Plant nuclear genomes encode hundreds of predicted organellar RNA binding proteins, few of which have been connected with their physiological RNA substrates and functions. In fact, among the largest family of putative RNA binding proteins in plants, the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) family, no physiologically relevant RNA ligands have been firmly established. We used the chloroplast-splicing factor CAF1 to demonstrate the fidelity of a microarray-based method for identifying RNAs associated with specific proteins in chloroplast extract. We then used the same method to identify RNAs associated with the maize (Zea mays) PPR protein CRP1. Two mRNAs whose translation is CRP1-dependent were strongly and specifically enriched in CRP1 coimmunoprecipitations. These interactions establish CRP1 as a translational regulator by showing that the translation defects in crp1 mutants are a direct consequence of the absence of CRP1. Additional experiments localized these interactions to the 59 untranslated regions and suggested a possible CRP1 interaction motif. These results enhance understanding of the PPR protein family by showing that a PPR protein influences gene expression through association with specific mRNAs in vivo, suggesting an unusual mode of RNA binding for PPR proteins, and highlighting the possibility that translational regulation may be a particularly common function of PPR proteins. Analogous methods should have broad application for the study of native RNA-protein interactions in both mitochondria and chloroplasts.
The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) is a degenerate 35-amino acid repeat motif that is widely distributed among eukaryotes. Genetic, biochemical, and bioinformatic data suggest that many PPR proteins influence specific posttranscriptional steps in mitochondrial or chloroplast gene expression and that they may typically bind RNA. However, biological functions have been determined for only a few PPR proteins, and with few exceptions, substrate RNAs are unknown. To gain insight into the functions and substrates of the PPR protein family, we characterized the maize (Zea mays) nuclear gene ppr4, which encodes a chloroplast-targeted protein harboring both a PPR tract and an RNA recognition motif. Microarray analysis of RNA that coimmunoprecipitates with PPR4 showed that PPR4 is associated in vivo with the first intron of the plastid rps12 pre-mRNA, a group II intron that is transcribed in segments and spliced in trans. ppr4 mutants were recovered through a reverse-genetic screen and shown to be defective for rps12 trans-splicing. The observations that PPR4 is associated in vivo with rps12-intron 1 and that it is also required for its splicing demonstrate that PPR4 is an rps12 trans-splicing factor. These findings add trans-splicing to the list of RNA-related functions associated with PPR proteins and suggest that plastid group II trans-splicing is performed by different machineries in vascular plants and algae.
Bacterial group II introns encode maturase proteins required for splicing. In organelles of photosynthetic land plants, most of the group II introns have lost the reading frames for maturases. Here, we show that the plastidial maturase MatK not only interacts with its encoding intron within trnK-UUU, but also with six additional group II introns, all belonging to intron subclass IIA. Mapping analyses of RNA binding sites revealed MatK to recognize multiple regions within the trnK intron. Organellar group II introns are considered to be the ancestors of nuclear spliceosomal introns. That MatK associates with multiple intron ligands makes it an attractive model for an early trans-acting nuclear splicing activity.roup II introns are highly structured ribozymes, found in bacteria and organellar genomes of plants, fungi, protists, and some animals. They catalyze their own excision from precursor RNAs (1). In addition, bacterial group II introns are mobile genetic elements. These features, as well as structural similarities with nuclear introns, have led to the proposition that ancestors of modern group II introns have crossed kingdoms from prokaryotes to eukaryotes via eubacterial endosymbionts, and eventually evolved into nuclear introns (2). Whereas nuclear introns are removed by a large ribonucleoprotein complex called the spliceosome, each bacterial intron encodes a distinct maturase protein facilitating its splicing. The evolutionary transition from the highly specific, maturase-driven splicing toward the complex transacting spliceosomal machinery is unclear. Without any "living fossils" with a protospliceosome, a key question is how the emerging intron diversification was accompanied by a splicing machinery with the ability to act on multiple targets. At least initially, the already existing splicing factors encoded by the invading group II introns, i.e., modified maturases, may have fulfilled this task.In present day organelles, maturase genes can be found in fungal and plant mitochondria as well as in plant chloroplasts. Although mitochondria are not directly amenable to transgenic studies, there are a number of plant species, foremost tobacco, for which directed mutagenesis of chloroplast genomes is possible (3). All land plant chloroplasts with the exception of some parasitic species in the genus Cuscuta (4, 5) contain a single maturase gene called matK in the intron of the lysine tRNA-K (UUU) gene. matK is expressed at least in green tissue (6-8). Sequence and structural homologies are found to the RNA binding motif (domain X) and the reverse transcriptase domain typically found in bacterial maturases (9, 10). Both domains are involved in splicing. By contrast, domains required for the mobility of group II introns are missing in MatK.The function of matK in chloroplasts is so far unknown, but its position inside the trnK gene suggests a role for splicing the trnK precursor. Importantly, it has been suggested that other chloroplast introns are targeted by MatK as well: firstly, several chloroplast genomes o...
Chloroplast RNA metabolism is controlled and excecuted by hundreds of nuclear-encoded, chloroplast-localized RNA binding proteins. Contrary to the nucleo-cytosolic compartment or bacteria, there is little evidence for non-coding RNAs that play a role as riboregulators of chloroplasts. We mined deep-sequencing datasets to identify short (16–28 nt) RNAs in the chloroplast genome and found 50 abundant small RNAs (sRNAs) represented by multiple, in some cases, thousands of sequencing reads, whereas reads are in general absent from the surrounding sequence space. Other than sRNAs representing the most highly abundant mRNAs, tRNAs and rRNAs, most sRNAs are located in non-coding regions and many are found a short distance upstream of start codons. By transcript end mapping we show that the 5′ and 3′ termini of chloroplast RNAs coincide with the ends of sRNAs. Sequences of sRNAs identified in Arabidopsis are conserved between different angiosperm species and in several cases, we identified putative orthologs in rice deep sequencing datasets. Recently, it was suggested that small chloroplast RNA fragments could result from the protective action of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins against exonucleases, i.e. footprints of RNA binding proteins. Our data support this scenario on a transcriptome-wide level and suggest that a large number of sRNAs are in fact remnants of PPR protein targets.
Chloroplast RNA metabolism is mediated by a multitude of nuclear encoded factors, many of which are highly specific for individual RNA processing events. In addition, a family of chloroplast ribonucleoproteins (cpRNPs) has been suspected to regulate larger sets of chloroplast transcripts. This together with their propensity for posttranslational modifications in response to external cues suggested a potential role of cpRNPs in the signal-dependent coregulation of chloroplast genes. We show here on a transcriptome-wide scale that the Arabidopsis thaliana cpRNPs CP31A and CP29A (for 31 kD and 29 kD chloroplast protein, respectively), associate with large, overlapping sets of chloroplast transcripts. We demonstrate that both proteins are essential for resistance of chloroplast development to cold stress. They are required to guarantee transcript stability of numerous mRNAs at low temperatures and under these conditions also support specific processing steps. Fine mapping of cpRNP-RNA interactions in vivo suggests multiple points of contact between these proteins and their RNA ligands. For CP31A, we demonstrate an essential function in stabilizing sense and antisense transcripts that span the border of the small single copy region and the inverted repeat of the chloroplast genome. CP31A associates with the common 39-terminus of these RNAs and protects them against 39-exonucleolytic activity.
Genes for pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are found in all eukaryotic genomes analyzed but are particularly abundant in land plants. The majority of analyzed PPR proteins play a role in the processing or translation of organellar RNAs. Few PPR proteins have been studied in detail, and the functional repertoire and mechanisms of action of proteins in the PPR family are poorly understood. Here we analyzed a maize ortholog of the embryo-essential Arabidopsis thaliana gene AtPPR5. A genome-wide analysis of chloroplast RNAs that coimmunoprecipitate with Zea mays PPR5 (ZmPPR5) demonstrated that ZmPPR5 is bound in vivo to the unspliced precursor of trnG-UCC. Null and hypomorphic Zmppr5 insertion mutants are embryo viable but are deficient for chloroplast ribosomes and die as seedlings. These mutants show a dramatic decrease in both spliced and unspliced trnG-UCC RNAs, while the transcription of trnG-UCC is unaffected. These results, together with biochemical data documenting the sequence-specific binding of recombinant PPR5 to the trnG-UCC group II intron, suggest that PPR5 stabilizes the trnG-UCC precursor by directly binding and protecting an endonuclease-sensitive site. These findings add to the evidence that chloroplast-localized PPR proteins that are embryo essential in Arabidopsis typically function in the biogenesis of the plastid translation machinery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.