We consider an ergodic harvesting problem with model ambiguity that arises from biology. To account for the ambiguity, the problem is constructed as a stochastic game with two players: the decision-maker (DM) chooses the 'best' harvesting policy and an adverse player chooses the 'worst' probability measure. The main result is establishing an optimal strategy (also referred to as a control) of the DM and showing that it is a threshold policy. The optimal threshold and the optimal payoff are obtained by solving a free-boundary problem emerging from the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation. As part of the proof, we fix a gap that appeared in the HJB analysis of [Alvarez and Hening, Stochastic Process. Appl., 2019, [5]], a paper that analyzed the risk-neutral version of the ergodic harvesting problem. Finally, we study the dependence of the optimal threshold and the optimal payoff on the ambiguity parameter and show that if the ambiguity goes to 0, the problem converges, to the risk-neutral problem.
Variational quantum Monte Carlo (VMC) combined with neural-network quantum states offers a novel angle of attack on the curse-of-dimensionality encountered in a particular class of partial differential equations (PDEs); namely, the real-and imaginary time-dependent Schrödinger equation. In this paper, we present a simple generalization of VMC applicable to arbitrary time-dependent PDEs, showcasing the technique in the multi-asset Black-Scholes PDE for pricing European options contingent on many correlated underlying assets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.