Stormwater control measures (SCMs) are designed to mitigate deleterious effects of urbanization on river networks, but our ability to predict the cumulative effect of multiple SCMs at watershed scales is limited. The most widely used metric to quantify impacts of urban development, total imperviousness (TI), does not contain information about the extent of stormwater control. We analyzed the discharge records of 16 urban watersheds in Charlotte, NC spanning a range of TI (4.1 to 54%) and area mitigated with SCMs (1.3 to 89%). We then tested multiple watershed metrics that quantify the degree of urban impact and SCM mitigation to determine which best predicted hydrologic response across sites. At the event time scale, linear models showed TI to be the best predictor of both peak unit discharge and rainfall-runoff ratios across a range of storm sizes. TI was also a strong driver of both a watershed's capacity to buffer small (e.g., 1-10 mm) rain events, and the relationship between peak discharge and precipitation once that buffering
Insights into the effects of stormwater control measures (SCMs) on urban stream hydrology and in-stream processes are required to understand their effectiveness in mitigating the environmental problems associated with urbanization. Stable water isotopes were applied to understand processes occurring within SCMs and their effects on water sourcing in urban streams. We sampled ten events from June to November 2013 at four locations along a 360-m headwater stream reach in North Carolina and at four SCMs (two ponds, one wetland and one bioretention) that contribute to the reach. We used streamflow upstream of the SCMaffected reach and outflow from an intensively sampled retention pond as endmembers to quantify contributions of this pond's outflow to streamflow. Synchronous sampling revealed that SCM outflows have different isotopic signatures, likely a function of evaporation and mixing within the storage volume of each SCM. The SCMs also have distinctive isotopic signatures relative to the receiving stream. The isotopic signature of discharge from the intensively sampled pond reveals varying residence times (hours to weeks) within the structure. At sampled timepoints during ten events, this pond, which drains 25% of the watershed's impervious area, contributed an average of 10% (0-21%) of the streamflow on the rising limb and 12% (0-19%) of discharge at peak flow. During recession, this pond contributed an average of 32% (11-54%) of the stream's discharge, reflecting the SCM's design goals of temporarily storing and delaying run-off, mitigating the effects of impervious surface on peak flows. Based on this study, isotopes appear to be a robust tool for examining stormwater-stream dynamics.Where values are not provided, uncertainty bands spanned 0-100%. Negative values occur when the stream sample was outside the range of the end members 5302 A. J. JEFFERSON ET AL.
Urban-use pesticides
are of increasing concern as they are widely
used and have been linked to toxicity of aquatic organisms. To assess
the occurrence and treatment of these pesticides in stormwater runoff,
an approach combining field sampling and watershed-scale modeling
was employed. Stormwater samples were collected at four locations
in the lower San Diego River watershed during a storm event and analyzed
for fipronil, three of its degradation products, and eight pyrethroids.
All 12 compounds were detected with frequency ranging from 50 to 100%.
Field results indicate pesticide pollution is ubiquitous at levels
above toxicity benchmarks and that runoff may be a major pollutant
source to urban surface waters. A watershed-scale stormwater model
was developed, calibrated using collected data, and evaluated for
pesticide storm load and concentrations under several management scenarios.
Modeling results show that enhanced stormwater control measures, such
as biochar-amended biofilters, reduce both pesticide storm load and
toxicity benchmark exceedances, while conventional biofilters reduce
the storm load but provide minimal toxicity benchmark exceedance reduction.
Consequently, biochar amendment has the potential to broadly improve
water quality at the watershed scale, particularly when meeting concentration-based
metrics such as toxicity benchmarks. This research motivates future
work to demonstrate the reliability of full-scale enhanced stormwater
control measures to treat pollutants of emerging concern.
Urban development of watersheds increases runoff and nitrogen loads by adding urban impervious surfaces and increasing the hydrologic connectivity of these surfaces to streams. Storm water control measures (SCMs) are designed to disrupt this connectivity by retaining water in biologically active depressions where nitrogen retention, transformation, and removal occur. This work applies a mechanistic, spatially distributed, hydroecological model (RHESSys) to a suburban watershed in Charlotte, NC, with 15% total imperviousness (TI) and 33% watershed area mitigated by SCMs. We developed emergent relationships between watershed‐scale predictors (TI and connectivity to SCMs) and water and nitrogen response variables (storm water runoff ratios and nitrogen load by species). Results showed that annual runoff ratios were insensitive to increases in connectivity to SCMs (varying by ~1% of rainfall) because SCMs did not substantially increase evaporation but that runoff ratios increased by an average 0.2% per 1% increase in TI due to decreases in transpiration in the watershed. Generally, nitrate loads increased with TI but decreased as more surfaces were mitigated by SCMs. However, these nitrate reductions corresponded to increased export of dissolved organic nitrogen and ammonium. Together, these results indicate that SCMs act as both removers and transformers of nitrogen at the watershed scale. SCMs showed a net assimilation of nitrogen in warm months and net release in cool months, which offset the timing of nitrogen export relative to inputs. This work highlights that using a hydroecological, process‐based model reveals both the emergent relationships between watershed condition and response and the processes controlling those relationships.
Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to reduce microbial pollution in runoff, but their removal efficiencies differ. Enhanced BMPs, such as those with media amendments, can increase removal of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in runoff from 0.25-log to above 3-log; however, their implications for watershed-scale management are poorly understood. In this work, a computational model was developed to simulate watershed-scale bacteria loading and BMP performance using the Ballona Creek Watershed (Los Angeles County, CA) as a case study. Over 1400 scenarios with varying BMP performance, percent watershed area treated, BMP treatment volume, and infiltrative capabilities were simulated. Incremental improvement of BMP performance by 0.25-log, while keeping other scenario variables constant, reduces annual bacterial load at the outlet by a range of 0-29%. In addition, various simulated scenarios provide the same FIB load reduction; for example, 75% load reduction is achieved by diverting runoff from either 95% of the watershed area to 25 000 infiltrating BMPs with 0.5-log removal or 75% of the watershed area to 75 000 infiltrating BMPs with 1.5-log removal. Lastly, simulated infiltrating BMPs provide greater FIB reduction than noninfiltrating BMPs at the watershed scale. Results provide new insight on the trade-offs between BMP treatment volume, performance, and distribution.
This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.