The initiation and progression of cancer is controlled by both genetic and epigenetic events. Unlike genetic alterations, which are almost impossible to reverse, epigenetic aberrations are potentially reversible, allowing the malignant cell population to revert to a more normal state. With the advent of numerous drugs that target specific enzymes involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, the utilization of epigenetic targets is emerging as an effective and valuable approach to chemotherapy as well as chemoprevention of cancer.

DNA methylation, histone modifications, and nucleosomal occupancy collaborate to cause silencing of tumor-related genes in cancer. The development of drugs that target these processes is therefore important for cancer therapy. Inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, drugs that target other mechanisms still need to be developed. Recently, 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep) was reported to selectively inhibit trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3) and lysine 20 on histone H4 (H4K20me3) as well as reactivate silenced genes in cancer cells. This finding opens the door to the pharmacologic inhibition of histone methylation. We therefore wanted to further study the mechanism of action of DZNep in cancer cells. Western blot analysis shows that DZNep globally inhibits histone methylation and is not selective. Two other drugs, sinefungin and adenosine dialdehyde, have similar effects as DZNep on H3K27me3. Intriguingly, chromatin immunoprecipitation of various histone modifications and microarray analysis show that DZNep acts through a different pathway than 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. These observations give us interesting insight into how chromatin structure affects gene expression. We also determined the kinetics of gene activation to understand if the induced changes were somatically heritable. We found that upon removal of DZNep, gene expression is reduced to its original state. This suggests that there is a homeostatic mechanism that returns the histone modifications to their “ground state” after DZNep treatment. Our data show the strong need for further development of histone methylation inhibitors

Almost 1-2% of the human genome is located within 500 bp of either side of a transcription initiation site, whereas a far larger proportion (Ϸ25%) is potentially transcribable by elongating RNA polymerases. This observation raises the question of how the genome is packaged into chromatin to allow start sites to be recognized by the regulatory machinery at the same time as transcription initiation, but not elongation, is blocked in the 25% of intragenic DNA. We developed a chromatin scanning technique called ChAP, coupling the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay with arbitrarily primed PCR, which allows for the rapid and unbiased comparison of histone modification patterns within the eukaryotic nucleus. Methylated lysine 4 (K4) and acetylated K9͞14 of histone H3 were both highly localized to the 5 regions of transcriptionally active human genes but were greatly decreased downstream of the start sites. Our results suggest that the large transcribed regions of human genes are maintained in a deacetylated conformation in regions read by elongating polymerase. Common models depicting widespread histone acetylation and K4 methylation throughout the transcribed unit do not therefore apply to the majority of human genes.

The frequent silencing of tumor suppressor genes by altered cytosine methylation and chromatin structural changes makes this process an attractive target for epigenetic therapy. Here we show that zebularine, a stable DNA cytosine methylation inhibitor, is preferentially incorporated into DNA and exhibits greater cell growth inhibition and gene expression in cancer cell lines compared to normal fibroblasts. In addition, zebularine preferentially depleted DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and induced expression of cancer-related antigen genes in cancer cells relative to normal fibroblasts. Our results demonstrate that zebularine can be selective toward cancer cells and may hold clinical promise as an anticancer therapy.

Previous studies have shown that DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt) 1 is required for maintenance of bulk DNA methylation and is essential for mouse development. However, somatic disruption of DNMT1 in the human cancer cell line HCT116 was not lethal and caused only minor decreases in methylation. Here, we report the identification of a truncated DNMT1 protein, which was generated by the disruption of DNMT1 in HCT116 cells. The truncated protein, which had parts of the regulatory N-terminal domain deleted but preserved the catalytic C-terminal domain, was present at different levels in all DNMT1 single-knockout and DNMT1͞DNMT3b doubleknockout cell lines tested and retained hemimethylase activity. DNMT1 RNAi resulted in decreased cell viability in WT and knockout cells and further loss of DNA methylation in DNMT1 knockout cells. Furthermore, we observed a delay in methylation after replication and an increase in hemimethylation of specific CpG sites in cells expressing the truncated protein. Remethylation studies after drug-induced hypomethylation suggest a putative role of DNMT1 in the de novo methylation of a subtelomeric repeat, D4Z4, which is lost in cells lacking full-length DNMT1. Our data suggest that DNMT1 might be essential for maintenance of DNA methylation, proliferation, and survival of cancer cells. DNA methylation ͉ epigeneticT he biological roles of the major mammalian DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt), DNMT1, have been enigmatic. Although gene-targeting studies in mice have clearly demonstrated an essential function of Dnmt1 in embryonic development, cell survival, and tumorigenesis (1), there have been controversial reports regarding the function of this enzyme in human cancer cells. In mice, Dnmt1 has been implicated in maintaining the majority of bulk DNA methylation, differentiation of ES cells, and imprinting (2, 3). Furthermore, deletion of Dnmt1 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts caused a decrease in genomic methylation, p53-dependent apoptosis, and deregulation of transcription (4). Heterozygosity for Dnmt1 in combination with administration of the DNMT inhibitor 5-aza-2Јdeoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR) greatly reduced the number of polyps in a mouse model for intestinal neoplasia (5).A series of RNAi experiments for DNMT1 have been described for various human cancer cell lines, which have shown apparently inconsistent results in regard to DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes (6-10). The differences might be attributed to the techniques used but also to distinct sensitivities of individual cell lines (10). Furthermore, RNAi may not cause a complete depletion of the protein, so residual protein might still be available and capable of maintaining DNA methylation. Rhee et al. (11,12) generated a widely used series of HCT116 colon cancer cells with homozygous deletions for DNMT1 (DNMT1 Ϫ/Ϫ ) (11), DNMT3b (DNMT3b Ϫ/Ϫ ) (12), or both DNMT1 and DNMT3b (12) [double knockout (DKO)]. Surprisingly, somatic disruption of DNMT1 resulted in only a 20% decrease in overall genomic methylation with no discernible changes i...

Purpose: There is increasing evidence for a fundamental role for epigenetic silencing of apoptotic pathways in cancer. Changes in DNA methylation can be detected with a high degree of sensitivity, so we used the MethyLight assay to determine how methylation patterns of apoptosis-associated genes change during bladder carcinogenesis and whether DNA methylation could be detected in urine sediments.Experimental Design: We analyzed the methylation status of the 5 regions of 12 apoptosis-associated genes (ARF, FADD, TNFRSF21, BAX, LITAF, DAPK, TMS-1, BCL2, RASSF1A, TERT, TNFRSF25, and EDNRB) in 18 bladder cancer cell lines, 127 bladder cancer samples, and 37 samples of adjacent normal bladder mucosa using the quantitative MethyLight assay. We also analyzed the methylation status in urine sediments of 20 cancer-free volunteers and 37 bladder cancer patients.Results: The 5 regions of DAPK, BCL2, TERT, RASS-FIA, and TNFRSF25 showed significant increases in methylation levels when compared with nonmalignant adjacent tissue (P < 0.01). Methylation levels of BCL2 were significantly associated with tumor staging and grading (P < 0.01), whereas methylation levels of RASSF1A and ARF were only associated with tumor stage (P < 0.04), and TERT methylation and EDNRB methylation were predictors of tumor grade (P < 0.02). To investigate clinical usefulness for noninvasive bladder cancer detection, we further analyzed the methylation status of the markers in urine samples of patients with bladder cancer. Methylation of DAPK, BCL2, and TERT in urine sediment DNA from bladder cancer patients was detected in the majority of samples (78%), whereas they were unmethylated in the urine sediment DNA from agematched cancer-free individuals.Conclusions: Our results indicate that methylation of the 5 region of apoptosis-associated genes is a common finding in patients with bladder carcinoma. The ability to detect methylation not only in bladder tissue, but also in urine sediments, suggests that methylation markers are promising tools for noninvasive detection of bladder cancers. Our results also indicate that some methylation markers, such as those in regions of RASSF1A and TNFRSF25, might be of limited use for detection because they are also methylated in normal bladder tissues.

Proper DNA methylation patterns are essential for mammalian development and differentiation. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) primarily establish and maintain global DNA methylation patterns; however, the molecular mechanisms for the generation and inheritance of methylation patterns are still poorly understood. We used sucrose density gradients of nucleosomes prepared by partial and maximum micrococcal nuclease digestion, coupled with Western blot analysis to probe for the interactions between DNMTs and native nucleosomes. This method allows for analysis of the in vivo interactions between the chromatin modification enzymes and their actual nucleosomal substrates in the native state. We show that little free DNA methyltransferase 3A and 3B (DNMT3A/3B) exist in the nucleus and that almost all of the cellular contents of DNMT3A/3B, but not DNMT1, are strongly anchored to a subset of nucleosomes. This binding of DNMT3A/3B does not require the presence of other well-known chromatin-modifying enzymes or proteins, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen, heterochromatin protein 1, methyl-CpG binding protein 2, Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2, histone deacetylase 1, and UHRF1, but it does require an intact nucleosomal structure. We also show that nucleosomes containing methylated SINE and LINE elements and CpG islands are the main sites of DNMT3A/3B binding. These data suggest that inheritance of DNA methylation requires cues from the chromatin component in addition to hemimethylation.Proper DNA methylation patterns are essential for mammalian development and differentiation. More than three decades ago, de novo cytosine DNA methylation and its maintenance were proposed to exist in eukaryotic cells (29, 54); however, the molecular mechanisms for the generation and inheritance of methylation patterns are still poorly understood. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B primarily establish and maintain global DNA methylation patterns (39, 48). DNMT1 preferentially methylates hemimethylated DNA in vitro (7) and is tethered to replication foci during S phase (38). In contrast, DNMT3A and DNMT3B (DNMT3A/3B) have no preference for hemimethylated DNA (49) and are required for de novo methylation of genomic DNA (48). It has been thought that DNMT1 acts mainly as a "maintenance methyltransferase" during DNA synthesis and that DNMT3A and DNMT3B act as "de novo" enzymes. However, more recent studies indicate that DNMT1 may also be required for de novo methylation of genomic DNA (17,30) and that DNMT3A/3B are also required for maintenance functions (11,40,55). Furthermore, the different DNMTs cooperate in maintaining the methylation of some regions of the genome, particularly repetitive elements (40,53).Recruitment of individual DNMT enzymes to different regions of chromatin in vivo, particularly to gene regulatory regions, may require interaction with auxiliary factors (28, 36). DNMT1, which is diffusely localized throughout nuclei in non-S-phase cells (38), is targeted to replication foci by interacting with prolif...

DNA cytosine methylation plays a considerable role in normal development, gene regulation, and carcinogenesis. Hypermethylation of the promoters of some tumor suppressor genes and the associated silencing of these genes often occur in certain cancer types. The reversal of this process by DNA methylation inhibitors is a promising new strategy for cancer therapy. In addition to the four wellcharacterized nucleoside analogue methylation inhibitors, 5-azacytidine, 5-aza-2V -deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR), 5-fluoro-2V -deoxycytidine, and zebularine, there is a growing list of non-nucleoside inhibitors. However, a systemic study comparing these potential demethylating agents has not been done. In this study, we examined three non-nucleoside demethylating agents, (À)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, hydralazine, and procainamide, and compared their effects and potencies with 5-Aza-CdR, the most potent DNA methylation inhibitor. We found that 5-Aza-CdR is far more effective in DNA methylation inhibition as well as in reactivating genes, compared with non-nucleoside inhibitors. [Mol Cancer Ther 2005;4(10):1515 -20]