ObjectiveTo analyze quality and frequency of OCTA artifacts and to evaluate their impact on the interpretability of OCTA images.Design75 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR), retinal artery occlusion (RAO), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), or neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and healthy controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional study in the outpatient department of a tertiary eye care center.MethodsAll participants underwent an OCTA examination (spectral domain OCT Cirrus 5000 equipped with the AngioPlex module). OCTA scans were analyzed independently by two experienced ophthalmologists. Frequency of various artifacts for the entire OCTA scan and for different segmentation layers and the grading of OCTA interpretability were investigated.ResultsThe analysis of 75 eyes of 38 women and 37 men between 24 and 94 years were included. Six eyes had no retinal disease, 19 eyes had nAMD, 16 had DR, 19 eyes had RVO, and 15 eyes showed RAO. A macular edema (ME) was present in 40 of the diseased eyes. Projection artifacts occurred in all eyes in any structure below the superficial retinal vessel layer, segmentation and motion artifacts were found in 55% (41/75) and 49% (37/75) of eyes, respectively. Other artifacts occurred less frequently. Segmentation artifacts were significantly more frequent in diseased than in healthy eyes (p<0.01). Qualitative assessment of OCTA images was graded as excellent in 65% and sufficient in 25% of cases, adding up to 91% images deemed acceptable for examination. Presence of ME was associated with a significantly poorer interpretability (p<0.01).Conclusion and RelevanceVarious artifacts appear at different frequencies in OCTA images. Nevertheless, a qualitative assessment of the OCTA images is almost always possible. Good knowledge of possible artifacts and critical analysis of the complete OCTA dataset are essential for correct clinical interpretation and determining a precise clinical diagnosis.

Quality management improves the structures, processes and results of organizations of all kinds. Many practices and clinics have their existing quality management system certified according to ISO 9001, (e.g., to check their own quality management system or to obtain a testimonial against third parties). The latest version ISO 9001:2015 contains some changes, both structurally and in terms of content. These changes can be met with reasonable efforts. An ISO 9001:2015 certification represents a value for your organization, but these advantages are often not directly measurable.

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To compare typical findings of diabetic retinopathy in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA). <b><i>Subjects/Methods:</i></b> 42 patients were enrolled in this study. We performed FA and obtained en face 3 × 3 mm OCTA images of the macular region. The count of microaneurysms (MAs) and the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were compared. The assessability of the imaging modalities was graded in each eye. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 53 eyes of 42 patients with a mean age of 61 years were included. 36/53 eyes revealed nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, 17/53 eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The mean size of the FAZ was 0.39 mm² in FA and 0.42 mm² in OCTA. The mean MA count was 14 in FA and 13 in OCTA. The assessability was favorable to OCTA in 38–41/53 eyes regarding the FAZ and favorable to FA in 45–49/53 eyes regarding MAs. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We found a good agreement for the size of the FAZ and a weak agreement regarding the count of MAs in both imaging modalities. The readers favored OCTA for the assessment of the FAZ and FA for the assessment of MAs. Complementary use of FA and OCTA ensures the best diagnostic approach in patients with diabetic retinopathy.