PURPOSE: Delays in initiation of radiotherapy may contribute to inferior oncologic outcomes that are more commonly observed in minoritized populations in the United States. We aimed to examine inequities associated with delayed initiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify the 10 cancer sites most commonly treated with IMRT. Interval to initiation of treatment (IIT) was broken into quartiles for each disease site, with the 4th quartile classified as delayed. Multivariable logistic regression for delayed IIT was performed for each disease site using clinical and demographic covariates. Differences in magnitude of delay between subsets of patients stratified by race and insurance status were evaluated using two-sample t-tests. RESULTS: Among patients (n = 350,425) treated with IMRT between 2004 and 2017, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian patients were significantly more likely to have delayed IIT with IMRT for nearly all disease sites compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. NHB, Hispanic, and Asian patients had significantly longer median IIT than NHW patients (NHB 87 days, P < .01; Hispanic 76 days, P < .01; Asian 74 days, P < .01; and NHW 67 days). NHW, Hispanic, and Asian patients with private insurance had shorter median IIT than those with Medicare ( P < .01); however, NHB patients with private insurance had longer IIT than those with Medicare ( P < .01). CONCLUSION: Delays in initiation of IMRT in NHB, Hispanic, and Asian patients may contribute to the known differences in cancer outcomes and warrant further investigation, particularly to further clarify the role of different insurance policies in delays in advanced modality radiotherapy.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Primary squamous cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive disease with historically poor outcomes and no established treatment guidelines. Case reports are limited but describe multiple treatment approaches. Seeking to identify practice patterns and treatment outcomes, we used the US National Cancer Data Base to identify 66 males with locoregional primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015. Patients were stratified into treatment groups consisting of local therapy alone ( n = 40; 61%), local therapy and chemotherapy ( n = 13; 20%), chemotherapy alone ( n = 7; 11%), and observation ( n = 6; 9%). Patients with clinical stage T3–T4 disease were significantly more likely to receive combined chemotherapy and local therapy on multivariable analysis. Median survival was 20 mo for patients treated with local therapy alone, 37 mo with local therapy and chemotherapy, and 11 mo with chemotherapy alone. Overall survival was not significantly different between treatment groups. Despite limitations in sample size, these data suggest that addition of chemotherapy to local therapy is a reasonable treatment approach for select patients. Patient summary Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate is an extremely rare disease. Our review of patterns of care using data from the National Cancer Data Base shows inconsistent use of combined local and systemic therapy. The small sample size for this rare disease limits any conclusions regarding survival differences, but the data suggest that a combination approach using chemotherapy in addition to surgery or radiation is a reasonable treatment option for disease confined to the prostate.

No abstract

Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License Author affiliations and support information (if applicable) appear at the end of this article.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

No abstract

Background Adjuvant guidelines in surgically resected p16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) with positive surgical margins (PSM) or extranodal extension (ENE) are based on randomized controlled trials predating p16 status. It remains unclear if adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary in p16+ patients with these features. Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify cases of nonmetastatic p16+ OPC diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Patients treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation (aRT) or adjuvant chemoradiation (aCRT) were eligible for analysis. Results A total of 14 071 patients were eligible for analysis. Overall survival (OS) was not statistically different between aRT and aCRT in patients with PSM (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56–1.28), ENE (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69–1.27) or both (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41–1.31). Conclusions In patients with p16+ OPC with ENE, PSM, or both, adding chemotherapy to aRT was not associated with improved OS.