No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The ability of nonpathogenic isolates of Fusarium oxysporum (np Fo ) to induce systemic resistance and defence responses against subsequent challenge with a pathogenic strain of F. oxysporum f. sp. asparagi ( Foa ) was examined in Asparagus officinalis . In a split-root experiment, roots inoculated with np Fo exhibited a hypersensitive response and those subsequently inoculated with Foa displayed resistance. Induction of systemic resistance in np Fo -treated plants led to significantly fewer necrotic lesions ( P = 0·05) and reduced Foa disease severity compared with plants not treated with np Fo . In hyphal-sandwich root inoculation experiments, activities of peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and lignin content were higher in np Fo -treated plants and increased more rapidly than in np Fo -untreated plants after Foa inoculation. Antifungal activity (inhibition of fungal spore germination and germ-tube growth) from exudates of roots inoculated with Foa were observed for np Fo -treated plants but not for np Fo -untreated plants. Thus, isolates of np Fo may function as inducers of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and defence responses against Foa invasion in A. officinalis .

Sleep is important for maintenance of normal physiology in animals. In mammals, neuropeptide Y (NPY), a homolog of Drosophila neuropeptide F (NPF), is involved in sleep regulation, with different effects in human and rat. However, the function of NPF on sleep in Drosophila melanogaster has not yet been described. In this study, we investigated the effects of NPF and its receptor-neuropeptide F receptor (NPFR1) on Drosophila sleep. Male flies over-expressing NPF or NPFR1 exhibited increased sleep during the nighttime. Further analysis demonstrated that sleep episode duration during nighttime was greatly increased and sleep latency was significantly reduced, indicating that NPF and NPFR1 promote sleep quality, and their action on sleep is not because of an impact of the NPF signal system on development. Moreover, the homeostatic regulation of flies after sleep deprivation was disrupted by altered NPF signaling, since sleep deprivation decreased transcription of NPF in control flies, and there were less sleep loss during sleep deprivation and less sleep gain after sleep deprivation in flies overexpressing NPF and NPFR1 than in control flies, suggesting that NPF system auto-regulation plays an important role in sleep homeostasis. However, these effects did not occur in females, suggesting a sex-dependent regulatory function in sleep for NPF and NPFR1. NPF in D1 brain neurons showed male-specific expression, providing the cellular locus for male-specific regulation of sleep by NPF and NPFR1. This study brings a new understanding into sleep studies of a sexually dimorphic regulatory mode in female and male flies.

No abstract

No abstract

Taken together, the results indicate that the Drosophila insulin-like peptide system is a crucial regulator of sleep.