Background and Purpose-Strokes have especially devastating implications if they occur early in life; however, only limited information exists on the characteristics of acute cerebrovascular disease in young adults. Although risk factors and manifestation of atherosclerosis are commonly associated with stroke in the elderly, recent data suggests different causes for stroke in the young. We initiated the prospective, multinational European study Stroke in Young Fabry Patients (sifap) to characterize a cohort of young stroke patients. Methods-Overall, 5023 patients aged 18 to 55 years with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke (3396) *Drs Rolfs, Fazekas and Grittner contributed equally to this work. Authors contributions: Dr Rolfs has conceptualized, initiated, and designed and organized the study, has been involved in the recruitment of the patients, and wrote significant parts of the manuscript. Dr Fazekas was involved in the study planning and has done together with Drs Enzinger and Schmidt the analysis of all MRI scans; this group was mainly involved in the statistical analysis of the MRI data. Drs Martus, Grittner, Holzhausen have taken responsibility for all statistical analysis and for the data structure of the total data bank. Drs Dichgans, Böttcher, Tatlisumak, Tanislav, Jungehulsing, Putaala, Huber, Bodechtel, Lichy, Hennerici, Kaps, Meyer, Kessler have been most active in the recruitment of the patients, drafting the manuscript and significantly influencing the scientific discussion. Dr Heuschmann was involved in drafting the manuscript and influencing the scientific discussion. Dr Norrving chaired the steering and publication committees of sifap, has written parts of the manuscript, and has significantly influenced the scientific discussions. Drs Lackner and Paschke, H. Mascher, Dr Riess have been involved in the laboratory analyses. Dr Kolodny has mostly contributed to the discussion of the Fabry cases. Dr Giese assisted in writing and editing the manuscript. All authors have reviewed, critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.The sponsors of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The academic authors had unrestricted access to the derived dataset, and assume full responsibility for the completeness, integrity, and interpretation of the data, as well as writing the study report and the decision to submit for publication.†Listed in Appendix I in the online-only Data Supplement. Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, was guest editor for this article.

The EUROASPIRE III stroke-specific module shows that secondary prevention and risk factor control in patients after ischaemic stroke need to be improved in four European centres at the time of the study since about half of patients are not achieving risk factor targets defined in European guidelines.

Background: Thrombolytic therapy is frequently withheld in patients with minor stroke symptoms. However, recent studies demonstrate that a substantial proportion of these patients dies or remains permanently disabled because of underestimation of symptom severity at baseline or secondary deterioration. We aimed to assess the safety and outcome of thrombolysis therapy in patients with minor but disabling stroke symptoms. Methods: 32 patients presenting with mild symptoms were treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator between April 2006 and April 2008. Data were extracted from a prospectively collected database. Baseline demographic data, and clinical, laboratory and imaging findings were analyzed. Outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months and was dichotomized into favorable (mRS 0–1) versus unfavorable (mRS 2–6). Results: In the majority of patients, the left hemisphere was affected, with aphasia representing the most common symptom leading to treatment decision. The frequency of perfusion lesion (46%) and vessel occlusion (35%) at baseline was high but had no effect on the outcome at 3 months in our series of treated patients. Outcome was favorable in 94% of patients, and 47% recovered without any persisting symptom. Only one asymptomatic and no symptomatic hemorrhage was observed. Conclusion: Our data support current guidelines and international licenses which give no lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) limit for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Considering the accumulating evidence that the natural course in patients with mild symptoms is not as favorable as often assumed and taking the low risk of bleeding in those patients into account, patients with mild but disabling symptoms should be treated with IVT regardless of their baseline NIHSS score.

No abstract

Background and Purpose-Quality indicators serve as standards of care by which performance of individual hospitals is measured. Although several audits for monitoring quality of stroke care have been established in Europe, there is currently no consensus on quality indicators for acute stroke care or for methodology for collecting information on these measures. Methods-An up-to-date inventory on European stroke audits in place in 2006 was performed in the course of a project funded by the European Union (European Implementation Score Collaboration [EIS]). Two regional (Flanders, Belgium; Catalonia, Spain) and 4 national (Germany, Scotland, Sweden, England/Wales/Northern Ireland) stroke audits took part. Between November 2009 and July 2010, 2 standardized surveys and a series of interviews were performed to determine characteristics, methods, and content of these quality initiatives. For quality purposes, all summarized information was validated by representatives of the respective audits. Results-Overall, 123 quality indicators (91 process, 24 outcome, and 8 structural indicators) were identified.Anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and brain imaging were the only quality indicators used in all, whereas another 13 indicators were used in at least 2 of the quality initiatives. Substantial variations were found across the audits in terms of the development process of quality indicators, inclusion criteria, participation, population coverage, data documentation, follow-ups, benchmarking, and feedback of results to participants. Conclusions-There is a huge variety in measuring performance of acute stroke care in Europe, hampering valid comparisons of acute stroke care.