Purpose-To determine (a) changes in the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) for patients using cochlear implants, (b) differences between patients who receive total or partial relief, and (c) identifiable characteristics of those who report tinnitus after implantation.Method-Pre-and postoperatively, 244 adults were administered the THQ when they reported tinnitus.Results-Of the 153 patients who had tinnitus preoperatively, 94 (61%) patients reported total suppression and 59 (39%) reported a partial reduction. In 91 patients who did not have tinnitus before implantation, 11 (12%) reported tinnitus postimplantation. The THQ score decreased from 41% preimplant to 30% postimplant. The largest reductions involved social handicap and hearing. Patients with a more severe hearing loss might be more likely to experience an exacerbation of their tinnitus. We were not able to clearly identify differences between patients who received total or partial relief and the characteristics of patients who reported tinnitus after implantation. Those who acquired tinnitus had the shortest duration hearing loss (5.6 years) and were the oldest (63 years). The average THQ score of patients getting tinnitus was 29%.
Conclusions-Most tinnitus patients benefit from receiving a cochlear implant.© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Contact author: Tao Pan, University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology, 21200 PFP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242-1009. tao-pan@uiowa.edu. Copyright of American Journal of Audiology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
NIH Public Access
Author ManuscriptAm J Audiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 1. (Demajumdar, Stoddart, Donaldson, & Proops, 1999;Di Nardo et al., 2007; Gibson, Aran, & Dauman, 1992;Ito, 1997;Miyamoto, Wynne, McKnight, & Bichey, 1997;Mo, Harris, & Lindbaek, 2002;Quaranta, Fernandez-Vega, D'elia, Filipo, & Quaranta, 2008;Tyler, 1994;Tyler & Kelsay, 1990). However, reviews by Dauman et al. (2000), Rubinstein, Tyler, Johnson, and Brown (2003), Rubinstein, Wilson, Finley, and Abbas (1999), Quaranta, Wagstaff, and Baguley (2004), and Baguley and Atlas (2007 have questioned the nature of tinnitus reduction by electrical stimulation.Although previous studies have employed categorical ratings of the effect of CIs on perceived tinnitus severity, those data have not addressed specific aspects of benefit, nor have they provided an indication of any gradation of benefit. Other studies have provided category visual analog scales or attempted interval visual analog or magnitude estimation scales (e.g., Newman, Jacobson, & Spitzer, 1996). These metrics have the potential to distinguish between those who receive total relief of their tinnitus and those who receive partial relief. However, no study has attempted to explor...