The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness of scalp cooling in preventing alopecia for patients with breast cancer who received the trial combination chemotherapy of Epirubicin and Docetaxel. Doubt remains about the general effectiveness of scalp cooling in preventing hair loss for patients receiving chemotherapy. There is very little information available about its specific effectiveness with combinations of Taxanes and Anthracycline drugs. Of the 40 patients who received this drug combination, 10 were included in a pilot study whereas the remaining 30 constituted the main study sample. A randomized controlled study was undertaken whereby the intervention group received scalp cooling via gel cool caps and the control group received no specific preventative intervention. Nurses assessed participants' hair loss using a modified version of the WHO scale at seven time points and also recorded hair loss photographically. Two independent experts rated the photographs using the same scale. Patients self-reported in relation to overall hair loss, hair condition, levels of emotional upset, negativity about appearance, hair re-growth and wig use. Significantly greater hair loss was apparent in the control group during most of the treatment period. However, the level of protection afforded by the cool caps was relatively poor with this chemotherapy combination. The marginal benefits of scalp cooling in this context must be clearly explained to patients.
The Patient-generated Index (PGI) is a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure which asks respondents to nominate the areas of their lives which are most affected by their health condition, so that they can then rate the severity of the effects and weight their relative importance. It is unusual amongst such measures in that it is designed for postal administration. This study assessed the ability of the revised PGI to measure change in HRQoL in a population of 161 people who had previously been identified as having limiting long-term illness. A questionnaire, including a revised version of the PGI and the developmental version of the SF-36, was mailed at two time points (T1 and T2), 4.5 months apart. The PGI was subsequently assessed in terms of practicality, validity, reliability and responsiveness. At T1, 62% of those who felt that they still had a health problem affecting their life completed the PGI correctly. These people were significantly younger and had spent longer in education than the remaining 38%. Only 19 respondents completed the PGI correctly on both occasions, rendering reliability and responsiveness testing inconclusive. The value of the PGI is significantly diminished by the fact that many people cannot complete it correctly. Future development of the instrument is appraised in the context of related measurement methods.
Within health services research the quest for better ways of measuring quality of life as an outcome variable continues apace. Recent developments in this area have seen increasing attempts to incorporate individually generated content and values into quality of life measures while retaining valid psychometric measurement properties. Following a brief overview of current conceptual approaches to quality of life measurement, this paper reviews the development of two leading Respondent-generated instruments: the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) and the Patient Generated Index (PGI). The relative strengths and weaknesses of these tools and their potential applications for nursing and nursing research are appraised. These measures both address and manifest a number of fundamental conceptual and methodological problems, and represent an innovative attempt to square the quantitative--qualitative circle. As such they offer challenging opportunities for nursing at a number of levels. Their elicitation and quantification of individual components of quality of life offer opportunities for nurses to plan care and goal set with patients. As yet, however, the validity, reliability, responsiveness and practicality of these instruments as outcome measures are debatable and require further testing. Nurse researchers could contribute to this process by using Respondent-generated measures as an adjunct to existing, established tools in outcome studies. Moreover, nursing is well placed to investigate and debate the validity of the conceptual assumptions underpinning these new instruments.
Background: Cancer is a primary source of concern in Thailand and other countries around the world, including the Asian-Pacific region. Evidence supports that an important contributing cause of cancer and other chronic illnesses such as stroke, diabetes, and hypertension is excessive alcohol consumption. Studies conducted in Thailand reveal a worrisome rise in the number of new and regular drinkers in communities. Therefore, actions for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of problem drinking are necessary. In recent years nurses in North East Thailand have been developing and implementing the Khon Kaen Family Health Nursing model to embed disease prevention in communities through the actions of family health nurses and local family health leaders. Aim: The aim of this qualitative research was to better understand the experiences of the local family health leaders using this model and to synthesize lessons learned. Materials and Methods: As part of a participatory action research approach involving analysis of focus group discussions and individual interviews, the experiences of 45 family health leaders were synthesized. Results: Four main themes were identified, namely: i) Family first: role modeling beginning at the personal and family level. ii) Local leverage: using village community forums to reduce alcohol drinking. iii) Gentle growth: making the first step and treading gently; and iv) Respect, Redemption, Rehabilitation: valuing the person to re-integrate them in the village society. Conclusions: As alcohol consumption in the village declined significantly following the prevention program, these findings illuminate how low-tech integrated prevention approaches may be very useful, particularly in rural communities. The lessons learned may have relevance not only in Thailand but in other countries seeking to prevent and mitigate behavior that conduces to diseases such as cancer.
2014) Visualizing the invisible: applying an arts-based methodology to explore how healthcare workers and patient representatives envisage pathogens in the context of healthcare associated infections, Arts Background: While efforts to enhance healthcare workers' knowledge and behaviours in the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) have been considerable, little is known about how staff visualize pathogens and their relationship to HAIs. This study, therefore, sought to explore how healthcare workers envisage pathogens in the context of HAIs. Method: Ten hospital-based healthcare workers and two patient representatives participated in a workshop combining risk identification, making activities and in-depth interviews. This methodology was informed by Sullivan's Dimensions of Visualization framework. A descriptive cross-case analysis approach was used to summarize and synthesize the data. Results: Few of the participants reported actively visualizing pathogens in their mind's eye; however, the study elicited mental images of pathogens from all participants and all were able to create related models during the making activity. Conceptions appeared to be influenced primarily by microbiology and infection control campaigns. Conclusion: Our adaptation of Sullivan's Dimensions of Visualization framework proved useful in structuring this initial enquiry and merits wider application and evaluation by qualitative health researchers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.