigation of this process in recombinates of mesoderm and ectoderm from gastrulae of Xenopus laevis. Our results show that copying of positional information involves non cell autonomous autoregulation of particular Hox genes whose expression is copied from mesoderm to neurectoderm in the gastrula. Furthermore, this information sharing mechanism involves unconventional translocation of the homeoproteins themselves. This conserved primitive mechanism has been known for three decades but has only recently been put into any developmental context. It provides a simple, robust way to pattern the neurectoderm using the Hox pattern already present in the mesoderm during gastrulation. We suggest that this mechanism was selected during evolution to enable unambiguous copying of rather complex information from cell to cell and that it is a key part of the original ancestral mechanism mediating axial patterning by the highly conserved Hox genes.

Using RT-PCR and in situ hybridisation, we have analysed the temporal and spatial expression patterns of Xenopus Fox genes of subclass N. By screening cDNA libraries and by RT-PCR using embryonic RNA and primers derived from EST analyses, we could isolate FoxN2, FoxN4, FoxN5 and different isoforms of FoxN3. FoxN2 and FoxN3 transcripts were found during all developmental stages including early cleavage and tailbud stages. FoxN5 transcripts were only present at early cleavage stages, while FoxN4 expression began after midblastula transition. Spatial expression of FoxN2 was first detected in the early eye field and later, in the branchial arches, the vagal ganglion and in the developing retina. FoxN3 transcripts were found within the animal cap. In post-gastrula embryos, neural crest cells and the early eye field showed strong expression of FoxN3. At late tadpole stages, the branchial arches were stained. FoxN4 was expressed in the early eye field and later in the developing retina cells, the nephrostomes of the pronephric kidney and in the midbrain. A ubiquitous expression of FoxN5 was found in early cleavage stage embryos. KEY WORDS: X. laevis, FoxN transcription factor, eye anlage, nephrostome, branchial archForkhead box (Fox) transcription factors are involved in a variety of biological processes, such as cell proliferation, maintenance of pluripotency and cellular differentiation. According to conserved amino acid positions within the DNA binding winged-helix domain, they are divided into subclasses (FoxA -FoxS) (Kaestner et al., 2000). Subclass N gained special interest, because Foxn1 (whn) was found to be mutated in nude mice lacking immune defence (Nehls et al., 1994). Foxn1 knockout in mice results in downregulation of hair keratins, athymia and abnormal morphogenesis of the epidermis and hair follicles. Furthermore, Foxn1 is a downstream target of the Wnt pathway (Balciunaite et al., 2002). FOXN2/HTLF (Human T-cell Leukemia Factor) was identified in search of transcription factors binding the LTR of the human T-cell leukemia virus (Li et al., 1992). FOXN3/CHES1 (checkpoint suppressor 1) suppresses the lethality, UV sensitivity and a G2 checkpoint defect of a mec1 null mutation in yeast and plays an essential role in cell cycle regulation (Pati et al., 1997;Scott et al., 2003). It was found to be downregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) (Chang et al., 2005). Foxn4 is expressed in the retina (Gouge et al., 2001). A knockout analysis in mice revealed that Foxn4 is involved in the development of amacrine and horizontal cells during retinogenesis. The retinogenic factors Math3, NeuroD1 and Prox1 have been identified as putative downstream targets (Li et al., 2004). FOXN5/R1, FOXN6/R2 and Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50: 429-434 (2006) doi: 10.1387/ijdb.052126ms their homologues in the rat and the mouse were identified in silico. It is known that human FOXN6 RNA is expressed in breast cancer cell lines and primary breast cancer (Katoh and Katoh, 2004a;2004b).While the information on mammalian Fox...