No abstract

Three stillborn fetuses are reported in which an abdominal wall defect was associated with defects in the urogenital and anal region. Autopsy of these fetuses provided clues indicative of how and where the embryonic development went wrong. The malformation involved a disturbance of the cell deposition process, occurring in the caudal part of the embryo. During the cell deposition process, which takes place in the neural crest and the body wall placode, ectodermal cells are added to the mesodermal compartment of the embryo, thus contributing to the anlagen of several structures, including the ventral body wall. In addition, a change in the shape of the embryo is generated. The sequence of events resulting from a disturbance of the cell deposition process is explained.

Sampling error is an inherent problem of prostate biopsy. Consequently, there are problems in determining whether a given carcinoma is clinically significant on the basis of biopsy results. This study assesses the factors that predispose to errors in biopsy grading, as well as the dimensions of sampling error due to these factors. Among 187 cases, biopsy grading error was retrospectively related to grade heterogeneity in the prostate and to biopsy-related factors. Clinically relevant biopsy grading errors occurred in a quarter of the cases. Of all grading errors, at least 17% resulted from misinterpretation by the pathologist only. Overall, prostates with grade heterogeneity revealed grading errors twice as frequently as specimens without grade heterogeneity. In most cases, however, grading error resulted from multiple factors, such as the number and length of cores obtained (p<0.05). This was an important finding because the mean core length was only 9.4 mm, whereas the biopsy needle is designed to obtain cores of 15 mm. Moreover, clinically relevant biopsy grading error had occurred in almost half of the cases when the Gleason score was based on a tumour deposit measvring less than 0.5 mm (p<0.05). The clinical consequences of these findings are important. Clinicians should try to obtain at least six biopsies, each 15 mm in length, to minimize grading error. Pathologists should be cautious in reporting Gleason scores based on tumour lesions smaller than 400x total magnification field. Interpretation could be refined, when necessary, by warning the urologist of the Limitations of the biopsy report.

Purpose: The reliability and objectivity of computer assisted transrectal ultrasound are exam ined.M aterials and Methods: Pathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimens was compared prospectively to automated cancer detection in corresponding transrectal ultrasound im ages.Results: For automated cancer detection, a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.78 were obtained. Moreover, 74% of hum an interpretation of the percentage of malignancy in the analyzed im ages was equal to the actual calculated percentage (Pearson's product moment correla tion coefficient 0.85).Conclusions: Comparing these results to those obtained with normal transrectal ultrasound, autom ated analysis provides additional information in the interpretation of transrectal ultra sound images by color coding them in an objective manner according to the probability of malignancy.

Comparing these results to those obtained with normal transrectal ultrasound, automated analysis provides additional information in the interpretation of transrectal ultrasound images by color coding them in an objective manner according to the probability of malignancy.