Background
Gram-negative bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Data to guide the duration of antibiotic therapy are limited.
Methods
This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial. Inpatients with gram-negative bacteremia, who were afebrile and hemodynamically stable for at least 48 hours, were randomized to receive 7 days (intervention) or 14 days (control) of covering antibiotic therapy. Patients with uncontrolled focus of infection were excluded. The primary outcome at 90 days was a composite of all-cause mortality; relapse, suppurative, or distant complications; and readmission or extended hospitalization (>14 days). The noninferiority margin was set at 10%.
Results
We included 604 patients (306 intervention, 298 control) between January 2013 and August 2017 in 3 centers in Israel and Italy. The source of the infection was urinary in 411 of 604 patients (68%); causative pathogens were mainly Enterobacteriaceae (543/604 [90%]). A 7-day difference in the median duration of covering antibiotics was achieved. The primary outcome occurred in 140 of 306 patients (45.8%) in the 7-day group vs 144 of 298 (48.3%) in the 14-day group (risk difference, –2.6% [95% confidence interval, –10.5% to 5.3%]). No significant differences were observed in all other outcomes and adverse events, except for a shorter time to return to baseline functional status in the short-course therapy arm.
Conclusions
In patients hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia achieving clinical stability before day 7, an antibiotic course of 7 days was noninferior to 14 days. Reducing antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia to 7 days is an important antibiotic stewardship intervention.
Clinical Trials Registration
NCT01737320.
Preterm neonates had the highest rates of LOD and mortality. Most mothers carried GBS at the time of the LOD diagnosis, whereas 6% had mastitis. Intrapartum antibiotics were associated both with delayed presentation of symptoms and milder LOD.
Newborns exposed to IAP and GBS-free at hospital discharge subsequently acquire GBS from their mothers. Culture-positive milk is associated with heavy neonatal colonization.
This cohort describes the very common and complex nature of infectious complications in this challenging group of transplantation patients. Larger cohorts are needed to specifically address infection risk factors and longer term outcomes.
The epidemiological and antifungal susceptibility data for 94 episodes of candidaemia in an Italian tertiary-care hospital between January 2000 and August 2003 were evaluated by prospective laboratory-based surveillance. The incidence of fungaemia was 0.90 episodes/10 000 patient-days, and the most common species isolated were Candida albicans (40.4%), Candida parapsilosis (22.3%), Candida tropicalis (16.0%) and Candida glabrata (12.8%). Among 24 patients who received antifungal prophylaxis, non-albicans Candida spp. were more prevalent than C. albicans (p 0.012). The 30-day mortality rate was high (38.2%), particularly for haematological (71.4%) and solid-organ transplant patients (50.0%), and in individuals with C. tropicalis and C. glabrata bloodstream infections (60.0% and 50.0%, respectively). In-vitro susceptibility tests demonstrated that 95% of the isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B (MIC < 2 mg/L), 98.1% to posaconazole (MIC < 1 mg/L), 95.8% to flucytosine (MIC < 32 mg/L) and fluconazole (MIC < 64 mg/L), and 94.7% to itraconazole (MIC < 1 mg/L). Posaconazole was active (MIC 0.5 mg/L) against all three isolates of Candida krusei, which had reduced susceptibility to both fluconazole and itraconazole. Overall, non-albicans Candida spp. accounted for 60% of the episodes of candidaemia, which could be related to the use of antifungal prophylaxis. Resistance is still uncommon in Candida spp. recovered from blood cultures. The in-vitro activity of posaconazole is encouraging, and this agent could play an important role in the management of invasive candidiasis, including episodes caused by inherently less susceptible species such as C. krusei.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.