These results expand earlier reports showing that helmets provide protection for all types and locations of head injuries, and show that they are not associated with increased neck injury occurrence.
To evaluate helmet use in California before and after the introduction of an unrestricted helmet use law on January 1, 1992, observations of motorcycles and their riders were made at 60 locations in seven California counties, twice before and four times after the law was introduced. Helmet use increased from about 50% in 1991 to more than 99% throughout 1992. Compliance was achieved despite variations in helmet use by motorcycle design and road type. Seven percent of riders used nonstandard helmets after the law. With adequate enforcement, unrestricted helmet use laws can achieve almost 100% compliance and reduce the number of people riding motorcycles.
Three national US agencies report on work-related fatal injuries, and one uses the "injury at work" designation on the death certificate to identify and characterize these fatalities. The accuracy of the "injury at work" notation has not been validated. The authors used selected external causes of death (from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) that are highly likely to be work-related or not work-related as a standard to compare with the California death certificate "at work" designation for the years 1979-1989. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics for the years 1979-1984 were used to measure prevalence for purposes of determining the predictive value of a positive or negative work-related notation on the death certificate. The sensitivity of the "at work" designation was 77.6%, with a specificity of over 99%. Sensitivity but not specificity varied by age, sex, and specific external cause of death. The predictive value positive of the "at work" designation was about 60%, which suggests caution in using it for some epidemiologic purposes.
Although the traumatic injury death rate in the United States decreased during the last 20 years, the percent of all injury deaths attributable to brain injuries has remained steady. Head injuries are a leading cause of injury among motorcycle riders in crashes, and the helmet is an effective measure to reduce these injuries. To reduce the burden and cost of motorcycle injuries, many states have increased helmet use by introducing mandatory helmet legislation. This report presents evidence on the effects of the motorcycle helmet and helmet use legislation--two interrelated prevention strategies which decrease traumatic brain injury among motorcycle riders. Nonfatally injured motorcyclists were included if they crashed between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1993 and were treated in one of 18 hospitals in 10 California counties. Medical records for all injured motorcyclists admitted to these 18 hospitals and those treated in the emergency department and released in eight of these hospitals were individually reviewed. Complete lists of injury diagnoses for each rider were coded according to the 1990 Abbreviated Injury Severity Scale by trained clinical staff. Before the universal helmet law was introduced (when only a third of injured riders wore helmets) 38.2% of riders sustained head injuries. When helmet use increased to over 85% of injured riders following the law, less than 25% of riders sustained head injuries. Both the severity and the number of head injuries per individual rider decreased after the mandatory helmet use law led to increased helmet use. Riders wearing helmets suffered fewer skull fractures, fewer intracranial injuries, had less frequent and shorter periods of loss of consciousness, more favorable GCS scores, and shorter hospital stays. Mandatory motorcycle helmet use laws are an effective mechanism to increase helmet use among riders and thus prevent head and brain injuries resulting from motorcycle crashes.
Study objective. To determine the effect of immediate resuscitative efforts on the neurological outcome of children with submersion injury.
Design. A case-control study was designed to determine if immediate resuscitation by rescuers or bystanders reduces the frequency of severe neurological damage or death in children with a documented submersion event. Logistic regression was used calculate an adjusted odds ratio.
Participants. The study group consisted of 166 children, aged zero to 14 years, having a submersion event during May 1984 through August 1992, and admitted through various emergency departments to Huntington Memorial Hospital in Pasadena, California.
Measurements and main results. All study subjects had an observed and documented episode of apnea at the time of submersion. Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of neurological impairment or death. Exposure was verified from historical accounts of postsubmersion events provided by family, friends, and/or paramedical personnel. The study factors included age and gender, duration of submersion, hypothermia, presence of apnea, resuscitative efforts, and clinical outcome. Children with a good outcome were 4.75 (adjusted odds ratio (OR)) times more likely to have a history of immediate resuscitation than children with poor outcome (95% confidence interval: 3.44 < OR < 6.06, P = .0001). Various types of resuscitative efforts and potential confounding factors were also evaluated. CPR and mouth-to-mouth resuscitation were the most effective types for the prevention of death or severe anoxic encephalopathy.
Conclusion. Immediate resuscitation before the arrival of paramedical personnel is associated with a significantly better neurological outcome in children with submersion injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.