Ecological and population biology issues constitute serious challenges to the application of genetically modified mosquitos (GMM) for disease control.

The use of gene drive to control or eradicate pest and disease vector populations is a highly controversial topic. In order to maintain independence and public trust, scientists need know who is representing whom in this debate.

Gene drive technology to control disease vectors or pests has great potential for addressing humanitarian and public health problems. Its application for pest control in agriculture, however, raises important environmental, social and ethical issues.

No abstract

Abstract. To investigate the evolutionary cost of an immune response, we selected six lines of the mosquito Aedes aegypti for earlier or later pupation and measured the extent to which this selection procedure changed the mosquito's ability to encapsulate and melanize a negatively charged Sephadex bead. After 10 generations of selection, the age at pupation in the two selection regimes differed by about 0.7 days, accompanied by an increase of wing length of the mosquitoes selected for late pupation. Among the mosquitoes that had been selected for early pupation, only 6% had strongly or completely melanized the bead, while among the individuals that had been selected for late pupation, 32% had melanized the bead. Thus, our results suggest a genetic correlation between age at pupation and immunocompetence. As a consequence, mosquitoes that respond to increased intense parasite pressure with more effective immunity are predicted to pay for the increased defense with slower development.

We describe a model of host-parasite coevolution, where the interaction depends on the investments by the host in its immune response and by the parasite in its ability to suppress (or evade) its host's immune response. We base our model on the interaction between malaria parasites and their mosquito hosts and thus describe the epidemiological dynamics with the Macdonald-Ross equation of malaria epidemiology. The qualitative predictions of the model are most sensitive to the cost of the immune response and to the intensity of transmission. If transmission is weak or the cost of immunity is low, the system evolves to a coevolutionarily stable equilibrium at intermediate levels of investment (and, generally, at a low frequency of resistance). At a higher cost of immunity and as transmission intensifies, the system is not evolutionarily stable but rather cycles around intermediate levels of investment. At more intense transmission, neither host nor parasite invests any resources in dominating its partner so that no resistance is observed in the population. These results may help to explain the lack of encapsulated malaria parasites generally observed in natural populations of mosquito vectors, despite strong selection pressure for resistance in areas of very intense transmission.

No abstract

Malaria parasites develop as oocysts within the haemocoel of their mosquito vector during a period that is longer than the average lifespan of many of their vectors. How can they escape from the mosquito's immune responses during their long development? Whereas older oocysts might camouflage themselves by incorporating mosquito-derived proteins into their surface capsule, younger stages are susceptible to the mosquito's immune response and must rely on other methods of immune evasion. We show that the malaria parasite Plasmodium gallinaceum suppresses the encapsulation immune response of its mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti, and in particular that the parasite uses both an indirect and a direct strategy for immunosuppression. Thus, when we fed mosquitoes with the plasma of infected chickens, the efficacy of the mosquitoes to encapsulate negatively charged Sephadex beads was considerably reduced, whether the parasite was present in the blood meal or not. In addition, zygotes that were created ex vivo and added to the blood of uninfected chickens reduced the efficacy of the encapsulation response. As dead zygotes had no effect on encapsulation, this result demonstrates active suppression of the mosquito's immune response by malaria parasites.