No abstract

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) is vulnerable to interference from many sources. If the baseline aPTT is prolonged, as occurs with lupus inhibitors, alternative methods are required to monitor DTI levels. We compared the plasma diluted thrombin time (1:4 dilution of patient plasma with normal plasma) and the aPTT in patient samples spiked with argatroban, bivalirudin, or lepirudin at three concentration levels. Each drug was spiked into five samples with lupus inhibitors, five samples with deficient vitamin K-dependent factors, three samples with elevated D-dimers, and eight samples with normal baseline aPTT values. The aPTT overestimated the spiked DTI concentration in all samples with lupus inhibitors, low levels of vitamin K-dependent factors, and elevated D-dimers. In samples with normal baseline aPTTs, the aPTT failed to correctly estimate the spiked drug concentration in four of 24 samples spiked with argatroban, seven of 24 spiked with lepirudin, and three of 24 spiked with bivalirudin. The plasma diluted thrombin time was not affected by lupus inhibitors, low vitamin K-dependent factor levels or elevated D-dimer levels and correctly estimated the spiked drug level in 63 of 63 samples spiked with argatroban, 63 of 63 samples spiked with bivalirudin, and 62 of 63 samples spiked with lepirudin. In conclusion, the plasma diluted thrombin time appears to be a viable alternative to the aPTT for monitoring DTI levels, especially in patients with lupus inhibitors or low levels of vitamin K-dependent factors.

New anticoagulants, like the orally available direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) dabigatran etexilate, have recently been introduced into the market for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. While dabigatran has been approved for use without the need for routine therapeutic monitoring, there are clinical scenarios in which monitoring can help guide clinical management. We report herein the application of a recently described plasma-diluted thrombin time (DTI assay) used to monitor intravenous DTI as a useful and easily implemented method to monitor oral DTIs.

Limiting EHPs to bleeding patients and modifications to the process and assays used for hemostasis testing lead to TATs of less than 20 minutes for critical testing in the clinical laboratory.

We compared 1-stage clot-based, chromogenic, and immunoassay methods for measuring factor VIII in plasma with a focus on the measurement of elevated levels of factor VIII. The chromogenic assay showed the best interassay imprecision for factor VIII levels near 150 IU/dL. The best correlation was between the 1-stage clot-based and chromogenic factor VIII assays (r2 = 0.934), and the lowest correlation was between the 1-stage clot-based and antigenic factor VIII assays (r2 = 0.821). The presence of heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, lepirudin, or lupus inhibitors in the sample resulted in major interference in the 1-stage clot-based assay but not the chromogenic or antigenic factor VIII assays. Overall, the chromogenic factor VIII activity assay was the optimal method, showing good precision, the best overall correlation with other assays, and no interference from heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, lepirudin, or lupus inhibitors.

We compared plasma with whole blood (WB) international normalized ratio (INR) and fibrinogen using the same instrument and reagents. WBINRs were 50% higher than plasma INRs. After increasing the WB sample volume 40% and adjusting the International Sensitivity Index, WBINRs were similar to plasma INRs [adjusted WBINR = 0.99(plasma INR) - 0.02; r(2) = 0.98; n = 155], but the average difference in WB vs plasma INR was 4-fold higher than duplicate plasma INRs. Variation in hematocrit was a major determinant of the accuracy of the WBINR, with increased error at high INRs. The WB fibrinogen assay was highly dependent on the sample hematocrit (r(2) = 0.83), even after the sample volume was adjusted. Accurate WB fibrinogen measurements required a mathematical hematocrit correction. We conclude that WBINR and fibrinogen assays can be performed on point-of-care or automated analyzers, but sample volume must be adjusted to account for hematocrit. Accuracy is limited by variations in hematocrit with worsening accuracy for samples with high INRs or low fibrinogen levels.

We compared 2 commercial plasma procoagulant phospholipid activity (PPA) assays, chromogenic, using bound annexin V to capture phosphatidylserine-containing microparticles, and clot-based. In both, anionic phospholipids accelerated activation of prothrombin by factor Xa. PPA levels were lower in the chromogenic vs the clot-based assay, with poor correlation between methods: normal samples, mean ± SD, 27 ± 17 vs 590 ± 414 nmol/L (n = 24; r(2) = 0.29) and patient samples, mean ± SD, 45 ± 44 vs 401 ± 330 nmol/L (n = 51; r(2) = 0.26). Recovery of phosphatidylserine added to normal, heparinized, and warfarin plasma samples averaged 109% ± 39% using the chromogenic assay but was higher and more varied (mean ± SD, 176% ± 59%) in the clot-based assay. Lupus anticoagulants caused low recovery in both assays. Removal of microparticles by 0.22-μm filtration reduced PPA by 91% in the clot-based and 65% in the chromogenic assay. The clot-based assay showed higher correlation (r(2) = 0.82 vs 0.23) with flow cytometric platelet microparticle counts. The 2 assays measure different aspects of PPA in plasma, with the chromogenic assay primarily measuring smaller microparticles.

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines require special processing of whole blood specimens with hematocrits greater than 55% due to the possibility of spurious prolongation of routine coagulation studies (PT, aPTT). As samples with hematocrits above 60% are rare at our institution, our study seeks to determine the effect of relative citrate excess on routine coagulation studies in samples with hematocrits of 60% to determine whether special processing is necessary. A calculated volume of 3.2% citrate was added to 1 mL aliquots of 40 whole blood samples in citrated tubes from adult patients to simulate a hematocrit of 60%. A dilutional control was created by adding an equivalent volume of saline to a separate 1 mL aliquot. Routine coagulation studies (PT, aPTT) were run on both samples on the STA Compact Analyzer in accordance with manufacturer instructions. While a paired Student's t-test demonstrated a clinically significant change in both PT and aPTT with the addition of citrate (p = 0.0002 for PT and p = 0.0234 for aPTT), clinical management would not have been altered by any observed change. More interestingly, we observed a shortening of 27/40 PTs and 23/40 aPTTs rather than the expected prolongation. Based on our data, no adjustment of citrate volume appears to be necessary in samples with hematocrits less than or equal to 60%.