Background Elevated proinflammatory cytokines are associated with greater COVID-19 severity. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of sarilumab, an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, in patients with severe (requiring supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula or face mask) or critical (requiring greater supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal support) COVID-19. Methods We did a 60-day, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial at 45 hospitals in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Spain. We included adults (≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonia, who required oxygen supplementation or intensive care. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1 with permuted blocks of five) to receive intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo. Patients, care providers, outcome assessors, and investigators remained masked to assigned intervention throughout the course of the study. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement of two or more points (seven point scale ranging from 1 [death] to 7 [discharged from hospital]) in the modified intention-to-treat population. The key secondary endpoint was proportion of patients alive at day 29. Safety outcomes included adverse events and laboratory assessments. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04327388 ; EudraCT, 2020-001162-12; and WHO, U1111-1249-6021. Findings Between March 28 and July 3, 2020, of 431 patients who were screened, 420 patients were randomly assigned and 416 received placebo (n=84 [20%]), sarilumab 200 mg (n=159 [38%]), or sarilumab 400 mg (n=173 [42%]). At day 29, no significant differences were seen in median time to an improvement of two or more points between placebo (12·0 days [95% CI 9·0 to 15·0]) and sarilumab 200 mg (10·0 days [9·0 to 12·0]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·03 [95% CI 0·75 to 1·40]; log-rank p=0·96) or sarilumab 400 mg (10·0 days [9·0 to 13·0]; HR 1·14 [95% CI 0·84 to 1·54]; log-rank p=0·34), or in proportions of patients alive (77 [92%] of 84 patients in the placebo group; 143 [90%] of 159 patients in the sarilumab 200 mg group; difference −1·7 [−9·3 to 5·8]; p=0·63 vs placebo; and 159 [92%] of 173 patients in the sarilumab 400 mg group; difference 0·2 [−6·9 to 7·4]; p=0·85 vs placebo). At day 29, there were numerical, non-significant survival differences between sarilumab 400 mg (88%) and placebo (79%; difference +8·9% [95% CI −7·7 to 25·5]; p=0·25) for patients who had critical disease. No unexpected safety signals were seen. The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 65% (55 of 84) in the placebo group, 65% (103 of 159) in the sarilumab 200 mg group, and 70% (121 of 173) in the sarilumab 400 mg group, and of those leading to death 11% (nine of 84) were in the placebo group, 1...

Benznidazole had a poor tolerability profile, with a high incidence of TDs, especially in adult patients and women. Optimised dosing schedules and/or new drugs are urgently needed.

No abstract

Treatment of chronic Chagas disease relies on two drugs with a poor tolerability profile. In our cohort, 12.3% of the patients who initiated benznidazole and subsequently nifurtimox in case of nontolerance developed ARs that led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Most were women of childbearing age, a group for whom therapy has the added benefit of interrupting vertical transmission.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Objectives: Chagas disease (CD) treatment is limited to two therapeutic options: benznidazole (generally the first option in Spain) and nifurtimox. Both drugs present high rates of adverse reactions and treatment discontinuation and there is no consensus regarding the most effective administration schedule for benznidazole or how to prevent and manage treatment toxicity. We aim to compare the tolerability and treatment discontinuation rate between two different treatment schemes with benznidazole. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of adult patients with CD, enrolled from January 2014 to March 2018 in two referral centres in Madrid (Spain). Participants were treated either with benznidazole 5 mg/kg/day (full dose) over 60 days (benznidazole standard dose scheme (BSD)), or with an escalating dose lasting 5 days up to a maximum of 300 mg/day (benznidazole increasing dose scheme (BID)). Results: 471 patients were analysed: 201 in the BSD group and 270 in the BID group. There were no significant differences regarding age (40.4 (SD 8.7) vs 41 (SD 8.2) years), sex (74.1% (149/201) vs 68.5% (185/270) women), weight (69.4 (SD 12.8) vs 68.9 (SD 11) kg) or nationality (97.5% (196/201) vs 96.7% (261/270) Bolivians) between groups. There were also no differences in adverse reactions rate (55.2% (111/201) vs 55.6% (150/270)), number of adverse reactions per patient, adverse reactions type (except for arthralgias and myalgias which occurred more frequently in the BID group (0% (0/111) BSD vs 8% (12/ 150) BID; p 0.002)) and degree and time to first adverse reactions. There was significantly more treatment discontinuation (49.8% (100/201) vs 33.0% (89/270); p <0.001) in the BSD group, but not during the first 30 days of treatment (32.3% (65/201) vs 25.6% (69/270); p 0.08). Conclusion:The use of increasing doses of benznidazole for 5 days and a maximum dose of 300 mg, does not significantly improve drug tolerability. However, while the treatment discontinuation rates were similar during the first 30 days of treatment, it may improve the treatment completion rate at 60 days.

Although relatively rare, systemic endemic mycoses should be considered as potential travel-related infections in non-migrant international travellers. Epidemiological exposures should be used to guide diagnostic evaluations and treatment.

Knowing the mode of transmission of a disease can affect its control and prevention. Here, we identify 5 protozoan parasites with demonstrated presence in seminal fluid, only 1 of which has been identified as a sexually transmitted disease among humans.