The report by Hyppönen and Power in this issue of the Journal (1) highlights a frustrating and regrettable situation for nutrition researchers. In the early 1970s, the same serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations reported by Hyppönen and Power were thought to be indicative of "healthy" white adults in the United Kingdom (2). However, during those early years after the discovery of 25(OH)D, the adequacy of its serum concentration was based simply on whether the concentration was enough to prevent osteomalacia or rickets. Three decades later, we know that 25(OH)D concentrations relate to many other aspects of health, including fracture risk, bone density, colon cancer, and even tooth attachment (3); we also know that much higher concentrations of 25(OH)D are needed to prevent adverse outcomes. Indeed, in the 1958 British birth cohort, lower 25(OH)D is associated with a higher percentage of hemoglobin A 1C (a measure of long-term glucose concentration), which further emphasizes the need to maintain optimal 25(OH)D concentrations (4).Randomized trials using the currently recommended intakes of 400 IU vitamin D/d have shown no appreciable reduction in fracture risk (3). In contrast, trials using 700 -800 IU vitamin D/d found less fracture incidence, with and without supplemental calcium (3). The reduction in fracture incidence occurs when mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations exceed 72 nmol/L, and this change may result from both improved bone health and reduction in falls due to greater muscle strength (3). Although it is not yet proven through clinical trials, higher intakes may also reduce the incidence of colon and other cancers, and these relations indicate that the desirable 25(OH)D concentration is ͧ75 nmol/L (3). One recent report associates greater 25(OH)D concentrations with lower risk of nursing home admission; the most desirable category of concentration starts at 75 nmol/L (5).Human diets do not provide sufficient vitamin D; if they did, the abovementioned associations between health and serum 25(OH)D concentrations would not be so routinely observed. The vitamin D provided by foods and supplements is overwhelmed by the effect of skin exposure to ultraviolet B light. Geography, season, skin color, and sun-related behavior are the main predictors of vitamin D nutritional status (6 -10). Correction of low 25(OH)D concentrations can happen only if some or all of the following are implemented: the encouragement of safe, moderate exposure of skin to ultraviolet light; appropriate increases in food fortification with vitamin D; and the provision of higher doses of vitamin D in supplements for adults.Evaluation of most relations of health and disease that involve vitamin D leads to the conclusion that a desirable 25(OH)D concentration is ͧ75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL) (3-5). If a concentration of 75 nmol/L is the goal to be achieved by consumption of vitamin D, then why is it so rare for members of the population to accomplish this? One reason is that almost every time the public media report that vitamin D nutri...

Increasing calcium intake by consuming cheese appears to be more beneficial for cortical bone mass accrual than the consumption of tablets containing a similar amount of calcium. Diverse patterns of growth velocity may mask the efficacy of supplementation in a short-term trial of children transiting through puberty.

Fortification of foods is a feasible way of preventing low vitamin D status. Bread could be a suitable vehicle for fortification because it is a common part of diets worldwide. The bioavailability of cholecalciferol from bread is not known. We studied cholecalciferol stability, the concentration of the added cholecalciferol, the dispersion of cholecalciferol in bread, and the bioavailability of cholecalciferol from fortified bread. Three batches of fortified low-fiber wheat and high-fiber rye breads were baked; from each batch, 3 samples of dough and bread were analyzed for their cholecalciferol content. In a single-blind bioavailability study, 41 healthy women, 25-45 y old, with mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration 29 nmol/L (range 12-45 nmol/L), were randomly assigned to 4 study groups. Each group consumed fortified wheat bread, fortified rye bread, regular wheat bread (control), or regular wheat bread and a cholecalciferol supplement (vitamin D control) daily for 3 wk. The daily dose of vitamin D was 10 mug in all groups except the control group. The vitamin dispersed evenly in the breads and was stable. Both fortified breads increased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration as effectively as the cholecalciferol supplement. Supplementation or fortification did not affect serum intact parathyroid hormone concentration or urinary calcium excretion. In conclusion, fortified bread is a safe and feasible way to improve vitamin D nutrition.

No abstract