Nonstandard abbreviations used: fine-needle aspiration (FNA); follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA); follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC); Hürthle cell adenoma (HCA); serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE); Src-homology 3 (SH3); threshold cycle (Ct).

Nonstandard abbreviations used: fine-needle aspiration (FNA); follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA); follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC); Hürthle cell adenoma (HCA); serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE); Src-homology 3 (SH3); threshold cycle (Ct).

Purpose: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, a standard method for thyroid nodule diagnosis, cannot distinguish between benign follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) and malignant follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). Previously, using expression profiling, we found that a combination of transcript expression levels from DDIT3, ARG2, C1orf24, and ITM1 distinguished between FTA and FTC. The goal of this study was to determine if antibody markers used alone or in combination could accurately distinguish between a wider variety of benign and malignant thyroid lesions in fixed sections and FNA samples. Experimental Design: Immunohistochemistry wasdoneon27FTA, 25FTC,and75otherbenign and malignant thyroid tissue sections using custom antibodies for chromosome 1open reading frame 24 (C1orf24) and integral membrane protein 1 (ITM1) and commercial antibodies for DNA damage^inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3) and arginase II (ARG2). FNA samples were also tested usingthe sameantibodies.RNA expressionwasmeasuredbyquantitative PCRin 33thyroidlesions. Results: C1orf24 and ITM1antibodies had an estimated sensitivity of 1.00 for distinguishing FTA from FTC. For the expanded analysis of all lesions studied, ITM1 had an estimated sensitivity of 1.00 for detecting malignancy. Because all four cancer biomarkers did well, producing overlapping confidence intervals, not one best marker was distinguished. Transcript levels also reliably predicted malignancy, but immunohistochemistry had a higher sensitivity. Malignant cells were easily detected in FNA samples using these markers. Conclusions: Weimprovedthis diagnostic testbyadding C1orf24 and ITM1customantibodies and showing use on a wider variety of thyroid pathology.We recommend that testing of all four cancer biomarkers now be advanced tolarger trials. Use of one or more of these antibodies shouldimprove diagnostic accuracy of suspicious thyroid nodules from both tissue sections and FNA samples.

No abstract

No abstract

RESUMOCom a introdução da ultra-sonografia cervical (USC) no seguimento dos pacientes com carcinoma papilífero de tiróide (CPT), tornou-se freqüente o encontro de pequenos linfonodos (LNs) cervicais. Porém, apesar de a USC apresentar alta sensibilidade, o estudo citológico obtido por punção aspirativa (PAAF) e, nos últimos anos, a dosagem da tiroglobulina (Tg) no lavado da agulha da PAAF (Tg-PAAF) vêm assumindo papel importante no diagnóstico de LNs cervicais. O objetivo deste estudo é verificar a acurácia da combinação da USC, citologia e Tg-PAAF em LNs suspeitos. Estudamos 32 pacientes que apresentavam 44 LNs à USC, classificados como "inflamatórios" (19) ou "suspeitos" (25). Dos 25 LNs suspeitos, 15 apresentavam Tg-PAAF elevada (13 com citologia compatível com metástases e 2 com citologia não-diagnóstica). Esses 15 LNs (11 pacientes) foram confirmados como metástase de CP pelo exame histopatológico. Os 19 LNs "inflamatórios" e os 10/25 LNs "suspeitos" apresentaram citologia negativa e Tg-PAAF indetectável. Concluímos que a USC apresenta alta sensibilidade na detecção de linfonodos cervicais, porém citologia e dosagem de Tg-PAAF são fundamentais para o diagnóstico. A associação USC, citologia e Tg-PAAF pode ser considerada a abordagem mais sensível e específica na detecção de LNs metastáticos em pacientes com CPT. The widespread use of neck ultrasonography (US) during the follow-up of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has led to the discovery of small cervical lymph nodes (LN). Although US has a high sensitivity for diagnosing LN, fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) and measurement of thyroglobulin in fine needle aspirates (FNA-Tg) have proven to be invaluable tools. The aim of this study is to determine the sensitivity of the combined use of neck US, FNA biopsy and FNA-Tg for diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes. We have studied 32 patients with 44 LN detected by US, 19 classified as inflammatory and 25 as suspicious. 15 of those 25 suspicious LN had high FNA-Tg (13 of the 15 had positive cytology and 2 indeterminate). All of these 15 LN (11 patients) were proven to be PTC metastasis by histopathology. All 19 inflammatory LN and those 10/25 suspicious LN, had cytology negative for malignancy and undetectable FNA-Tg. We conclude that fine needle aspiration biopsy and FNA-Tg combined with neck US are essential for detecting positive cervical lymph nodes due to its high sensitivity and specificity and it should be considered the standard for investigating locally recurrent disease in patients with PTC.

Background: There is a concern regarding the use of iodinated contrast agents (ICA) for chest and neck computed tomography (CT) to localize metastatases in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). This is because the iodine in ICA can compete with 131 I and interfere with subsequent whole scans or radioactive iodine treatment. The required period for patients to eliminate the excess iodine is not clear. Therefore, knowing the period for iodine levels to return to baseline after the injection of ICA would permit a more reliable indication of CT for DTC patients. The most widely used marker to assess the plasmatic iodine pool is the urinary iodine (UI) concentration, which can be collected over a period of 24 hours (24U) or as a single-spot urinary sample (sU). As 24U collections are more difficult to perform, sU samples are preferable. It has not been established, however, if the measurement of iodine in sU is accurate for situations of excess iodine. Methods: We evaluated 25 patients with DTC who received ICA to perform chest or neck CT. They collected 24U and sU urinary samples before the CT scan and 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months after the test. UI was quantified by a semiautomated colorimetric method. Results: Baseline median UI levels were 21.8 lg/dL for 24U and 26 lg/dL for sU. One week after ICA, UI median levels were very high for all patients, 800 lg/dL. One month after ICA, however, UI median levels returned to baseline in all patients, 19.0 lg/dL for 24U and 20 lg/dL for sU. Although the values of median UI obtained from sU and 24U samples were signicantly different, we observed a significant correlation between samples collected in 24U and sU in all evaluated periods. Conclusion: One month is required for UI to return to its baseline value after the use of ICA and for patients (after total thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy) to eliminate the excess of iodine. In addition, sU samples, although not statistically similar to 24U values, can be used as a good marker to evaluate patients suspected of contamination with iodine.

This new mRNA Tg quantification is a reliable method that allowed us to differentiate patients free of disease from those with metastases, and it could represent an appropriate molecular marker for the follow-up of patients with DTC, especially those with positive TgAb.