We explore the dimensionality of attitudes towards the welfare state among university students in eight countries representing four worlds of welfare: liberal, radical, conservative and social democratic. We use new data from cross-nationally comparable 25-item questionnaires to derive a two-level bi-factorial hierarchical model that specifies six different attitude facets. These facets are clustered into two distinct sets of attitudes: the 'market-based frame', which entails (a) individualism, (b) work ethic and (c) internal attribution of inequality and the 'welfare-statist frame', which entails (d) egalitarian redistribution, (e) broad scope of welfare and (f) external attribution of social inequality. In line with our expectations, respondents across different regime types structured their welfare state attitudes according to the six a priori defined types of attitudes and two sets of opposing attitudes. The study also found that the six facets are differently affected by regime type, which further corroborates our argument that the construct of welfare attitudes is complex and inherently multidimensional. IntroductionThis article proposes to explore a new approach to study the structure of citizens' attitudes towards the welfare state in eight democracies. We ask how citizens across different welfare regimes organise and integrate their welfare attitudes across different dimensions and whether convergence can be found in attitude patterns across different regime types. To do so, we need to understand 'what welfare programmes do' and how they interact with households and labour markets in the production and allocation of welfare. The analytical focus by

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract