In the United States, low-income immigrant groups experience greater health disparities and worse health-related outcomes than Whites, including but not limited to higher rates of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The prevention and adequate management of T2DM are, to a great extent, contingent on access to healthy food environments. This exploratory study examines "upstream" antecedent factors contributing to "downstream" health disparities, with a focus on disparities in the structural sources of T2DM risk, especially food environments. Our target group is Latino immigrants receiving services from a non-profit organization (NGO) in Northern California. Methods are mixed and data include focus groups and surveys of our target group, interviews to NGO staff members, and estimation of the thrifty food market basket in local grocery stores. We find that while participants identify T2DM as the greatest health problem in the community, access to healthy foods is severely restricted, geographically, culturally, and economically, with 100% of participants relying on formal or informal food assistance and local food stores offering limited variety of healthy foods and at unaffordable prices. While this article is empirical, its goal is primarily conceptual--to integrate empirical findings with the growing literature underscoring the sociopolitical context of the social determinants of health in general and of T2DM disparities in particular. We propose that interventions to reduce T2DM and comparable health disparities must incorporate a social justice perspective that guarantees a right to adequate food and other health-relevant environments, and concomitantly, a right to health.
Paramedics, health care workers who assess and manage health concerns in the prehospital setting, are increasingly providing psychosocial care in response to a rise in mental health call volume. Observers have construed this fact as “misuse” of paramedic services, and proposed as solutions better triaging of patients, better mental health training of paramedics, and a greater number of community mental health services. In this commentary, we argue that despite the ostensibly well-intentioned nature of these solutions, they shift attention and accountability away from relevant public policies, as well as from broader economic, social, and political determinants of mental health, while placing responsibility on those requiring services or, at best, on the health care system. We also argue that the perspective of paramedics, who are exposed to, and interact with, individuals in their everyday environments, has the potential to inform a better, structural and critical, understanding of the factors driving the rise in psychosocial crises in the first place. Finally, we suggest that a greater engagement with the political and social determinants of mental health would lead to preventing, rather than primarily reacting to, these crises after the fact.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.