Background and aims: Osteopenia and osteoporosis are frequent in Crohn's disease. However, there are few data on related vertebral fractures. Therefore, we evaluated prospectively the prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in these patients. Methods: A total of 293 patients were screened with dual energy x ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal right femur. In 156 patients with lumbar osteopenia or osteoporosis (T score <−1), x ray examinations of the thoracic and lumbar spine were performed. Assessment of fractures included visual reading of x rays and quantitative morphometry of the vertebral bodies (T4-L4), analogous to the criteria of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Results: In 34 (21.8%; 18 female) of 156 Crohn's disease patients with reduced bone mineral density, 63 osteoporotic vertebral fractures (50 fx. (osteoporotic fracture with visible fracture line running into the vertebral body and/or change of outer shape) and 13 fxd. (osteoporotic fracture with change of outer shape but without visible fracture line)) were found, 50 fx. in 25 (16%, 15 female) patients and 13 fxd. in nine (5.8%, three female) patients. In four patients the fractures were clinically evident and associated with severe back pain. Approximately one third of patients with fractures were younger than 30 years. Lumbar bone mineral density was significantly reduced in patients with fractures compared with those without (T score −2.50 (0.88) v −2.07 (0.66); p<0.025) but not at the hip (−2.0 (1.1) v −1.81 (0.87); p=0.38). In subgroups analyses, no significant differences were observed. Conclusions: In patients with Crohn's disease and reduced bone mineral density, the prevalence of vertebral fractures-that is, manifest osteoporosis-was strikingly high at 22%, even in those aged less than 30 years, a problem deserving further clinical attention.
The EQ-5D is reasonably valid, reliable and responsive in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. It can be used to generate preference-based valuations of health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease.
Background: A prospective randomized trial in patients with Crohn disease studied whether 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) concentration-adapted azathioprine (AZA) therapy is clinically superior to a standard dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day AZA. Methods: After 2 weeks of standard therapy, patients (n ؍ 71) were randomized into standard (n ؍ 32) or adapted-dose (n ؍ 25) groups; 14 patients dropped out before randomization. In the adapted group, the AZA dose was adjusted to maintain 6-TGN concentrations between 250 and 400 pmol/8 ؋ 10 8 erythrocytes (Ery). Response criteria were the number of patients in remission after 16 weeks without steroids (primary) and remission after 24 weeks, frequency of side effects, and quality of life (secondary).Results: After 16 weeks, 14 of 32 (43.8%) patients in the standard group vs 11 of 25 (44%) in the adapted group were in remission without steroids (intent-to-treat analysis). After 24 weeks, 43.8% vs 40% were in remission. No significant differences were found concerning quality of life, disease activity, 6-TGN concentrations, AZA dose, or dropouts due to side effects. Sixty-six patients had a wild-type thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype, with TPMT activities of 8 to 20 nmol/(mL Ery ؋ h). Five patients (dropouts after randomization) were heterozygous, with TPMT activities <8 nmol/(mL Ery ؋ h). 6-Methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP) concentrations >5700 pmol/8 ؋ 10 8 Ery were not associated with hepatotoxicity. Conclusion: Standard and adapted dosing with the provided dosing scheme led to identical 6-TGN concentrations and remission rates. Adapted dosing had no apparent clinical benefit for patients with TPMT activity between 8 and 20 nmol/(mL Ery ؋ h). Additionally, 6-MMP monitoring had no predictive value for hepatotoxicity.
Summary
Background : Osteoporosis is a frequent complication in Crohn's disease. Although the efficacy of both sodium fluoride and aminobisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis has been investigated in long‐term therapy studies, no long‐term results are available regarding the effect of these agents in the management of osteoporosis in patients with Crohn's disease.
Methods : Eighty‐four patients with Crohn's disease and pathological bone mineral density findings were randomized to receive either vitamin D3 (1000 IU) and calcium citrate (800 mg) daily (group A) or sodium fluoride (25 mg b.d., group B) or intravenous ibandronate (1 mg every 3 months, group C) in addition to daily calcium/vitamin D substitution. On admission to the study and after 12 and 27 months, patients underwent dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and radiological examination of the spine.
Results : Sixty‐eight patients completed the 1‐year observation period and were available for the intention‐to‐treat analysis. No new vertebral fractures were diagnosed. In group A, lumbar bone density increased by 2.6% (P = 0.066, N.S.), in group B by 5.7% (P = 0.003) and in group C by 5.4% (P = 0.003). Therapy with sodium fluoride was associated with an increase in osteocalcin (N.S.), whereas administration of ibandronate was associated with a decrease in the resorption parameter, carboxy‐terminal cross‐linked type‐I collagen telopeptide (P < 0.05). Both sodium fluoride and ibandronate resulted in significant decreases in the serum concentration of osteoprotegerin after 9 months (P < 0.001).
Conclusions : The findings of the present study show that both sodium fluoride and ibandronate are effective in combination with calcium and vitamin D substitution in the management of osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with Crohn's disease. Both agents are safe and well tolerated, and induce continuous increases in lumbar bone density.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.