Background: Drains are used in plastic surgery to remove excess fluid while ameliorating complications. However, there is a paucity of evidence supporting guiding parameters on when to discontinue a drain. The aim of our study was to determine whether two of the most common parameters, drain volume 24 hours before removal or postoperative day, are valid indicators for drain removal. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for surgical operations performed by our division between July 2014 and May 2019. Of the 1308 patients, 616 had a drain and a complete record. Demographics, medical history, operative time, antibiotic use, anatomic site, donor/recipient, and complication type were recorded. Complications were defined as events that deviated from expected postoperative course or required pharmacological/procedural intervention. T -test and Chi square were used to analyze data. Results: In total, 544 patients were in the no complication group, and 72 were in the complication group. The complication group patients had drains removed later than patients in the no complication group (15.7 days versus 12.5 days, P = 0.0003) and had similar final 24-hour drain volumes versus patients in the no complication group (16.7 mL versus 18.8 mL, P = 0.2548). The complication group had more operations on the pelvis (11% versus 2.1%; P = 0.000017) or thigh (8.5% versus 3.4%; P = 0.029). Conclusions: Our data suggest neither postoperative day nor 24-hour volume before drain removal are valid indicators for removal. Late removal correlates with more complications; however, persisting output leading to later removal may be predictive of an impending complication rather than delays in drain removal causing the complication.

No abstract

Background: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury carries significant morbidity. Microsurgical repair of the RLN has proven promising for enhancing patient recovery of vocal function; however, data remains limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent RLN repair from 2007 to 2022. Demographics and medical history were collected. The location and etiology of RLN injury, as well as the repair technique, were collected. Follow-up data was collected at the initial post-operative visit, at six months, and at one year. Hoarseness was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Of patients who underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) following repair, the glottic gap was measured. Vocal interventions performed were also recorded. This study utilized descriptive statistical methods. Results: Eleven patients underwent RLN repair. All patients underwent immediate repair. Fifty-four percent (N=6) of RLN injuries resulted from tumor inflammation or nerve encasament. Eighty-two percent (N=9) underwent direct RLN coaptation, 9% (N=1) underwent vagus-RLN anastomosis, and 9% (N=1) underwent an interposition nerve graft. Technical success was 100%. Seventy-three percent (N=8) required otolaryngology referral, and of those, 50% (N = 4) required intervention. At initial evaluation, 91% (N=10) suffered from mild to severe hoarseness, and of patients who underwent NPL, all had a glottic gap. At one year, 82% of patients (N=9) improved to having mild to no appreciable hoarseness. Of the patients who underwent NPL, 62% (N=5) had closure of the glottic gap. Conclusion: Patients undergoing repair of the RLN following injury showed excellent recovery of vocal function and resolution of glottic gap at one year

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background End-to-side nerve transfer (ETSNT) for treatment of peripheral nerve injuries is controversial given the myriad anatomic locations, injury types, and indications. Efficacy of ETSNT remains debated. We hypothesized differences in age, sex, transfer location, and time to surgery influence outcomes. Methods We performed a search of the PubMed database for ETSNT in the upper extremity from 1988 to 2018. Age, sex, transfer location, time to surgery, donor and recipient axons, and strength and sensation outcomes as measured by Medical Research Council scale were extracted from articles. Meaningful recovery was classified as Medical Research Council Grade 3 or greater. Association between meaningful recovery and younger (<25) and older (≥25) patients, injury mechanism, sex, transfer location, donor axons, and recipient axons were calculated using a χ2 or Fisher exact test. A logistic mixed effect model was used with time to surgery, age (categorical), transfer location, and injury type as a fixed effect, and a random paper effect was included to account for correlation among patients from the same paper. Results One hundred fifteen patients from 11 studies were included. Neither age (continuous variable, P = 0.68) nor time to surgery (P = 0.28) affected meaningful recovery. Injury mechanism, sex, and younger age (<25 vs ≥25 years) were not associated with meaningful recovery. Within the brachial plexus ETSNT demonstrated median M4 ± 1 postoperative strength, with trunks/cords as the primary axon donor (P = 0.03). The musculocutaneous nerve demonstrated promising but variable results in 31 patients with median strength M3 ± 4. Digital nerves consistently demonstrated meaningful sensory recovery as both donor and recipient axons (15 of 15, 100%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that odds of meaningful recovery after ETSNT are significantly greater for transfers within the brachial plexus compared with the distal arm (odds ratio, 41.9; 95% CI, 1.1–1586.7, P = 0.04), but location does not significantly affect meaningful recovery (P = 0.22). Conclusions Patients undergoing ETSNT for digital nerve injury demonstrated meaningful recovery. End-to-side nerve transfer seems to be more efficacious when performed within the brachial plexus. This study did not find sex, injury mechanism, or time to surgery to significantly affect meaningful recovery. Additional study is needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of ETSNT in the upper extremity.

No abstract