Final 24-hour Drain Output and Postoperative Day Are Poor Indicators for Appropriate Drain Removal

Abstract

Background: Drains are used in plastic surgery to remove excess fluid while ameliorating complications. However, there is a paucity of evidence supporting guiding parameters on when to discontinue a drain. The aim of our study was to determine whether two of the most common parameters, drain volume 24 hours before removal or postoperative day, are valid indicators for drain removal. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for surgical operations performed by our division between July 2014 and May 2019. Of the 1308 patients, 616 had a drain and a complete record. Demographics, medical history, operative time, antibiotic use, anatomic site, donor/recipient, and complication type were recorded. Complications were defined as events that deviated from expected postoperative course or required pharmacological/procedural intervention. T -test and Chi square were used to analyze data. Results: In total, 544 patients were in the no complication group, and 72 were in the complication group. The complication group patients had drains removed later than patients in the no complication group (15.7 days versus 12.5 days, P = 0.0003) and had similar final 24-hour drain volumes versus patients in the no complication group (16.7 mL versus 18.8 mL, P = 0.2548). The complication group had more operations on the pelvis (11% versus 2.1%; P = 0.000017) or thigh (8.5% versus 3.4%; P = 0.029). Conclusions: Our data suggest neither postoperative day nor 24-hour volume before drain removal are valid indicators for removal. Late removal correlates with more complications; however, persisting output leading to later removal may be predictive of an impending complication rather than delays in drain removal causing the complication.

Perceptions of Surgical Drains Among Breast Reconstruction Patients and Health Care Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study

“…Surgical drains are utilized by a majority of plastic surgeons in breast reconstruction, having been previously demonstrated to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications including seroma. 1,2 However, there are also established drawbacks to the usage of surgical drains, including concerns surrounding maintenance of surgical drains and patient satisfaction. Surgical drains after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions can delay patient discharge, increase post-operative pain, and also require daily care.…”