By applying a standardized and diligently monitored thrombolysis protocol, carried out by a specialized stroke team within a neurological emergency room, in-hospital delays can be minimized. This allows improvement of door-to-needle times irrespective of the time to arrival and treatment during off-hours.

Background: Several contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis are not based on controlled trials. Specialized stroke centers often apply less restrictive criteria. The aim of our study was to analyze how many patients at our institution receive off-label thrombolysis. In addition, clinical outcome and safety data were compared to those from patients treated on-label, and the influence of different definitions of ‘minor stroke’ were examined. Methods: Consecutive thrombolysis patients treated between January 2006 and January 2010 were included. Patients treated off-label were compared to patients given on-label therapy according to the European license. Since no specified definition for ‘minor neurological deficit’ exists in the license, two distinct definitions were considered off-label, i.e. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSSS) <1 (definition 1) and NIHSSS ≤4 (definition 2). Results: Of a total of 422 patients, 232 (55%) were treated off-label. The most prevalent off-label criteria (OLCs) were the following: age >80 years (n = 113), minor stroke (definition 1, n = 3; definition 2, n = 84), elevated blood pressure necessitating aggressive treatment (n = 75), time window >3 h (n = 71) and major surgery or trauma within the preceding 3 months (n = 20). In group comparisons, off-label patients had an overall worse outcome using definition 1 for minor stroke, while there was no difference when definition 2 was applied. In multivariate analysis, off-label therapy (definition 1) in general and age >80 years were independent predictors of poor outcome. None of the contraindications were associated with an increased bleeding risk. Conclusions: Off-label therapy is frequently applied at our center and is not associated with higher complication rates. Overall outcome of off-label treatment largely depends on the definition used for minor stroke. Besides age >80 years, a known poor prognostic factor, no other specific OLC was associated with poor outcome. Our data suggest that the criteria in the European license may be too restrictive.

Background: Approximately 5–10% of all acute ischemic strokes (AIS) occur in the territory of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Little is known about intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in this infarct subgroup in terms of outcome and intracerebral hemorrhage rates. The aim of our study was to evaluate differences between supratentorial PCA infarcts and anterior circulation infarcts regarding baseline characteristics, stroke severity, outcome, safety and clinical findings, which would implicate a change in the existing thrombolysis practice in patients with PCA stroke. Methods: All patients with AIS in the supratentorial PCA territory receiving IVT between 01/2006 and 01/2010 were selected from the Erlangen Thrombolysis Database (group 1, n = 21). They were compared to all IVT patients with strokes in other supratentorial vascular territories over the same period of time (group 2, n = 398). Baseline demographic data, as well as clinical and laboratory findings were analyzed. The outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. Results: Only serum glucose levels at baseline (110.5 ± 36.1 vs. 127.2 ± 48.2 mg/dl; p = 0.036) and the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (median 6.5 vs. 9; p = 0.016) were significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2. Favorable clinical outcome (57.1 vs. 48.6%; p = 0.445) and intracerebral hemorrhage rates (4.8 vs. 4%; p = 1.000) were comparable in both groups. Conclusions: No substantial differences were found between supratentorial PCA and anterior circulation infarcts. Our data on safety and efficacy support the present common thrombolysis practice in supratentorial PCA infarct patients, though an indication for IVT should rather be based on the existence of functionally disabling deficit than merely on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Background and Purpose-Because of the narrow therapeutic range for thrombolysis in stroke, accurate weight-based dosing is essential for efficacy and safety. Stroke patients are frequently incapable to communicate their correct body weight (BW). Thus, dosing is often based on BW estimation, which may lead to dosing errors. The aim of our study was to evaluate availability of BW information, accuracy of estimations, and final dosing of Alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]) in a routine clinical setting. Methods-A total of 109 consecutive intravenous thrombolysis patients were prospectively included in the study.Recruitment concluded with 100 complete data sets. Before therapy, BW was estimated independently by 2 physicians, 2 emergency nurses, and a neuroradiological technical assistant. Patients were weighed, and anthropometric measurements for BW approximation were taken. Dosing errors were assessed. Clinical outcome was evaluated at 90 days. Results-Of 109 patients, 55 (50.5%) were unable to provide information on their BW. Of those, 11 (20%) were accompanied by relatives able to give BW information. For all patients, estimation errors rates ranged from 20.8% (patient's own estimation) up to 38.2% (treating physician) and 42.2% (emergency nurse). Finally, 29 patients received an Alteplase dosage diverging Ͼ10% from the optimal dose. Twelve were under-and 17 overdosed. Underdosage was an independent predictor for worse outcome in multivariate analysis. Conclusions-Our study shows that reliable BW data are missing for a majority of intravenous thrombolysis patients.Measuring BW before administering Alteplase remains challenging. Given dosing errors in one-third of patients and the observed impact on outcome, standardized weighing before thrombolysis should be considered. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01006434.

Background: Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the only approved specific therapy for acute ischemic stroke. This study analyzes demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with early complete neurological recovery after thrombolysis. Methods: Data of 320 consecutive patients treated with rt-PA within 3 h of stroke onset at our facility between April 2006 and March 2009 were extracted from our prospective institutional stroke and thrombolysis database. Baseline demographic parameters, risk factors, clinical characteristics as well as neuroradiologic findings of patients with complete recovery 24 h after treatment and at hospital discharge were analyzed. Outcome was evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Results: Thirty patients (9.4%) were asymptomatic 24 h after thrombolysis and 70 (22%) at hospital discharge. Patients with complete recovery were younger, more often male, had milder stroke symptoms, less often cardioembolic strokes, fewer bleeding complications and more often normal follow-up imaging. In addition, in-hospital time was shorter and these patients retained a better functional outcome at 90 days. Only 1 patient who had completely recovered at hospital discharge died during the follow-up time. In multivariate regression analysis, only the National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) on admission was predictive for complete recovery at both examined time points. Conclusion: Rapid complete recovery can be achieved in up to a fifth of acute stroke patients treated with thrombolysis. These patients are younger and have milder strokes, less often with cardioembolic origin. Better outcome and lower mortality are sustained at 3 months.