2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential response of cancer cells to zebularine

Abstract: The frequent silencing of tumor suppressor genes by altered cytosine methylation and chromatin structural changes makes this process an attractive target for epigenetic therapy. Here we show that zebularine, a stable DNA cytosine methylation inhibitor, is preferentially incorporated into DNA and exhibits greater cell growth inhibition and gene expression in cancer cell lines compared to normal fibroblasts. In addition, zebularine preferentially depleted DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and induced expression of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
224
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
16
224
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment of tumorconditioned HUVECs with the DNMT inhibitor DAC significantly restored ICAM-1 protein expression (P < 0.01). A similar effect was observed after treatment with zebularine, a recently discovered DNMT inhibitor that requires higher effective concentrations (22,25), or with the HDAC inhibitor TSA (P < 0.01). Because DNMTs and HDACs cooperate in gene silencing (15), we further treated tumor-conditioned HUVEC with a combination of DAC and TSA (14).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment of tumorconditioned HUVECs with the DNMT inhibitor DAC significantly restored ICAM-1 protein expression (P < 0.01). A similar effect was observed after treatment with zebularine, a recently discovered DNMT inhibitor that requires higher effective concentrations (22,25), or with the HDAC inhibitor TSA (P < 0.01). Because DNMTs and HDACs cooperate in gene silencing (15), we further treated tumor-conditioned HUVEC with a combination of DAC and TSA (14).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…14; Sigma, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands) or zebularine (100 Amol/L; ref. 22; obtained from National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD), or with the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA; 300 nmol/L; ref. 14; Wako, Neuss, Germany), replacing drugs and culture medium every 24 hours, as described previously (14,19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three types of tissues were analyzed for methylation, and a considerable amount of demethylation was detected in large and small intestines whereas no decrease in methylation was seen in skin epidermal cells, indicating that the turnover of these cells may be responsible for the tissue-specific demethylation. It would be of interest to determine whether zebularine activity is dependent on the rate of cell division in vivo as it is in vitro (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zebularine, a novel inhibitor of DNA methylation, has been shown to have anticancer properties in vivo and in vitro (12)(13)(14)(15). Unlike 5-azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, which are chemically labile, zebularine is stable, making it possible to deliver the drug orally (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medical importance of CG-X antigens is supported by the observation that vaccine-induced CD8 þ T-cell responses to CG-X antigens, but not to melanoma differentiation antigens, correlates with tumor-free and overall survival in melanoma patients (Reynolds et al, 2003). Treatment with agents that increase the expression of CG-X antigens, including DAC (Karpf et al, 2004;Sigalotti et al, 2004) and zebularine (Cheng et al, 2004), constitute an intriguing therapeutic approach by which antitumor immunity to CG-X antigen-directed vaccines could be improved (Karpf and Jones, 2002;Maio et al, 2003;Guo et al, 2006). However, the toxicity and pleiotropic effects associated with nucleoside analog DNMT inhibitors could be a barrier to the successful clinical implementation of this combination strategy (Karpf and Jones, 2002).…”
Section: Ac-k9mentioning
confidence: 99%