The development of new clinically applicable methods for the delivery of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) is an area of intensive research. Cell-mediated gene therapy approaches are being explored as a potential delivery vehicle. Primary muscle-derived cells isolated from an adult mouse were transduced with an adenoviral-BMP-2 construct. These cells were injected into the triceps surae of severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice where they induced heterotopic bone formation. BMP-2 expression by these muscle-derived cell constructs was measured in vitro to estimate in vivo BMP-2 delivery. In vitro expression of BMP-2 by 3 x l0(5) muscle-derived cells was 87.89 ng/72 h. These results suggest that the efficiency of muscle cell-based gene delivery of BMP-2 exceeds the direct delivery of recombinant BMP-2 protein.
An increasing emphasis has been placed across health care on evidence-based medicine with higher level studies, such as randomized trials and prospective cohort studies. Historically, clinical research in orthopaedic surgery has been dominated by studies with low patient numbers from a limited number of surgeons. The purpose of this study was to test our hypothesis that orthopaedics has fewer multi-center collaborative studies as compared to other medical disciplines. We chose three leading journals from general medicine, a leading journal from the surgical subspecialties of obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmology and otolaryngology, and three leading journals from orthopaedic surgery based on highest impact factor. We compared the percentage of collaborative studies and the number of contributing institutions and authors in original research manuscripts published in 2009 between general medical, surgical subspecialty and orthopaedic surgery journals. A significantly higher percentage of manuscripts resulted from multicenter collaborative efforts in the general medical literature (p < 0.000001) and the other surgical subspecialty literature (p < 0.000001) compared to the orthopaedic surgery literature. Manuscripts published in the general medical journals came from more institutions (p < 0.0001) and had significantly more authors (p < 0.000001) than those published in the orthopaedic surgery journals. There is an opportunity to stimulate greater multicenter collaborative research, which correlates with increased patient numbers, a higher level of evidence and more generalizable findings, in the orthopaedic surgery community. These efforts can be supported through increased funding, surgeon participation, and appropriate expansion of authorship for multicenter studies in orthopaedic journals. ß
The effects of two oral contraceptive combinations, dienogest 2.0 mg plus ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg (Valette) and desogestrel 0.15 mg plus ethinyl estradiol 0.02 mg (Lovelle), on the human immune system were compared over one treatment cycle of 31 patients (n = 15 and n = 16, respectively). Lovelle but not Valette significantly increased the numbers of lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes. Valette decreased CD4 lymphocytes after 10 days' treatment; Lovelle had the opposite effect. Lovelle increased CD19 and CD23 after 21 days' treatment. Phagocytic activity was unaffected by either treatment. After 10 days' treatment, both contraceptives reduced serum IgA, IgG and IgM, which remained lowered at day 21 with Lovelle but returned to baseline with Valette. Secretory IgA was unaffected by either contraceptive. Neither treatment affected levels of interleukins, except for a significant difference between the treatment groups for interleukin-6 after 10 days' treatment that disappeared after 21 days' treatment. Levels of non-immunoglobulin serum components fluctuated; macroglobulin was increased with Valette. However, total protein and albumin levels were reduced more with Lovelle than with Valette. Complement factors also fluctuated. There was no evidence for any sustained immunosuppression with either Valette or Lovelle.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.