This article presents explicit ethnomethodological positions on the acceptability and/or desirability of using ethnographic data, variously conceived, with conversation analytic discourse data to carry out conversation analytic studies. Besides aiming to prompt thought about the different types of ethnographic data and their worth to certain social scientific objectives, this review also seeks to suggest why continuing ethnomethodological discussions regarding the use of ethnographic data might prove worthwhile to those trying to further their understanding of ethnomethodology.
One can categorize communibiological texts as interdisciplinary inspirational texts. However, one can classify these texts differently with equal plausibility by attending to aspects of the social psychology and economic conditions of current science that are rarely considered by most rhetoricians of science and attending to 2 significant rhetorical requirements of successful scientific texts-programmaticality and interestingness-that have gone unnoticed by rhetoricians of science to date. Given this equality of categorization plausibility, traditional genre theories are contradicted. More significantly, through the author's provision of a reflexive analysis, pragmatist genre theory is supported and extended. Thus, this article contributes to genre theory and the rhetoric of science.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.