BACKGROUNDThe efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel, as compared with an androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide), in patients with metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer who were previously treated with docetaxel and had progression within 12 months while receiving the alternative inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide) are unclear. METHODSWe randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients who had previously received docetaxel and an androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide) to receive cabazitaxel (at a dose of 25 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously every 3 weeks, plus prednisone daily and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) or the other androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (either 1000 mg of abiraterone plus prednisone daily or 160 mg of enzalutamide daily). The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival. Secondary end points of survival, response, and safety were assessed. RESULTSA total of 255 patients underwent randomization. After a median follow-up of 9.2 months, imaging-based progression or death was reported in 95 of 129 patients (73.6%) in the cabazitaxel group, as compared with 101 of 126 patients (80.2%) in the group that received an androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median imagingbased progression-free survival was 8.0 months with cabazitaxel and 3.7 months with the androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor. The median overall survival was 13.6 months with cabazitaxel and 11.0 months with the androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.89; P = 0.008). The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months with cabazitaxel and 2.7 months with an androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68; P<0.001), a prostate-specific antigen response occurred in 35.7% and 13.5% of the patients, respectively (P<0.001), and tumor response was noted in 36.5% and 11.5% (P = 0.004). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 56.3% of patients receiving cabazitaxel and in 52.4% of those receiving an androgensignaling-targeted inhibitor. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONSCabazitaxel significantly improved a number of clinical outcomes, as compared with the androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide), in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had been previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-signaling-targeted agent (abiraterone or enzalutamide). (Funded by Sanofi; CARD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02485691.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective To assess the safety profile of slow-release (SR)The eÂect on supine blood pressure was minimal. In the subgroups of elderly and hypertensive patients alfuzosin in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), with special attention to orthostatic blood treated with SR alfuzosin, the cumulative incidence of asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension during the first pressure changes, postural symptoms and eÃcacy. Patients and methods Two placebo-controlled studies month of treatment was slightly higher than with placebo with no objective consequences on the inciinvolving 588 patients (292 receiving SR alfuzosin 5 mg twice daily and 296 a placebo) were pooled; dence of adverse events. The clinical eÃcacy of SR alfuzosin was confirmed by a significant improvement 51% of the patients were Á65 years of age and 43% had associated cardiovascular disease including hyperin urinary symptoms and a significant increase in maximum flow rates. tension and/or were receiving concomitant antihypertensive drugs.Conclusion SR alfuzosin (10 mg/day) can be administered safely without titration in patients with BPO, Results SR alfuzosin was very well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to that of even in elderly and hypertensive patients. Its favourable benefit/risk ratio allows alfuzosin to be classified placebo (18.5% and 15.8% of patients, respectively) and an overall incidence of withdrawal from therapy as a clinically uroselective a 1 -blocker. Specific analysis of orthostatic changes in blood pressure is important for adverse events lower than that of placebo (3.4% and 5.7%, respectively). Adverse events potentially when assessing the safety profile of an a 1 -blocker in patients with BPO. related to vasodilatation were infrequent with SR alfuzosin (the same incidence as with placebo, i.e.Keywords Benign prostatic obstruction, slow-release alfuzosin, a 1 -blocker therapy, safety profile, clinical 2.7% of patients) and these adverse events occurred mainly during the first month of alfuzosin treatment.uroselectivity, orthostatic hypotension general practice [8]. In addition, besides improving LUTS Introduction and urodynamic variables, treatment with alfuzosin has a favourable impact on the quality of life of patients with The treatment of patients suÂering from benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) with a 1 -blocking agents is well estab-BPO [9]. Alfuzosin was initially available in Europe as an immediate-release formulation administered three lished and their eÂect on LUTS and urodynamics are assumed to be globally similar [1]. The main side-eÂects times daily. In fact, once-a-day and twice-a-day regimens have been shown to be associated with significantly associated with a 1 -blockers are postural symptoms relative to orthostatic hypotension, resulting from an impairbetter compliance (73% and 70%, respectively) than thrice-daily regimens (52%) [10]. In addition, the inciment of the compensatory reflex mechanism mediated by the sympathetic nervous system normally brought dence and severity of ...

Background Better blood tests to elucidate the behaviour of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are urgently needed to drive therapeutic decisions. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) comprises normal and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Low-pass whole-genome sequencing (lpWGS) of ctDNA can provide information on mCRPC behaviour. Objective To validate and clinically qualify plasma lpWGS for mCRPC. Design, setting, and participants Plasma lpWGS data were obtained for mCRPC patients consenting to optional substudies of two prospective phase 3 trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA). In FIRSTANA, chemotherapy-naïve patients were randomised to treatment with docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 ) or cabazitaxel (20 or 25 mg/m 2 ). In PROSELICA, patients previously treated with docetaxel were randomised to 20 or 25 mg/m 2 cabazitaxel. lpWGS data were generated from 540 samples from 188 mCRPC patients acquired at four different time points (screening, cycle 1, cycle 4, and end of study). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis lpWGS data for ctDNA were evaluated for prognostic, response, and tumour genomic measures. Associations with response and survival data were determined for tumour fraction. Genomic biomarkers including large-scale transition (LST) scores were explored in the context of prior treatments. Results and limitations Plasma tumour fraction was prognostic for overall survival in univariable and stratified multivariable analyses (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.08–2.85; p = 0.024) and offered added value compared to existing biomarkers (C index 0.722 vs 0.709; p = 0.021). Longitudinal changes were associated with drug response. PROSELICA samples were enriched for LSTs ( p = 0.029) indicating genomic instability, and this enrichment was associated with prior abiraterone and enzalutamide treatment but not taxane or radiation therapy. Higher LSTs were correlated with losses of RB1 / RNASEH2B , independent of BRCA2 loss. Conclusions Plasma lpWGS of ctDNA describes CRPC behaviour, providing prognostic and response data of clinical relevance. The added prognostic value of the ctDNA fraction over established biomarkers should be studied further. Patient summary We studied tumour DNA in blood samples from patients with prostate cancer. We found that levels of tumour DNA in blood were indicative of disease prognosis, and that changes after treatment could be detected. We also observed a “genetic scar” in the results that was associated with certain previous treatments. This test allows an assessment of tumour activity that can complement existing tests, offer insights into drug respo...

Background There is growing evidence that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the CARD study (NCT02485691), cabazitaxel significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-receptor-targeted agent (ARTA). Here, we investigated NLR as a biomarker. Patients and methods CARD was a multicenter, open-label study that randomized patients with mCRPC to receive cabazitaxel (25 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks) versus abiraterone (1000 mg/day) or enzalutamide (160 mg/day). The relationships between baseline NLR [< versus ≥ median (3.38)] and rPFS, OS, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, and prostate-specific antigen response to cabazitaxel versus ARTA were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of covariates was used to investigate the prognostic association between baseline NLR and OS. Results The rPFS benefit with cabazitaxel versus ARTA was particularly marked in patients with high NLR {8.5 versus 2.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.67]; P < 0.0001}, compared with low NLR [7.5 versus 5.1 months, respectively; HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.45-1.06); P = 0.0860]. Higher NLR (continuous covariate, per 1 unit increase) independently associated with poor OS [HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08); P = 0.0003]. For cabazitaxel, there was no OS difference between patients with high versus low NLR (15.3 versus 12.9 months, respectively; P = 0.7465). Patients receiving an ARTA with high NLR, however, had a worse OS versus those with low NLR (9.5 versus 13.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0608). Conclusions High baseline NLR predicts poor outcomes with an ARTA in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative ARTA. Conversely, the activity of cabazitaxel is retained irrespective of NLR.