The ASP method of donor selection for refractory alloimmunized patients appears as effective as HLA matching or crossmatching. Far more donors are identified in a file of HLA-typed donors by the ASP method than by HLA matching, and this indicates that the ASP method provides important advantages regarding the availability of compatible platelet components.

On March 24, 2017, more than 90 experts in blood safety and international development from blood centers, industry, government, and international and nongovernmental organizations gathered in Arlington, Virginia, for the Third International Blood Safety Forum, cosponsored by America's Blood Centers and Global Healing. This report summarizes presentations and major conclusions. The meeting explored ways to increase access to affordable, safe blood for low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) in an era when funding from the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Global Fund has been redirected from preventing the spread of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to diagnosing and treating the 25 million-plus people living with HIV in LMICs. More effective management systems must be developed to improve cost recovery for blood. While blood systems become more sustainable, continued investment is required to keep them operating. The traditional model of large grants from bilateral and multilateral donors will need to be supplemented (or replaced) with public-private partnerships and nongovernmental investment. A continued emphasis on quality is fundamental. Blood systems must build quality programs, based on accepted standards, including hospitals, clinics, and rural health care providers to ensure proper and safe use of blood. Proposals to resolve health care inequities between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs) must include helping LMICs to define sustainable national policies and practices for blood availability and utilization to suit local contexts. The blood safety lexicon should be revised to include availability, accessibility, and affordability of safe blood and blood products as the goal of all blood safety initiatives.

The incidence of transfusion-associated hepatitis in the United States has fallen dramatically since the late 1960s. Where once the risks were so great that as many as one in three transfused patients contracted hepatitis, now they are infinitesimal. Many factors share responsibility for this accomplishment; however, two stand above the rest: (i) improved donor selection and screening criteria, especially elimination of paid blood donations; and (ii) major advances in testing for viral hepatitis carriers. Currently, four tests are used for the prevention of transfusion-associated hepatitis: (i) hepatitis B surface antigen; (ii) hepatitis C virus antibody; (iii) hepatitis B core antibody; and (iv) alanine aminotransferase. The first two tests are largely responsible for the current low risks of transfusion-associated hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus of 1 in 63,000 and 1 in 125,000, per unit, respectively. To further reduce the risks of transfusion-associated hepatitis will require the enhanced sensitivity provided by nucleic acid amplification techniques (e.g. polymerase chain reaction). Currently, however, no such tests are licensed and practical, automated, or inexpensive enough for individual blood donor screening. We have made such great strides in the prevention of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis that background rates of viral hepatitis now greatly exceed the risk of transmission via transfusion. For this reason, while it may still be reasonable to consider a transfusion as a possible cause for hepatitis, it is imperative that many other possibilities (e.g., iatrogenic and other risk factors) be ruled out.

No abstract